linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
To: "Roy, Patrick" <roypat@amazon.co.uk>
Cc: "david@redhat.com" <david@redhat.com>,
	"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
	 "ackerleytng@google.com" <ackerleytng@google.com>,
	"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	 "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	 "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	 "kvmarm@lists.linux.dev" <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
	 "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	 "rppt@kernel.org" <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	"vbabka@suse.cz" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	 "Cali, Marco" <xmarcalx@amazon.co.uk>,
	"Kalyazin, Nikita" <kalyazin@amazon.co.uk>,
	 "Thomson, Jack" <jackabt@amazon.co.uk>,
	"Manwaring, Derek" <derekmn@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/12] mm: introduce AS_NO_DIRECT_MAP
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 11:21:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+EHjTxOmDJkwjSvAUr2O4yqEkyqeQ=_p3E5Uj5yQrPW7Qz_HA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250828093902.2719-4-roypat@amazon.co.uk>

Hi Patrick,

On Thu, 28 Aug 2025 at 10:39, Roy, Patrick <roypat@amazon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Add AS_NO_DIRECT_MAP for mappings where direct map entries of folios are
> set to not present . Currently, mappings that match this description are
> secretmem mappings (memfd_secret()). Later, some guest_memfd
> configurations will also fall into this category.
>
> Reject this new type of mappings in all locations that currently reject
> secretmem mappings, on the assumption that if secretmem mappings are
> rejected somewhere, it is precisely because of an inability to deal with
> folios without direct map entries, and then make memfd_secret() use
> AS_NO_DIRECT_MAP on its address_space to drop its special
> vma_is_secretmem()/secretmem_mapping() checks.
>
> This drops a optimization in gup_fast_folio_allowed() where
> secretmem_mapping() was only called if CONFIG_SECRETMEM=y. secretmem is
> enabled by default since commit b758fe6df50d ("mm/secretmem: make it on
> by default"), so the secretmem check did not actually end up elided in
> most cases anymore anyway.
>
> Use a new flag instead of overloading AS_INACCESSIBLE (which is already
> set by guest_memfd) because not all guest_memfd mappings will end up
> being direct map removed (e.g. in pKVM setups, parts of guest_memfd that
> can be mapped to userspace should also be GUP-able, and generally not
> have restrictions on who can access it).
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Roy <roypat@amazon.co.uk>
> ---
>  include/linux/pagemap.h   | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/secretmem.h | 18 ------------------
>  lib/buildid.c             |  4 ++--
>  mm/gup.c                  | 14 +++-----------
>  mm/mlock.c                |  2 +-
>  mm/secretmem.c            |  6 +-----
>  6 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
> index 12a12dae727d..b52b28ae4636 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
> @@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ enum mapping_flags {
>                                    folio contents */
>         AS_INACCESSIBLE = 8,    /* Do not attempt direct R/W access to the mapping */
>         AS_WRITEBACK_MAY_DEADLOCK_ON_RECLAIM = 9,
> +       AS_NO_DIRECT_MAP = 10,  /* Folios in the mapping are not in the direct map */
>         /* Bits 16-25 are used for FOLIO_ORDER */
>         AS_FOLIO_ORDER_BITS = 5,
>         AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MIN = 16,
> @@ -346,6 +347,21 @@ static inline bool mapping_writeback_may_deadlock_on_reclaim(struct address_spac
>         return test_bit(AS_WRITEBACK_MAY_DEADLOCK_ON_RECLAIM, &mapping->flags);
>  }
>
> +static inline void mapping_set_no_direct_map(struct address_space *mapping)
> +{
> +       set_bit(AS_NO_DIRECT_MAP, &mapping->flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool mapping_no_direct_map(struct address_space *mapping)
> +{
> +       return test_bit(AS_NO_DIRECT_MAP, &mapping->flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool vma_is_no_direct_map(const struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +       return vma->vm_file && mapping_no_direct_map(vma->vm_file->f_mapping);
> +}
> +

Any reason vma is const whereas mapping in the function that it calls
(defined above it) isn't?

Cheers,
/fuad

>  static inline gfp_t mapping_gfp_mask(struct address_space * mapping)
>  {
>         return mapping->gfp_mask;
> diff --git a/include/linux/secretmem.h b/include/linux/secretmem.h
> index e918f96881f5..0ae1fb057b3d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/secretmem.h
> +++ b/include/linux/secretmem.h
> @@ -4,28 +4,10 @@
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SECRETMEM
>
> -extern const struct address_space_operations secretmem_aops;
> -
> -static inline bool secretmem_mapping(struct address_space *mapping)
> -{
> -       return mapping->a_ops == &secretmem_aops;
> -}
> -
> -bool vma_is_secretmem(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
>  bool secretmem_active(void);
>
>  #else
>
> -static inline bool vma_is_secretmem(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> -{
> -       return false;
> -}
> -
> -static inline bool secretmem_mapping(struct address_space *mapping)
> -{
> -       return false;
> -}
> -
>  static inline bool secretmem_active(void)
>  {
>         return false;
> diff --git a/lib/buildid.c b/lib/buildid.c
> index c4b0f376fb34..33f173a607ad 100644
> --- a/lib/buildid.c
> +++ b/lib/buildid.c
> @@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ static int freader_get_folio(struct freader *r, loff_t file_off)
>
>         freader_put_folio(r);
>
> -       /* reject secretmem folios created with memfd_secret() */
> -       if (secretmem_mapping(r->file->f_mapping))
> +       /* reject secretmem folios created with memfd_secret() or guest_memfd() */
> +       if (mapping_no_direct_map(r->file->f_mapping))
>                 return -EFAULT;
>
>         r->folio = filemap_get_folio(r->file->f_mapping, file_off >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index adffe663594d..8c988e076e5d 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -1234,7 +1234,7 @@ static int check_vma_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long gup_flags)
>         if ((gup_flags & FOLL_SPLIT_PMD) && is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
>                 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> -       if (vma_is_secretmem(vma))
> +       if (vma_is_no_direct_map(vma))
>                 return -EFAULT;
>
>         if (write) {
> @@ -2751,7 +2751,6 @@ static bool gup_fast_folio_allowed(struct folio *folio, unsigned int flags)
>  {
>         bool reject_file_backed = false;
>         struct address_space *mapping;
> -       bool check_secretmem = false;
>         unsigned long mapping_flags;
>
>         /*
> @@ -2763,14 +2762,6 @@ static bool gup_fast_folio_allowed(struct folio *folio, unsigned int flags)
>                 reject_file_backed = true;
>
>         /* We hold a folio reference, so we can safely access folio fields. */
> -
> -       /* secretmem folios are always order-0 folios. */
> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SECRETMEM) && !folio_test_large(folio))
> -               check_secretmem = true;
> -
> -       if (!reject_file_backed && !check_secretmem)
> -               return true;
> -
>         if (WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_test_slab(folio)))
>                 return false;
>
> @@ -2812,8 +2803,9 @@ static bool gup_fast_folio_allowed(struct folio *folio, unsigned int flags)
>          * At this point, we know the mapping is non-null and points to an
>          * address_space object.
>          */
> -       if (check_secretmem && secretmem_mapping(mapping))
> +       if (mapping_no_direct_map(mapping))
>                 return false;
> +
>         /* The only remaining allowed file system is shmem. */
>         return !reject_file_backed || shmem_mapping(mapping);
>  }
> diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
> index a1d93ad33c6d..0def453fe881 100644
> --- a/mm/mlock.c
> +++ b/mm/mlock.c
> @@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ static int mlock_fixup(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>
>         if (newflags == oldflags || (oldflags & VM_SPECIAL) ||
>             is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) || vma == get_gate_vma(current->mm) ||
> -           vma_is_dax(vma) || vma_is_secretmem(vma) || (oldflags & VM_DROPPABLE))
> +           vma_is_dax(vma) || vma_is_no_direct_map(vma) || (oldflags & VM_DROPPABLE))
>                 /* don't set VM_LOCKED or VM_LOCKONFAULT and don't count */
>                 goto out;
>
> diff --git a/mm/secretmem.c b/mm/secretmem.c
> index 422dcaa32506..a2daee0e63a5 100644
> --- a/mm/secretmem.c
> +++ b/mm/secretmem.c
> @@ -134,11 +134,6 @@ static int secretmem_mmap_prepare(struct vm_area_desc *desc)
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> -bool vma_is_secretmem(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> -{
> -       return vma->vm_ops == &secretmem_vm_ops;
> -}
> -
>  static const struct file_operations secretmem_fops = {
>         .release        = secretmem_release,
>         .mmap_prepare   = secretmem_mmap_prepare,
> @@ -206,6 +201,7 @@ static struct file *secretmem_file_create(unsigned long flags)
>
>         mapping_set_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping, GFP_HIGHUSER);
>         mapping_set_unevictable(inode->i_mapping);
> +       mapping_set_no_direct_map(inode->i_mapping);
>
>         inode->i_op = &secretmem_iops;
>         inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &secretmem_aops;
> --
> 2.50.1
>


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-28 10:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-28  9:39 [PATCH v5 00/12] Direct Map Removal Support for guest_memfd Roy, Patrick
2025-08-28  9:39 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] filemap: Pass address_space mapping to ->free_folio() Roy, Patrick
2025-08-28  9:39 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] arch: export set_direct_map_valid_noflush to KVM module Roy, Patrick
2025-08-28 10:07   ` Fuad Tabba
2025-09-01 13:47     ` Roy, Patrick
2025-08-28  9:39 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] mm: introduce AS_NO_DIRECT_MAP Roy, Patrick
2025-08-28 10:21   ` Fuad Tabba [this message]
2025-09-01 13:54     ` Roy, Patrick
2025-09-01 14:56       ` Roy, Patrick
2025-09-02  7:59         ` Fuad Tabba
2025-09-02  8:46           ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-02  8:50             ` Fuad Tabba
2025-09-02  9:18               ` Roy, Patrick
2025-09-02  9:21                 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-09-02  9:54                   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-28 14:26   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-09-01 13:56     ` Roy, Patrick
2025-08-28 21:00   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 14:03     ` Roy, Patrick
2025-08-31 10:26   ` kernel test robot
2025-09-01 14:05     ` Roy, Patrick
2025-08-28  9:39 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] KVM: guest_memfd: Add flag to remove from direct map Roy, Patrick
2025-08-28 14:54   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-09-01 14:22     ` Roy, Patrick
2025-09-01 14:27       ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-28  9:39 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] KVM: Documentation: describe GUEST_MEMFD_FLAG_NO_DIRECT_MAP Roy, Patrick
2025-08-28 10:27   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-01 14:30     ` Roy, Patrick
2025-09-01 14:43       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-28  9:39 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] KVM: selftests: load elf via bounce buffer Roy, Patrick
2025-08-28  9:39 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] KVM: selftests: set KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD in vm_mem_add() if guest_memfd != -1 Roy, Patrick
2025-08-28  9:39 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] KVM: selftests: Add guest_memfd based vm_mem_backing_src_types Roy, Patrick
2025-08-28  9:39 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] KVM: selftests: stuff vm_mem_backing_src_type into vm_shape Roy, Patrick
2025-08-28  9:39 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] KVM: selftests: cover GUEST_MEMFD_FLAG_NO_DIRECT_MAP in mem conversion tests Roy, Patrick
2025-08-28  9:39 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] KVM: selftests: cover GUEST_MEMFD_FLAG_NO_DIRECT_MAP in guest_memfd_test.c Roy, Patrick
2025-08-28 10:26   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-28  9:39 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] KVM: selftests: Test guest execution from direct map removed gmem Roy, Patrick
2025-08-28 12:50 ` [PATCH v5 00/12] Direct Map Removal Support for guest_memfd David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+EHjTxOmDJkwjSvAUr2O4yqEkyqeQ=_p3E5Uj5yQrPW7Qz_HA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=derekmn@amazon.com \
    --cc=jackabt@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=kalyazin@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=roypat@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xmarcalx@amazon.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox