From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
To: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Feng Tang <feng.79.tang@gmail.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slab: ensure all metadata in slab object are word-aligned
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 16:17:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+fCnZeMwOE1EwuP-3Xrs2e0qp_A5eo2aiXB_q243GiLFZV-=Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aPs6Na_GUhRzPW7v@hyeyoo>
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 10:35 AM Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> > An alternative to unpoisoning or disabling KASAN could be to add
> > helper functions annotated with __no_sanitize_address that do the
> > required accesses. And make them inlined when KASAN is disabled to
> > avoid the performance hit.
>
> This sounds reasonable, let me try this instead of unpoisoning
> metadata. Thanks.
But note that you still need kasan_reset_tag() for HW_TAGS KASAN: this
mode is not based on compiler instrumentation and thus
__no_sanitize_address has no effect on it.
(There's been some discussion on making __no_sanitize_address work for
HW_TAGS: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212513#c2, but
this was never attempted.)
> > On a side note, you might also need to check whether SW_TAGS KASAN and
> > KMSAN would be unhappy with your changes:
> >
> > - When we do kasan_disable_current() or metadata_access_enable(), we
> > also do kasan_reset_tag();
> > - In metadata_access_enable(), we disable KMSAN as well.
>
> Thanks for pointing this out!
>
> Just to clarify, by calling kasan_reset_tag() we clear tag from the address
> so that SW or HW tag based KASAN won't report access violation? (because
> there is no valid tag in the address?)
Yeah, kind of: kasan_reset_tag() sets the pointer tag (the top byte)
to 0xFF. With SW_TAGS KASAN, the compiler knows not to embed validity
checks for accesses through pointers with 0xFF in the top byte. With
HW_TAGS KASAN, the CPU is instructed to behave the same.
(This is slightly different than kasan_disable_current(): with
kasan_reset_tag(), validity checks do not happen at all. With
kasan_disable_current(), the checks happen but the bug reports are
ignored.)
Thank you!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-24 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-23 13:16 Harry Yoo
2025-10-24 0:40 ` Harry Yoo
2025-10-24 1:19 ` Andrey Konovalov
2025-10-24 1:35 ` Andrey Konovalov
2025-10-24 1:56 ` Andrey Konovalov
2025-10-24 7:55 ` Harry Yoo
2025-10-24 8:35 ` Harry Yoo
2025-10-24 14:17 ` Andrey Konovalov [this message]
2025-10-24 1:19 ` Andrey Konovalov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+fCnZeMwOE1EwuP-3Xrs2e0qp_A5eo2aiXB_q243GiLFZV-=Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=feng.79.tang@gmail.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox