From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03506C43334 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 68DBF8D0002; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 06:28:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 5EFB76B0080; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 06:28:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 446038D0002; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 06:28:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0014.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.14]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF0C6B007E for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 06:28:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin01.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04FDECB0 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:28:04 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79551064530.01.59614C4 Received: from mail-yb1-f171.google.com (mail-yb1-f171.google.com [209.85.219.171]) by imf18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB3A1C0062 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:27:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yb1-f171.google.com with SMTP id y188so902810ybe.11 for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 03:28:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lLb4OstT3sRsRSOzWSrE/P7lW42UYdWQsdQ0kmyUq3w=; b=pCE60kVDw2MImA3LMLKXGPwLWoHbYh3JLP0GUT87HFqfaKmFBv/ReQSW0JJHa/Ix53 dH+UtzW9JX977Qi0MrS3OXG5uD485M/CUkNH068x00Uxuoe52+M2BjozYvWdP7TyXUlq ByKNbzCe6n4lAvFnOcfrQ3ASctplUIjZ0CTh+40kssFrI1FdW6D7pEQC4bd7q7dXi1xI Z0YFyCFhZgKWp+TkKtnp5UsUenGdtau3pTfr7bTveX32n903KMJ4gFQv4hSUlraiX18k P5OD/58Kj9LqVbwv9staYVQYt6fG58glp/46sWLLwIdoFfoZCTtNHUNG0WNk5ent5wvD XIlw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lLb4OstT3sRsRSOzWSrE/P7lW42UYdWQsdQ0kmyUq3w=; b=K/EL8tAbdFae9HdbAKPtu6T1iqKvNH2zSiIvfsfGWN7u4LoIn94tgR+GCn9dzwmAe2 jO3HgWrBoj1laxkWM5blaC55xR2YbdHFWtA3PvX4MVrFuVbljkmsz5p73/Fdhg3OO55z 5Y1kDcnPEJw9mZoeWfi6R9otEhn2bMK8pscOrmySCNmv4wUFk96Xj1DDhlm0GWNKqg6L iNLtYuXkmWd3cFDvq/5cW0AP0GzWjRb0gAW6v9sasgKABGMvbKZO4B3jcESeFOLtkKQc lpYNmVVhgVoqhfHQyBmK7ddlCSmiVfQBINoQGEh9zcfG73ugKMU5iiSaiYKFdeIcr0Id IEqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533emU7v09mRdfhW7Q/DHtlNBqDNYVCvqDHYf+tt4jaLTqgwfL28 AjtxOLhWcypR00S0eqMarLo4n9GEWEjcEFlp4mwHBg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwKT2UmpuK+kDxqDiEIkG8TF0esYpFi4IVr32ervm1z3rjq6TIlEmUWrJNsgH3MWaBpO5f9Rfu/L0y/NukH9mc= X-Received: by 2002:a25:4705:0:b0:65d:43f8:5652 with SMTP id u5-20020a254705000000b0065d43f85652mr28527025yba.389.1654597683604; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 03:28:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220607162504.7fd5a92a@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: From: Naresh Kamboju Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 15:57:52 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [next] arm64: boot failed - next-20220606 To: Shakeel Butt Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux-Next Mailing List , open list , regressions@lists.linux.dev, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, Linux ARM , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Ard Biesheuvel , Arnd Bergmann , Catalin Marinas , Raghuram Thammiraju , Mark Brown , Will Deacon , Roman Gushchin , Vasily Averin , Qian Cai Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Stat-Signature: qaxoyc4fy6tw4c8j5g1q7uz5zeqoiowg X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf18.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linaro.org header.s=google header.b=pCE60kVD; spf=pass (imf18.hostedemail.com: domain of naresh.kamboju@linaro.org designates 209.85.219.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=linaro.org X-Rspamd-Server: rspam12 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: EEB3A1C0062 X-HE-Tag: 1654597661-680176 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Shakeel, > > > Can you test v5.19-rc1, please? If that does not fail, then you could > > > bisect between that and next-20220606 ... > > > > > > > This is already reported at > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yp4F6n2Ie32re7Ed@qian/ and I think we know > > the underlying issue (which is calling virt_to_page() on a vmalloc > > address). > > Sorry, I might be wrong. Just checked the stacktrace again and it > seems like the failure is happening in early boot in this report. > Though the error "Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual > address" is happening in the function mem_cgroup_from_obj(). > > Naresh, can you repro the issue if you revert the patch "net: set > proper memcg for net_init hooks allocations"? yes. You are right ! 19ee3818b7c6 ("net: set proper memcg for net_init hooks allocations") After reverting this single commit I am able to boot arm64 successfully. Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org