From: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
To: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, chenhuacai@kernel.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, anup@brainfault.org,
paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, seanjc@google.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org,
willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
xiaoyao.li@intel.com, yilun.xu@intel.com,
chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, jarkko@kernel.org,
amoorthy@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
isaku.yamahata@intel.com, mic@digikod.net, vbabka@suse.cz,
vannapurve@google.com, mail@maciej.szmigiero.name,
david@redhat.com, michael.roth@amd.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
liam.merwick@oracle.com, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
steven.price@arm.com, quic_eberman@quicinc.com,
quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com, quic_tsoni@quicinc.com,
quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com, quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com,
quic_pderrin@quicinc.com, quic_pheragu@quicinc.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, maz@kernel.org,
will@kernel.org, qperret@google.com, keirf@google.com,
roypat@amazon.co.uk, shuah@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
jgg@nvidia.com, rientjes@google.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
fvdl@google.com, hughd@google.com, jthoughton@google.com,
peterx@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 9/9] KVM: guest_memfd: selftests: guest_memfd mmap() test when mapping is allowed
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 09:56:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+EHjTy7CT0k+m30KfEeV5W6fV-nW1VMXsPYGLhaCmrEaKOf7g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <diqz34er23ql.fsf@ackerleytng-ctop.c.googlers.com>
Hi Ackerley,
On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 at 18:25, Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com> wrote:
>
> Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> writes:
>
> > Expand the guest_memfd selftests to include testing mapping guest
> > memory for VM types that support it.
> >
> > Also, build the guest_memfd selftest for arm64.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm | 1 +
> > .../testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++--
> > 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
> > index 4277b983cace..c9a3f30e28dd 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
> > @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += coalesced_io_test
> > TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += demand_paging_test
> > TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += dirty_log_test
> > TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += dirty_log_perf_test
> > +TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += guest_memfd_test
> > TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += guest_print_test
> > TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += get-reg-list
> > TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += kvm_create_max_vcpus
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
> > index ce687f8d248f..38c501e49e0e 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
> > @@ -34,12 +34,48 @@ static void test_file_read_write(int fd)
> > "pwrite on a guest_mem fd should fail");
> > }
> >
> > -static void test_mmap(int fd, size_t page_size)
> > +static void test_mmap_allowed(int fd, size_t total_size)
> > {
> > + size_t page_size = getpagesize();
> > + const char val = 0xaa;
> > + char *mem;
> > + int ret;
> > + int i;
>
> Was using this test with hugetlb patches - int i was overflowing and
> causing test failures. Perhaps use size_t i for this instead?
I need to think big, or rather, huge (sorry :)) . Will fix this.
Cheers,
/fuad
> > +
> > + mem = mmap(NULL, total_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
> > + TEST_ASSERT(mem != MAP_FAILED, "mmaping() guest memory should pass.");
> > +
> > + memset(mem, val, total_size);
> > + for (i = 0; i < total_size; i++)
> > + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(mem[i], val);
> > +
> > + ret = fallocate(fd, FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE, 0,
> > + page_size);
> > + TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "fallocate the first page should succeed");
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < page_size; i++)
> > + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(mem[i], 0x00);
> > + for (; i < total_size; i++)
> > + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(mem[i], val);
> > +
> > + memset(mem, val, total_size);
> > + for (i = 0; i < total_size; i++)
> > + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(mem[i], val);
> > +
> > + ret = munmap(mem, total_size);
> > + TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "munmap should succeed");
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void test_mmap_denied(int fd, size_t total_size)
> > +{
> > + size_t page_size = getpagesize();
> > char *mem;
> >
> > mem = mmap(NULL, page_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
> > TEST_ASSERT_EQ(mem, MAP_FAILED);
> > +
> > + mem = mmap(NULL, total_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
> > + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(mem, MAP_FAILED);
> > }
> >
> > static void test_file_size(int fd, size_t page_size, size_t total_size)
> > @@ -170,19 +206,27 @@ static void test_create_guest_memfd_multiple(struct kvm_vm *vm)
> > close(fd1);
> > }
> >
> > -int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > +unsigned long get_shared_type(void)
> > {
> > - size_t page_size;
> > +#ifdef __x86_64__
> > + return KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM;
> > +#endif
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void test_vm_type(unsigned long type, bool is_shared)
> > +{
> > + struct kvm_vm *vm;
> > size_t total_size;
> > + size_t page_size;
> > int fd;
> > - struct kvm_vm *vm;
> >
> > TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD));
> >
> > page_size = getpagesize();
> > total_size = page_size * 4;
> >
> > - vm = vm_create_barebones();
> > + vm = vm_create_barebones_type(type);
> >
> > test_create_guest_memfd_invalid(vm);
> > test_create_guest_memfd_multiple(vm);
> > @@ -190,10 +234,29 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > fd = vm_create_guest_memfd(vm, total_size, 0);
> >
> > test_file_read_write(fd);
> > - test_mmap(fd, page_size);
> > +
> > + if (is_shared)
> > + test_mmap_allowed(fd, total_size);
> > + else
> > + test_mmap_denied(fd, total_size);
> > +
> > test_file_size(fd, page_size, total_size);
> > test_fallocate(fd, page_size, total_size);
> > test_invalid_punch_hole(fd, page_size, total_size);
> >
> > close(fd);
> > + kvm_vm_release(vm);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > +{
> > +#ifndef __aarch64__
> > + /* For now, arm64 only supports shared guest memory. */
> > + test_vm_type(VM_TYPE_DEFAULT, false);
> > +#endif
> > +
> > + if (kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_GMEM_SHARED_MEM))
> > + test_vm_type(get_shared_type(), true);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > }
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-02 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-18 16:18 [PATCH v7 0/9] KVM: Mapping guest_memfd backed memory at the host for software protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2025-03-18 16:18 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] mm: Consolidate freeing of typed folios on final folio_put() Fuad Tabba
2025-04-14 10:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-14 10:15 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-18 16:18 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Handle final folio_put() of guest_memfd pages Fuad Tabba
2025-04-14 10:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-18 16:18 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Allow host to map guest_memfd() pages Fuad Tabba
2025-04-08 12:04 ` Shivank Garg
2025-04-08 13:17 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-04-08 16:58 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-04-09 7:17 ` Shivank Garg
2025-04-10 22:44 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-04-11 10:34 ` Shivank Garg
2025-04-14 10:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-14 10:15 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-18 16:18 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Handle in-place shared memory as guest_memfd backed memory Fuad Tabba
2025-04-14 11:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-14 16:03 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-04-14 19:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-15 13:51 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-04-15 17:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-14 18:07 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-04-14 20:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-15 21:50 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-04-16 12:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-16 12:30 ` Patrick Roy
2025-04-16 12:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-18 16:18 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] KVM: x86: Mark KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM as supporting guest_memfd shared memory Fuad Tabba
2025-03-26 14:42 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-18 16:18 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] KVM: arm64: Refactor user_mem_abort() calculation of force_pte Fuad Tabba
2025-03-18 16:18 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] KVM: arm64: Handle guest_memfd()-backed guest page faults Fuad Tabba
2025-03-18 16:18 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] KVM: arm64: Enable mapping guest_memfd in arm64 Fuad Tabba
2025-03-18 16:18 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] KVM: guest_memfd: selftests: guest_memfd mmap() test when mapping is allowed Fuad Tabba
2025-04-01 17:25 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-04-02 8:56 ` Fuad Tabba [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+EHjTy7CT0k+m30KfEeV5W6fV-nW1VMXsPYGLhaCmrEaKOf7g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tabba@google.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amoorthy@google.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=fvdl@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=keirf@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_eberman@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pderrin@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pheragu@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_tsoni@quicinc.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roypat@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox