linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	 Sebastian Sewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	 Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	shakeel.butt@linux.dev,  Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	 linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/6] mm, bpf: Introduce __GFP_TRYLOCK for opportunistic page allocation
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 13:42:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQK9Mxhmo+CKiedwJD3zffr5y+vzttMS47JNMKiG36Sp1A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z1fSMhHdSTpurYCW@casper.infradead.org>

On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 9:31 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 06:39:31PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > +     if (preemptible() && !rcu_preempt_depth())
> > +             return alloc_pages_node_noprof(nid,
> > +                                            GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_ZERO,
> > +                                            order);
> > +     return alloc_pages_node_noprof(nid,
> > +                                    __GFP_TRYLOCK | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ZERO,
> > +                                    order);
>
> [...]
>
> > @@ -4009,7 +4018,7 @@ gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> >        * set both ALLOC_NON_BLOCK and ALLOC_MIN_RESERVE(__GFP_HIGH).
> >        */
> >       alloc_flags |= (__force int)
> > -             (gfp_mask & (__GFP_HIGH | __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM));
> > +             (gfp_mask & (__GFP_HIGH | __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM | __GFP_TRYLOCK));
>
> It's not quite clear to me that we need __GFP_TRYLOCK to implement this.
> I was originally wondering if this wasn't a memalloc_nolock_save() /
> memalloc_nolock_restore() situation (akin to memalloc_nofs_save/restore),

Interesting idea. It could be useful to pass extra flags into free_page
path, since it doesn't have flags today and I'm adding free_pages_nolock()
in patch 2 just to pass fpi_t fpi_flags around.

memalloc_nofs_save()-like makes the most sense when there are
multiple allocations and code path attempts to be generic.
For bpf use case it's probably overkill.
I guess we might have both __GFP_TRYLOCK and
memalloc_nolock_save() that clear many flags.
Note it needs to clear __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM which is not safe
when raw spin lock is held.

> but I wonder if we can simply do:
>
>         if (!preemptible() || rcu_preempt_depth())
>                 alloc_flags |= ALLOC_TRYLOCK;

I don't think we can do that.
It will penalize existing GFP_ATOMIC/NOWAIT users.
kmalloc from RCU CS with GFP_NOWAIT is fine today.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-12-10 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-10  2:39 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] bpf, mm: Introduce __GFP_TRYLOCK Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-10  2:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/6] mm, bpf: Introduce __GFP_TRYLOCK for opportunistic page allocation Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-10  5:31   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-12-10  9:05     ` Michal Hocko
2024-12-10 20:25       ` Shakeel Butt
2024-12-11 10:08         ` Michal Hocko
2024-12-10 22:06       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-11 10:19         ` Michal Hocko
2024-12-12 15:07         ` Sebastian Sewior
2024-12-12 15:21           ` Michal Hocko
2024-12-12 15:35             ` Sebastian Sewior
2024-12-12 15:48               ` Steven Rostedt
2024-12-12 16:00                 ` Sebastian Sewior
2024-12-13 17:44                   ` Steven Rostedt
2024-12-13 18:44                     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-13 18:57                       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-13 20:09                       ` Steven Rostedt
2024-12-13 21:00                         ` Steven Rostedt
2024-12-13 22:02                           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-12 21:57               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-10 21:42     ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2024-12-10  9:01   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-10 21:53     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-11  8:38       ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-12  2:14         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-12  8:54           ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-10 18:39   ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-10 22:42     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-11  8:48       ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-10  2:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/6] mm, bpf: Introduce free_pages_nolock() Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-10  8:35   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-10 22:49     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-12 14:44       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-12 19:57         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-11 10:11   ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-12  1:43     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-10  2:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/6] locking/local_lock: Introduce local_trylock_irqsave() Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-11 10:53   ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-11 11:55     ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-12  2:49       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-12  9:15         ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-13 14:02           ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-12 15:15   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-12 19:59     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-10  2:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/6] memcg: Add __GFP_TRYLOCK support Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-11 23:47   ` kernel test robot
2024-12-10  2:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/6] mm, bpf: Use __GFP_ACCOUNT in try_alloc_pages() Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-11 12:05   ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-12-12  2:54     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-12-10  2:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/6] bpf: Use try_alloc_pages() to allocate pages for bpf needs Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAADnVQK9Mxhmo+CKiedwJD3zffr5y+vzttMS47JNMKiG36Sp1A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox