From: Suresh Chandrappa <suresh.k.chandrappa@gmail.com>
To: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, shuah@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests: cachestat: Refactor test to remove duplication
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 23:17:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAMO5pjerVWvCQMF7huENatrwvoU+W0mvtbuR5Vzx+ninU59pw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAMO5piWOCpRKAbC7KfXAgFm0F2_ga4qr4n3vQ+v5rezuHktnQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9045 bytes --]
Hi Nhat,
>> -bool test_cachestat_shmem(void)
>> +bool run_cachestat_test(enum file_type type)
Can you just call this function test_cachestat(enum file_type type) ?
We already have a function named *test_cachestat* that was introduced
earlier in the codebase, so to avoid confusion or naming conflicts, I’ve
named this one run_cachestat_test
On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 11:07 PM Suresh Chandrappa <
suresh.k.chandrappa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Nhat,
> Sure i will squash them to a single patch and will share it.
>
> Thanks
> Suresh K C
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 10:11 PM Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 9:58 PM Suresh Chandrappa
>> <suresh.k.chandrappa@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi @nphamcs
>> > Can you please check the modified change
>>
>> Is this supposed to be on top of the earlier patch you sent out? In
>> that case, you should send both together as a patch series.
>>
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Suresh K C
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, 11 Jun 2025, 23:39 Suresh K C, <suresh.k.chandrappa@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> From: Suresh K C <suresh.k.chandrappa@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >> Refactored the mmap and shmem test logic into a common function
>> >> to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability
>> >>
>> >> Changes in v2:
>> >> Refactored mmap and shmem tests into a common function
>> >> Renamed test function to run_cachestat_test()
>> >> Removed test for /proc/cpuinfo as a general /proc test case
>> already exists
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Suresh K C <suresh.k.chandrappa@gmail.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> .../selftests/cachestat/test_cachestat.c | 97 ++++++-------------
>> >> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cachestat/test_cachestat.c
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/cachestat/test_cachestat.c
>> >> index 81e7f6dd2279..7c2f64175943 100644
>> >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cachestat/test_cachestat.c
>> >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cachestat/test_cachestat.c
>> >> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
>> >>
>> >> static const char * const dev_files[] = {
>> >> "/dev/zero", "/dev/null", "/dev/urandom",
>> >> - "/proc/version","/proc/cpuinfo","/proc"
>> >> + "/proc/version","/proc"
>>
>> So you removed one file that you added in an earlier patch, right?
>> Then why bother adding it in the first place...?
>>
>> Can you either:
>>
>> 1. Send the two patch together as a series. In the first patch, do not
>> add /proc/cpuinfo.
>>
>> or
>>
>> 2. Squash them into a single patch. I'll let you decide if this is worth
>> it.
>>
>>
>> >> };
>> >>
>> >> void print_cachestat(struct cachestat *cs)
>> >> @@ -33,6 +33,11 @@ void print_cachestat(struct cachestat *cs)
>> >> cs->nr_evicted, cs->nr_recently_evicted);
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> +enum file_type {
>> >> + FILE_MMAP,
>> >> + FILE_SHMEM
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> bool write_exactly(int fd, size_t filesize)
>> >> {
>> >> int random_fd = open("/dev/urandom", O_RDONLY);
>> >> @@ -202,66 +207,8 @@ static int test_cachestat(const char *filename,
>> bool write_random, bool create,
>> >> return ret;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> -bool test_cachestat_mmap(void){
>> >> -
>> >> - size_t PS = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
>> >> - size_t filesize = PS * 512 * 2;;
>> >> - int syscall_ret;
>> >> - size_t compute_len = PS * 512;
>> >> - struct cachestat_range cs_range = { PS, compute_len };
>> >> - char *filename = "tmpshmcstat";
>> >> - unsigned long num_pages = compute_len / PS;
>> >> - struct cachestat cs;
>> >> - bool ret = true;
>> >> - int fd = open(filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC, 0666);
>> >> - if (fd < 0) {
>> >> - ksft_print_msg("Unable to create mmap file.\n");
>> >> - ret = false;
>> >> - goto out;
>> >> - }
>> >> - if (ftruncate(fd, filesize)) {
>> >> - ksft_print_msg("Unable to truncate mmap file.\n");
>> >> - ret = false;
>> >> - goto close_fd;
>> >> - }
>> >> - if (!write_exactly(fd, filesize)) {
>> >> - ksft_print_msg("Unable to write to mmap file.\n");
>> >> - ret = false;
>> >> - goto close_fd;
>> >> - }
>> >> - char *map = mmap(NULL, filesize, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
>> MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
>> >> - if (map == MAP_FAILED) {
>> >> - ksft_print_msg("mmap failed.\n");
>> >> - ret = false;
>> >> - goto close_fd;
>> >> - }
>> >> -
>> >> - for (int i = 0; i < filesize; i++) {
>> >> - map[i] = 'A';
>> >> - }
>> >> - map[filesize - 1] = 'X';
>> >> -
>> >> - syscall_ret = syscall(__NR_cachestat, fd, &cs_range, &cs, 0);
>> >> -
>> >> - if (syscall_ret) {
>> >> - ksft_print_msg("Cachestat returned non-zero.\n");
>> >> - ret = false;
>> >> - } else {
>> >> - print_cachestat(&cs);
>> >> - if (cs.nr_cache + cs.nr_evicted != num_pages) {
>> >> - ksft_print_msg("Total number of cached and
>> evicted pages is off.\n");
>> >> - ret = false;
>> >> - }
>> >> - }
>> >> -
>> >> -close_fd:
>> >> - close(fd);
>> >> - unlink(filename);
>> >> -out:
>> >> - return ret;
>> >> -}
>> >>
>> >> -bool test_cachestat_shmem(void)
>> >> +bool run_cachestat_test(enum file_type type)
>>
>> Can you just call this function test_cachestat(enum file_type type) ?
>>
>> >> {
>> >> size_t PS = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
>> >> size_t filesize = PS * 512 * 2; /* 2 2MB huge pages */
>> >> @@ -271,27 +218,43 @@ bool test_cachestat_shmem(void)
>> >> char *filename = "tmpshmcstat";
>> >> struct cachestat cs;
>> >> bool ret = true;
>> >> + int fd;
>> >> unsigned long num_pages = compute_len / PS;
>> >> - int fd = shm_open(filename, O_CREAT | O_RDWR, 0600);
>> >> + if (type == FILE_SHMEM)
>> >> + fd = shm_open(filename, O_CREAT | O_RDWR, 0600);
>> >> + else
>> >> + fd = open(filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC, 0666);
>> >>
>> >> if (fd < 0) {
>> >> - ksft_print_msg("Unable to create shmem file.\n");
>> >> + ksft_print_msg("Unable to create file.\n");
>> >> ret = false;
>> >> goto out;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> if (ftruncate(fd, filesize)) {
>> >> - ksft_print_msg("Unable to truncate shmem file.\n");
>> >> + ksft_print_msg("Unable to truncate file.\n");
>> >> ret = false;
>> >> goto close_fd;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> if (!write_exactly(fd, filesize)) {
>> >> - ksft_print_msg("Unable to write to shmem file.\n");
>> >> + ksft_print_msg("Unable to write to file.\n");
>> >> ret = false;
>> >> goto close_fd;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> + if (type == FILE_MMAP){
>> >> + char *map = mmap(NULL, filesize, PROT_READ |
>> PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
>> >> + if (map == MAP_FAILED) {
>> >> + ksft_print_msg("mmap failed.\n");
>> >> + ret = false;
>> >> + goto close_fd;
>> >> + }
>> >> + for (int i = 0; i < filesize; i++) {
>> >> + map[i] = 'A';
>> >> + }
>> >> + map[filesize - 1] = 'X';
>> >> + }
>> >> syscall_ret = syscall(__NR_cachestat, fd, &cs_range, &cs, 0);
>> >>
>> >> if (syscall_ret) {
>> >> @@ -333,7 +296,7 @@ int main(void)
>> >> ret = 1;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> - for (int i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
>> >> + for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
>> >> const char *dev_filename = dev_files[i];
>> >>
>> >> if (test_cachestat(dev_filename, false, false, false,
>> >> @@ -367,14 +330,14 @@ int main(void)
>> >> break;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> - if (test_cachestat_shmem())
>> >> + if (run_cachestat_test(FILE_SHMEM))
>> >> ksft_test_result_pass("cachestat works with a shmem
>> file\n");
>> >> else {
>> >> ksft_test_result_fail("cachestat fails with a shmem
>> file\n");
>> >> ret = 1;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> - if (test_cachestat_mmap())
>> >> + if (run_cachestat_test(FILE_MMAP))
>> >> ksft_test_result_pass("cachestat works with a mmap
>> file\n");
>> >> else {
>> >> ksft_test_result_fail("cachestat fails with a mmap
>> file\n");
>> >> --
>> >> 2.43.0
>> >>
>>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 12646 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-30 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-11 18:09 Suresh K C
2025-06-25 4:58 ` Suresh Chandrappa
2025-06-27 16:41 ` Nhat Pham
2025-06-30 17:37 ` Suresh Chandrappa
2025-06-30 17:47 ` Suresh Chandrappa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAMO5pjerVWvCQMF7huENatrwvoU+W0mvtbuR5Vzx+ninU59pw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=suresh.k.chandrappa@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox