From: Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: could you clarify mm/mempolicy: fix !vma in new_vma_page()
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 21:10:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA_GA1dh3TtzGnK0HgAb_Sy6ww5JBaFqmf_YViPKpMCEpzFh4w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140108124240.GH27937@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Wed 08-01-14 20:09:30, Bob Liu wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > If I was debugging this I would simply add printk into page_address_in_vma
>> > error paths.
>> >
>> > Anyway, I think that at least hugetlbfs part should be reverted because
>> > it might paper over real bugs. Although the migration would fail for
>> > such hugetlb page we should catch that a weird page was tried to be
>> > migrated. What about the patch below?
>>
>> Looks good to me. But we need to confirm whether our assumption is right.
>
> Which assumption you have in mind? non-linear mapping or failing on
> anon_vma or f_mapping checks?
>
The assumption that the original BUG_ON(!vma) was triggered by
non-linear mapping.
>> Sasha, could you please have a test with Michal's patch?
>
> I obviously doesn't have anything against testing but we should really
> focus on the original issue. This patch simply restores hugetlb code
Oh, I see your point.
Yes, I agree that your patch should be merged and if the BUG_ON() is
triggered(which is unlikely) again.
We can open another thread and analysis the root cause.
>> > ---
>> > From 2d61421f26a3b63b4670d71b7adc67e2191b6157 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
>> > Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 10:57:41 +0100
>> > Subject: [PATCH] mm: new_vma_page cannot see NULL vma for hugetlb pages
>> >
>> > 11c731e81bb0 (mm/mempolicy: fix !vma in new_vma_page()) has removed
>> > BUG_ON(!vma) from new_vma_page which is partially correct because
>> > page_address_in_vma will return EFAULT for non-linear mappings and at
>> > least shared shmem might be mapped this way.
>> >
>> > The patch also tried to prevent NULL ptr for hugetlb pages which is not
>> > correct AFAICS because hugetlb pages cannot be mapped as VM_NONLINEAR
>> > and other conditions in page_address_in_vma seem to be legit and catch
>> > real bugs.
>> >
>> > This patch restores BUG_ON for PageHuge to catch potential issues when
>> > the to-be-migrated page is not setup properly.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
>> > ---
>> > mm/mempolicy.c | 6 ++----
>> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
>> > index 9e8d2d86978a..f3f51464a23b 100644
>> > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
>> > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
>> > @@ -1199,10 +1199,8 @@ static struct page *new_vma_page(struct page *page, unsigned long private, int *
>> > }
>> >
>> > if (PageHuge(page)) {
>> > - if (vma)
>> > - return alloc_huge_page_noerr(vma, address, 1);
>> > - else
>> > - return NULL;
>> > + BUG_ON(vma)
>> > + return alloc_huge_page_noerr(vma, address, 1);
>> > }
>> > /*
>> > * if !vma, alloc_page_vma() will use task or system default policy
>> > --
>> > 1.8.5.2
>> >
--
Regards,
--Bob
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-08 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-06 11:24 Michal Hocko
2014-01-06 12:45 ` Bob Liu
2014-01-06 14:18 ` Michal Hocko
2014-01-07 4:26 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-07 4:34 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-01-07 8:34 ` Michal Hocko
2014-01-07 5:29 ` Bob Liu
2014-01-07 10:22 ` Michal Hocko
2014-01-07 17:30 ` Michal Hocko
2014-01-08 0:56 ` Bob Liu
2014-01-08 10:08 ` Michal Hocko
2014-01-08 12:09 ` Bob Liu
2014-01-08 12:42 ` Michal Hocko
2014-01-08 13:10 ` Bob Liu [this message]
2014-01-08 13:49 ` Michal Hocko
2014-01-08 13:54 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA_GA1dh3TtzGnK0HgAb_Sy6ww5JBaFqmf_YViPKpMCEpzFh4w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lliubbo@gmail.com \
--cc=bob.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox