From: "Zach O'Keefe" <zokeefe@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@microsoft.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm/thp: fix "mm: thp: kill __transhuge_page_enabled()"
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 06:22:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAa6QmTqk5bBMOMiuWP-92NcYN2XckXHpHLa8WJPysC2g8Mtxw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231006105012.61a12beefaa0f9a5adc8299f@linux-foundation.org>
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 10:50 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 13:01:10 -0700 "Zach O'Keefe" <zokeefe@google.com> wrote:
>
> > The 6.0 commits:
> >
> > commit 9fec51689ff6 ("mm: thp: kill transparent_hugepage_active()")
> > commit 7da4e2cb8b1f ("mm: thp: kill __transhuge_page_enabled()")
> >
> > merged "can we have THPs in this VMA?" logic that was previously done
> > separately by fault-path, khugepaged, and smaps "THPeligible" checks.
> >
> > During the process, the semantics of the fault path check changed in two
> > ways:
> >
> > 1) A VM_NO_KHUGEPAGED check was introduced (also added to smaps path).
> > 2) We no longer checked if non-anonymous memory had a vm_ops->huge_fault
> > handler that could satisfy the fault. Previously, this check had been
> > done in create_huge_pud() and create_huge_pmd() routines, but after
> > the changes, we never reach those routines.
> >
> > During the review of the above commits, it was determined that in-tree
> > users weren't affected by the change; most notably, since the only relevant
> > user (in terms of THP) of VM_MIXEDMAP or ->huge_fault is DAX, which is
> > explicitly approved early in approval logic. However, this was a bad
> > assumption to make as it assumes the only reason to support ->huge_fault
> > was for DAX (which is not true in general).
> >
> > Remove the VM_NO_KHUGEPAGED check when not in collapse path and give
> > any ->huge_fault handler a chance to handle the fault. Note that we
> > don't validate the file mode or mapping alignment, which is consistent
> > with the behavior before the aforementioned commits.
>
> It's unclear what are the userspace visible impacts of this change.
> Which makes it hard for others to determine whether -stable kernels
> should be patched.
IMO, I don't think this change is suitable for -stable; the only users
that would have been affected are those that maintain out-of-tree
drivers / code that hooked into ->huge_fault() or used VM_MIXEDMAP +
THP. No users of the in-tree kernel would have been affected. It's
still a good "fix" to make going forward (and certainly happy to be
able to help Saurabh out).
+ greg k-h for vis / to confirm.
> > Fixes: 7da4e2cb8b1f ("mm: thp: kill __transhuge_page_enabled()")
> > Reported-by: Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@microsoft.com>
>
> It's nice to include a Closes: link after a Reported-by:. Then readers
> are better able to answer the above question.
Ah, apologies, Andrew; I didn't know such a tag existed -- I'll be
sure to include it in the future.
> > Signed-off-by: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
> > Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> > Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-09 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-25 20:01 Zach O'Keefe
2023-09-26 21:39 ` Yang Shi
2023-10-06 17:50 ` Andrew Morton
2023-10-09 13:22 ` Zach O'Keefe [this message]
2023-10-06 17:58 ` Andrew Morton
2023-10-06 18:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-10-06 19:11 ` Andrew Morton
2023-10-06 21:28 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-10-09 13:23 ` Zach O'Keefe
2023-10-06 18:53 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAa6QmTqk5bBMOMiuWP-92NcYN2XckXHpHLa8WJPysC2g8Mtxw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=zokeefe@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=ssengar@microsoft.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox