linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
Cc: dchinner@redhat.com, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 00/16] kmemcg shrinkers
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:02:26 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA6-i6rSE+PvnvmnE_6jBZvsJ+ZJmX1pSwPBE_JZw-OTotNSxQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1386571280.git.vdavydov@parallels.com>

> Please note that in contrast to previous versions this patch-set implements
> slab shrinking only when we hit the user memory limit so that kmem allocations
> will still fail if we are below the user memory limit, but close to the kmem
> limit. This is, because the implementation of kmem-only reclaim was rather
> incomplete - we had to fail GFP_NOFS allocations since everything we could
> reclaim was only FS data. I will try to improve this and send in a separate
> patch-set, but currently it is only worthwhile setting the kmem limit to be
> greater than the user mem limit just to enable per-memcg slab accounting and
> reclaim.

That is unfortunate, but it makes sense as a first step.



-- 
E Mare, Libertas

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-12-10  8:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-09  8:05 Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-09  8:05 ` [PATCH v13 01/16] memcg: make cache index determination more robust Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-09  8:05 ` [PATCH v13 02/16] memcg: consolidate callers of memcg_cache_id Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-09  8:05 ` [PATCH v13 03/16] memcg: move initialization to memcg creation Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-09  8:05 ` [PATCH v13 04/16] memcg: move memcg_caches_array_size() function Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-10  8:04   ` Glauber Costa
2013-12-09  8:05 ` [PATCH v13 05/16] vmscan: move call to shrink_slab() to shrink_zones() Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-10  8:10   ` Glauber Costa
2013-12-09  8:05 ` [PATCH v13 06/16] vmscan: remove shrink_control arg from do_try_to_free_pages() Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-09  8:05 ` [PATCH v13 07/16] vmscan: call NUMA-unaware shrinkers irrespective of nodemask Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-09  8:05 ` [PATCH v13 08/16] mm: list_lru: require shrink_control in count, walk functions Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-10  1:36   ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-09  8:05 ` [PATCH v13 09/16] fs: consolidate {nr,free}_cached_objects args in shrink_control Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-10  1:38   ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-09  8:05 ` [PATCH v13 10/16] vmscan: shrink slab on memcg pressure Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-10  2:11   ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-09  8:05 ` [PATCH v13 11/16] mm: list_lru: add per-memcg lists Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-10  5:00   ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-10 10:05     ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-12  1:40       ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-12  9:50         ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-12 20:24           ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-14 20:03             ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-12 20:48     ` Glauber Costa
2013-12-09  8:05 ` [PATCH v13 12/16] fs: mark list_lru based shrinkers memcg aware Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-10  4:17   ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-11 11:08     ` Steven Whitehouse
2013-12-09  8:05 ` [PATCH v13 13/16] vmscan: take at least one pass with shrinkers Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-10  4:18   ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-10 11:50     ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-10 12:38       ` Glauber Costa
2013-12-09  8:05 ` [PATCH v13 14/16] vmpressure: in-kernel notifications Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-10  8:12   ` Glauber Costa
2013-12-09  8:05 ` [PATCH v13 15/16] memcg: reap dead memcgs upon global memory pressure Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-09  8:05 ` [PATCH v13 16/16] memcg: flush memcg items upon memcg destruction Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-10  8:02 ` Glauber Costa [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAA6-i6rSE+PvnvmnE_6jBZvsJ+ZJmX1pSwPBE_JZw-OTotNSxQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=glommer@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=glommer@openvz.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox