From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1471FC433E1 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:09:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87A12067C for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="ehZtgn4/" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C87A12067C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 6449A8D000B; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 06:09:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 5CF388D0001; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 06:09:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 496D98D000B; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 06:09:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0235.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.235]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6348D0001 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 06:09:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin08.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0781824805A for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:09:51 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77170525782.08.show56_0d0a89f2702f Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A031819E621 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:09:51 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: show56_0d0a89f2702f X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5849 Received: from mail-ej1-f66.google.com (mail-ej1-f66.google.com [209.85.218.66]) by imf03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-f66.google.com with SMTP id bo3so1782543ejb.11 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 03:09:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=p7IDsCs3O3XVq6Oo36ltfbQDp/qQH17B8kNCHrYYi58=; b=ehZtgn4/AxsmBi4CkUnsCHo/q6bpQxXO/GGgvrCHjALePJV0mY03gGKLtDpnr62vq7 KV3mdnnS1aNkayPfMEd6+kiXUtw5pXZFUZ/dq+zcrKhOGKgl7b3lXQNmHHz0Fv8waUXO bUcyInFMwIZHXpvW8Pcz/o4WwKo7iyfKJp3kg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=p7IDsCs3O3XVq6Oo36ltfbQDp/qQH17B8kNCHrYYi58=; b=CR2FrUhPHPC4wOQ/kwwIM96FmWwCKyxBVhEpB2p/R6iX1zjs5xe1JZlpMJxj/dyDdI 56IpiUlLzJ3nRbj0D81ehnBLz6cVNzReN3fRY494ttwcl83DxYLeinjt70Q2ztbOASJf PSOFohuH2AOSOXCAspYJgTq6dCxoOSfFU2KDilC67//dylf8C5DN+B91o03cid5J2eWR 4niYkxacM+WklXOzmRjMlIhDQcqFMTHhGms2OAdE4C7zupOzJnCFi/vD9bNlcbrgvRsq UOJcenaRnVDy8KYwEo7fHS6X3ba9i829gxqkLlir0HhosCnJWFJ0UuPuf/yp24KDwPUK mGEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533H3YcJzJyiHSQXFYKhi+eiqE1STuJrZFxm4pCsAl3JUyq8y7p+ mZQVOk0DZMBGwWu4QVmqdU8j/097OxW5nysy X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJziHsXpjmRpQ4D5pF461JQ4jUNvs8GQI/10Fxd8BDVCEkvUZA5OSii6R6Boit80GOLbxyKh+w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1f8e:: with SMTP id t14mr2557618ejr.336.1597918189916; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 03:09:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm1-f41.google.com (mail-wm1-f41.google.com. [209.85.128.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bt20sm1007217edb.62.2020.08.20.03.09.48 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Aug 2020 03:09:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-f41.google.com with SMTP id k20so1064024wmi.5 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 03:09:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a1c:5581:: with SMTP id j123mr2797156wmb.11.1597918188072; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 03:09:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200819065555.1802761-1-hch@lst.de> <20200819065555.1802761-6-hch@lst.de> <62e4f4fc-c8a5-3ee8-c576-fe7178cb4356@arm.com> <20200819135738.GB17098@lst.de> <20200820044533.GA4570@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20200820044533.GA4570@lst.de> From: Tomasz Figa Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 12:09:34 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/28] media/v4l2: remove V4L2-FLAG-MEMORY-NON-CONSISTENT To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Robin Murphy , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Linux Doc Mailing List , nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , "James E.J. Bottomley" , linux-mm@kvack.org, Marek Szyprowski , linux-samsung-soc , Joonyoung Shim , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Kyungmin Park , Ben Skeggs , Matt Porter , Linux Media Mailing List , Tom Lendacky , Pawel Osciak , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , "list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" , Joerg Roedel , "list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS , Joerg Roedel ," , Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Seung-Woo Kim , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B5A031819E621 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 6:45 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 04:11:52PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > > By the way, as a videobuf2 reviewer, I'd appreciate being CC'd on any > > > > series related to the subsystem-facing DMA API changes, since > > > > videobuf2 is one of the biggest users of it. > > > > > > The cc list is too long - I cc lists and key maintainers. As a reviewer > > > should should watch your subsystems lists closely. > > > > Well, I guess we can disagree on this, because there is no clear > > policy. I'm listed in the MAINTAINERS file for the subsystem and I > > believe the purpose of the file is to list the people to CC on > > relevant patches. We're all overloaded with work and having to look > > through the huge volume of mailing lists like linux-media doesn't help > > and thus I'd still appreciate being added on CC. > > I'm happy to Cc and active participant in the discussion. I'm not > going to add all reviewers because even with the trimmed CC list > I'm already hitting the number of receipients limit on various lists. Fair enough. We'll make your job easier and just turn my MAINTAINERS entry into a maintainer. :) Best regards, Tomasz