From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
To: Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov <snovitoll@gmail.com>
Cc: ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com, glider@google.com, dvyukov@google.com,
vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
bhe@redhat.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
ritesh.list@gmail.com, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kasan: cleanup of kasan_enabled() checks
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 01:07:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+fCnZeqtp2jqa7YTzDSbCkhso3dAaMGSEcmVtzU+Mrobark8w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251009155403.1379150-3-snovitoll@gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 5:54 PM Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov <snovitoll@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Deduplication of kasan_enabled() checks which are already used by callers.
>
> * Altered functions:
>
> check_page_allocation
> Delete the check because callers have it already in __wrappers in
> include/linux/kasan.h:
> __kasan_kfree_large
> __kasan_mempool_poison_pages
> __kasan_mempool_poison_object
>
> kasan_populate_vmalloc, kasan_release_vmalloc
> Add __wrappers in include/linux/kasan.h.
> They are called externally in mm/vmalloc.c.
>
> __kasan_unpoison_vmalloc, __kasan_poison_vmalloc
> Delete checks because there're already kasan_enabled() checks
> in respective __wrappers in include/linux/kasan.h.
>
> release_free_meta -- Delete the check because the higher caller path
> has it already. See the stack trace:
>
> __kasan_slab_free -- has the check already
> __kasan_mempool_poison_object -- has the check already
> poison_slab_object
> kasan_save_free_info
> release_free_meta
> kasan_enabled() -- Delete here
>
> Signed-off-by: Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov <snovitoll@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/kasan.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> mm/kasan/common.c | 3 ---
> mm/kasan/generic.c | 3 ---
> mm/kasan/shadow.c | 20 ++++----------------
> 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kasan.h b/include/linux/kasan.h
> index d12e1a5f5a9..f335c1d7b61 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kasan.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kasan.h
> @@ -571,11 +571,27 @@ static inline void kasan_init_hw_tags(void) { }
> #if defined(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC) || defined(CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS)
>
> void kasan_populate_early_vm_area_shadow(void *start, unsigned long size);
> -int kasan_populate_vmalloc(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size, gfp_t gfp_mask);
> -void kasan_release_vmalloc(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> +int __kasan_populate_vmalloc(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size, gfp_t gfp_mask);
> +static inline int kasan_populate_vmalloc(unsigned long addr,
> + unsigned long size, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> +{
> + if (kasan_enabled())
> + return __kasan_populate_vmalloc(addr, size, gfp_mask);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +void __kasan_release_vmalloc(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> unsigned long free_region_start,
> unsigned long free_region_end,
> unsigned long flags);
> +static inline void kasan_release_vmalloc(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> + unsigned long free_region_start,
> + unsigned long free_region_end,
> + unsigned long flags)
> +{
> + if (kasan_enabled())
> + return __kasan_release_vmalloc(start, end, free_region_start,
> + free_region_end, flags);
> +}
>
> #else /* CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC || CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS */
>
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/common.c b/mm/kasan/common.c
> index d4c14359fea..22e5d67ff06 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/common.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/common.c
> @@ -305,9 +305,6 @@ bool __kasan_slab_free(struct kmem_cache *cache, void *object, bool init,
>
> static inline bool check_page_allocation(void *ptr, unsigned long ip)
> {
> - if (!kasan_enabled())
> - return false;
> -
> if (ptr != page_address(virt_to_head_page(ptr))) {
> kasan_report_invalid_free(ptr, ip, KASAN_REPORT_INVALID_FREE);
> return true;
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/generic.c b/mm/kasan/generic.c
> index 516b49accc4..2b8e73f5f6a 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/generic.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/generic.c
> @@ -506,9 +506,6 @@ static void release_alloc_meta(struct kasan_alloc_meta *meta)
>
> static void release_free_meta(const void *object, struct kasan_free_meta *meta)
> {
> - if (!kasan_enabled())
> - return;
> -
> /* Check if free meta is valid. */
> if (*(u8 *)kasan_mem_to_shadow(object) != KASAN_SLAB_FREE_META)
> return;
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/shadow.c b/mm/kasan/shadow.c
> index 5d2a876035d..cf842b620a2 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/shadow.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/shadow.c
> @@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ static int ___alloc_pages_bulk(struct page **pages, int nr_pages, gfp_t gfp_mask
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int __kasan_populate_vmalloc(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> +static int __kasan_populate_vmalloc_do(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> unsigned long nr_pages, nr_total = PFN_UP(end - start);
> struct vmalloc_populate_data data;
> @@ -403,14 +403,11 @@ static int __kasan_populate_vmalloc(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, gfp_
> return ret;
> }
>
> -int kasan_populate_vmalloc(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> +int __kasan_populate_vmalloc(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> unsigned long shadow_start, shadow_end;
> int ret;
>
> - if (!kasan_enabled())
> - return 0;
> -
> if (!is_vmalloc_or_module_addr((void *)addr))
> return 0;
>
> @@ -432,7 +429,7 @@ int kasan_populate_vmalloc(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size, gfp_t gfp_mas
> shadow_start = PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN(shadow_start);
> shadow_end = PAGE_ALIGN(shadow_end);
>
> - ret = __kasan_populate_vmalloc(shadow_start, shadow_end, gfp_mask);
> + ret = __kasan_populate_vmalloc_do(shadow_start, shadow_end, gfp_mask);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -574,7 +571,7 @@ static int kasan_depopulate_vmalloc_pte(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr,
> * pages entirely covered by the free region, we will not run in to any
> * trouble - any simultaneous allocations will be for disjoint regions.
> */
> -void kasan_release_vmalloc(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> +void __kasan_release_vmalloc(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> unsigned long free_region_start,
> unsigned long free_region_end,
> unsigned long flags)
> @@ -583,9 +580,6 @@ void kasan_release_vmalloc(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> unsigned long region_start, region_end;
> unsigned long size;
>
> - if (!kasan_enabled())
> - return;
> -
> region_start = ALIGN(start, KASAN_MEMORY_PER_SHADOW_PAGE);
> region_end = ALIGN_DOWN(end, KASAN_MEMORY_PER_SHADOW_PAGE);
>
> @@ -634,9 +628,6 @@ void *__kasan_unpoison_vmalloc(const void *start, unsigned long size,
> * with setting memory tags, so the KASAN_VMALLOC_INIT flag is ignored.
> */
>
> - if (!kasan_enabled())
> - return (void *)start;
> -
> if (!is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(start))
> return (void *)start;
>
> @@ -659,9 +650,6 @@ void *__kasan_unpoison_vmalloc(const void *start, unsigned long size,
> */
> void __kasan_poison_vmalloc(const void *start, unsigned long size)
> {
> - if (!kasan_enabled())
> - return;
> -
> if (!is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(start))
> return;
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Awesome, thank you!
I believe the check in kasan_byte_accessible() can be just removed as
well? If you do, please run the tests to be sure.
As for the other three (check_inline_region(), kasan_poison(), and
kasan_poison_last_granule()) - perhaps, we can leave them be.
Otherwise, we would need to duplicate the kasan_enabled() checks in a
lot of compiler-inserted functions.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-21 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-09 15:54 [PATCH 0/2] kasan: cleanups for " Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2025-10-09 15:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] kasan: remove __kasan_save_free_info wrapper Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2025-10-21 23:07 ` Andrey Konovalov
2025-10-09 15:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] kasan: cleanup of kasan_enabled() checks Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov
2025-10-21 23:07 ` Andrey Konovalov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+fCnZeqtp2jqa7YTzDSbCkhso3dAaMGSEcmVtzU+Mrobark8w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=snovitoll@gmail.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox