From: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, dvyukov@google.com,
glider@google.com, ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: kasan_test: disable fortify string checker on kmalloc_oob_memset
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:42:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA1CXcBdNd0rSW+oAm24hpEj5SM48XGc2AWagRcSDNv96axQ9w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+fCnZeE1g7F6UDruw-3v5eTO9u_jcROG4Hbndz8Bnr62Opnyg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 7:34 AM Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 12:27 AM Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > similar to commit 09c6304e38e4 ("kasan: test: fix compatibility with
> > FORTIFY_SOURCE") the kernel is panicing in kmalloc_oob_memset_*.
> >
> > This is due to the `ptr` not being hidden from the optimizer which would
> > disable the runtime fortify string checker.
> >
> > kernel BUG at lib/string_helpers.c:1048!
> > Call Trace:
> > [<00000000272502e2>] fortify_panic+0x2a/0x30
> > ([<00000000272502de>] fortify_panic+0x26/0x30)
> > [<001bffff817045c4>] kmalloc_oob_memset_2+0x22c/0x230 [kasan_test]
> >
> > Hide the `ptr` variable from the optimizer to fix the kernel panic.
> > Also define a size2 variable and hide that as well. This cleans up
> > the code and follows the same convention as other tests.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > mm/kasan/kasan_test.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/kasan/kasan_test.c b/mm/kasan/kasan_test.c
> > index 8281eb42464b..5aeba810ba70 100644
> > --- a/mm/kasan/kasan_test.c
> > +++ b/mm/kasan/kasan_test.c
> > @@ -493,14 +493,17 @@ static void kmalloc_oob_memset_2(struct kunit *test)
> > {
> > char *ptr;
> > size_t size = 128 - KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE;
> > + size_t size2 = 2;
>
> Let's name this variable access_size or memset_size. Here and in the
> other changed tests.
Hi Andrey,
I agree that is a better variable name, but I chose size2 because
other kasan tests follow the same pattern.
Please let me know if you still want me to update it given that info
and I'll send a V2.
Cheers,
-- Nico
>
> > KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CHECKED_MEMINTRINSICS(test);
> >
> > ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
> >
> > + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
> > OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size);
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr + size - 1, 0, 2));
> > + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size2);
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr + size - 1, 0, size2));
> > kfree(ptr);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -508,14 +511,17 @@ static void kmalloc_oob_memset_4(struct kunit *test)
> > {
> > char *ptr;
> > size_t size = 128 - KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE;
> > + size_t size2 = 4;
> >
> > KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CHECKED_MEMINTRINSICS(test);
> >
> > ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
> >
> > + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
> > OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size);
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr + size - 3, 0, 4));
> > + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size2);
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr + size - 3, 0, size2));
> > kfree(ptr);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -523,14 +529,17 @@ static void kmalloc_oob_memset_8(struct kunit *test)
> > {
> > char *ptr;
> > size_t size = 128 - KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE;
> > + size_t size2 = 8;
> >
> > KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CHECKED_MEMINTRINSICS(test);
> >
> > ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
> >
> > + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
> > OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size);
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr + size - 7, 0, 8));
> > + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size2);
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr + size - 7, 0, size2));
> > kfree(ptr);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -538,14 +547,17 @@ static void kmalloc_oob_memset_16(struct kunit *test)
> > {
> > char *ptr;
> > size_t size = 128 - KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE;
> > + size_t size2 = 16;
> >
> > KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CHECKED_MEMINTRINSICS(test);
> >
> > ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
> >
> > + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
> > OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size);
> > - KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr + size - 15, 0, 16));
> > + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size2);
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr + size - 15, 0, size2));
> > kfree(ptr);
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
>
> With the fix mentioned above addressed:
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-13 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-12 23:26 Nico Pache
2023-12-13 14:34 ` Andrey Konovalov
2023-12-13 21:42 ` Nico Pache [this message]
2023-12-13 23:42 ` Andrey Konovalov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA1CXcBdNd0rSW+oAm24hpEj5SM48XGc2AWagRcSDNv96axQ9w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox