Hello. I apologize. Please ignore this patch and email. Wanted to send it to one person, instead git send-email also handled some emails from commit footer. -- Vlad Rezki On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 1:11 PM Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote: > Rename kvfree_rcu() function to the kvfree_rcu_local() one. The aim is > to introduce the public API that would conflict with this one. So we > temporarily rename it and remove it in a later commit. > > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org > Cc: Andrew Morton > Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) > Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) > --- > mm/list_lru.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c > index 4d5294c39bba..42c95bcb53ca 100644 > --- a/mm/list_lru.c > +++ b/mm/list_lru.c > @@ -373,14 +373,14 @@ static void memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(struct > list_lru_node *nlru) > struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus; > /* > * This is called when shrinker has already been unregistered, > - * and nobody can use it. So, there is no need to use kvfree_rcu(). > + * and nobody can use it. So, there is no need to use > kvfree_rcu_local(). > */ > memcg_lrus = rcu_dereference_protected(nlru->memcg_lrus, true); > __memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(memcg_lrus, 0, memcg_nr_cache_ids); > kvfree(memcg_lrus); > } > > -static void kvfree_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) > +static void kvfree_rcu_local(struct rcu_head *head) > { > struct list_lru_memcg *mlru; > > @@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ static int memcg_update_list_lru_node(struct > list_lru_node *nlru, > rcu_assign_pointer(nlru->memcg_lrus, new); > spin_unlock_irq(&nlru->lock); > > - call_rcu(&old->rcu, kvfree_rcu); > + call_rcu(&old->rcu, kvfree_rcu_local); > return 0; > } > > -- > 2.20.1 > > -- Uladzislau Rezki