> On Jan 26, 2023, at 8:58 AM, Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:30:34AM -0800, Viacheslav A.Dubeyko wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 23, 2023, at 9:46 AM, Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@samsung.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 09:51:19PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023, Viacheslav A.Dubeyko wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> CC: LSF/MM/BPF mailing list. Sorry, missed the list.
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jan 6, 2023, at 11:51 AM, Viacheslav A.Dubeyko <viacheslav.dubeyko@bytedance.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe CXL memory is hot topic now. I believe we have multiple topics
>>>>>> for discussion. I personally would like to discuss CXL Fabric Manager
>>>>>> and vision of FM architecture implementation. I am going to share the topic
>>>>>> in separate email. I would like to suggest a special session for CXL memory
>>>>>> related topics.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How everybody feels about it?
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think this makes a lot of sense, thanks for suggesting it.
>>>>
>>>> Should this be a BoF or just a normal topic proposal?  I assume that there
>>>> could be several different topics of interest all related to CXL.mem.
>>>>
>>>
>>> +1 for a normal topic proposal.
>>
>> By the way, Samsung SMDK (memory development kit) suggested memory model
>> in user-space and kernel memory subsystem modification. I assume that we need
>> to discuss the memory model and kernel-space modification. So, it could be one of
>> the CXL related topic. Could we expect that Samsung guys deliver a talk?
>
> +Kyungsan Kim
>
> It is my understanding that Kyungsan, who is the lead for the SMDK project is
> interested in sharing with the community some lessons learned from working with
> CXL attached memory and a CFP is planned.
>

Sounds pretty great for me. :)

Thanks,
Slava.