linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	 linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,  Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Sebastian Sewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH slab v5 5/6] slab: Reuse first bit for OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 18:12:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQJQo6+AwJ_LxARVu37J-5T-7tyn1kA5hMVDGDfEyjF6mQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuCfpHJEUypV2HWRHqE598kr-1Nz_DokMz_UgrUnq8YkFcb9w@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 5:36 PM Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Suren is
> > > > fixing the condition of VM_BUG_ON_PAGE() in slab_obj_exts(). With this
> > > > patch, I think, that condition will need to be changed again.
> > >
> > > That's orthogonal and I'm not convinced it's correct.
> > > slab_obj_exts() is doing the right thing. afaict.
> >
> > Currently we have
> >
> > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(obj_exts && !(obj_exts & MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS))
> >
> > but it should be (before your patch) something like:
> >
> > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(obj_exts && !(obj_exts & (MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS | OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL)))
> >
> > After your patch, hmmm, the previous one would be right again and the
> > newer one will be the same as the previous due to aliasing. This patch
> > doesn't need to touch that VM_BUG. Older kernels will need to move to
> > the second condition though.
>
> Correct. Currently slab_obj_exts() will issue a warning when (obj_exts
> == OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL), which is a perfectly valid state indicating
> that previous allocation of the vector failed due to memory
> exhaustion. Changing that warning to:
>
> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(obj_exts && !(obj_exts & (MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS |
> OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL)))
>
> will correctly avoid this warning and after your change will still
> work. (MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS | OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL) when
> (MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS == OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL) is technically unnecessary
> but is good for documenting the conditions we are checking.

I see what you mean. I feel the comment in slab_obj_exts()
that explains all that would be better long term than decipher
from C code. Both are fine, I guess.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-13  1:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-09  1:00 [PATCH slab v5 0/6] slab: Re-entrant kmalloc_nolock() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-09  1:00 ` [PATCH slab v5 1/6] locking/local_lock: Introduce local_lock_is_locked() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-09  1:00 ` [PATCH slab v5 2/6] mm: Allow GFP_ACCOUNT to be used in alloc_pages_nolock() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-12 17:11   ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-12 17:15     ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-09-12 17:34       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-12 17:46         ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-12 17:47   ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-15  5:25   ` Harry Yoo
2025-09-09  1:00 ` [PATCH slab v5 3/6] mm: Introduce alloc_frozen_pages_nolock() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-12 17:15   ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-15  5:17   ` Harry Yoo
2025-09-09  1:00 ` [PATCH slab v5 4/6] slab: Make slub local_(try)lock more precise for LOCKDEP Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-09  1:00 ` [PATCH slab v5 5/6] slab: Reuse first bit for OBJEXTS_ALLOC_FAIL Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-12 19:27   ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-12 21:03     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-09-12 21:11       ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-12 21:26         ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-09-12 21:24       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-12 21:29         ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-12 21:31           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-12 21:44             ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-12 21:59               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-13  0:01                 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-13  0:07                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-13  0:33                     ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-13  0:36                       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-09-13  1:12                         ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2025-09-15  7:51                           ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-15 15:06                             ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-09-15 15:11                               ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-15 15:25                                 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-09-15 20:10                                   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-09-13  1:16   ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-15  6:14   ` Harry Yoo
2025-09-09  1:00 ` [PATCH slab v5 6/6] slab: Introduce kmalloc_nolock() and kfree_nolock() Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-15 12:52   ` Harry Yoo
2025-09-15 14:39     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-16  0:56       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-16  9:55         ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-16  1:00     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-24  0:40   ` Harry Yoo
2025-09-24  7:43     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-24 11:07       ` Harry Yoo
2025-09-12  9:33 ` [PATCH slab v5 0/6] slab: Re-entrant kmalloc_nolock() Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAADnVQJQo6+AwJ_LxARVu37J-5T-7tyn1kA5hMVDGDfEyjF6mQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox