From: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
To: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, chenhuacai@kernel.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, anup@brainfault.org,
paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, seanjc@google.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org,
willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
xiaoyao.li@intel.com, yilun.xu@intel.com,
chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, jarkko@kernel.org,
amoorthy@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
isaku.yamahata@intel.com, mic@digikod.net, vbabka@suse.cz,
vannapurve@google.com, mail@maciej.szmigiero.name,
david@redhat.com, michael.roth@amd.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
liam.merwick@oracle.com, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
steven.price@arm.com, quic_eberman@quicinc.com,
quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com, quic_tsoni@quicinc.com,
quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com, quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com,
quic_pderrin@quicinc.com, quic_pheragu@quicinc.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, maz@kernel.org,
will@kernel.org, qperret@google.com, keirf@google.com,
roypat@amazon.co.uk, shuah@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
jgg@nvidia.com, rientjes@google.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
fvdl@google.com, hughd@google.com, jthoughton@google.com,
peterx@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/10] KVM: guest_memfd: Handle kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put() for KVM as a module
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 13:57:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+EHjTxJE=_BjUE8z81r1JOyeiEXXt7vW7MhviS1jQXpwFOk_Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <diqzy0x9rqf4.fsf@ackerleytng-ctop.c.googlers.com>
Hi Ackerley,
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 13:49, Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com> wrote:
>
> Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> writes:
>
> > In some architectures, KVM could be defined as a module. If there is a
> > pending folio_put() while KVM is unloaded, the system could crash. By
> > having a helper check for that and call the function only if it's
> > available, we are able to handle that case more gracefully.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > This patch could be squashed with the previous one of the maintainers
> > think it would be better.
> > ---
> > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 5 +----
> > mm/swap.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> > virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c | 8 ++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > index 7788e3625f6d..3ad0719bfc4f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -2572,10 +2572,7 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_pre_fault_memory(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > #endif
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM
> > -static inline void kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put(struct folio *folio)
> > -{
> > - WARN_ONCE(1, "A placeholder that shouldn't trigger. Work in progress.");
> > -}
> > +void kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put(struct folio *folio);
> > #endif
> >
> > #endif
> > diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
> > index 241880a46358..27dfd75536c8 100644
> > --- a/mm/swap.c
> > +++ b/mm/swap.c
> > @@ -98,6 +98,24 @@ static void page_cache_release(struct folio *folio)
> > unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(lruvec, flags);
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM
> > +static void gmem_folio_put(struct folio *folio)
> > +{
> > +#if IS_MODULE(CONFIG_KVM)
> > + void (*fn)(struct folio *folio);
> > +
> > + fn = symbol_get(kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put);
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!fn))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + fn(folio);
> > + symbol_put(kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put);
> > +#else
> > + kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put(folio);
> > +#endif
> > +}
> > +#endif
>
> Sorry about the premature sending earlier!
>
> I was thinking about having a static function pointer in mm/swap.c that
> will be filled in when KVM is loaded and cleared when KVM is unloaded.
>
> One benefit I see is that it'll avoid the lookup that symbol_get() does
> on every folio_put(), but some other pinning on KVM would have to be
> done to prevent KVM from being unloaded in the middle of
> kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put() call.
>
> Do you/anyone else see pros/cons either way?
To be honest, I didn't do it that way (or even think of doing it that
way) since that's how vfio does it, e.g.,:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.14-rc6/source/virt/kvm/vfio.c#L38
Like you said, your suggestion would require something like
try_module_get()/put() to ensure that it's not unloaded. Is that
better? I don't know... Maybe someone with more experience could chime
in.
Thanks!
/fuad
> > +
> > static void free_typed_folio(struct folio *folio)
> > {
> > switch (folio_get_type(folio)) {
> > @@ -108,7 +126,7 @@ static void free_typed_folio(struct folio *folio)
> > #endif
> > #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM
> > case PGTY_guestmem:
> > - kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put(folio);
> > + gmem_folio_put(folio);
> > return;
> > #endif
> > default:
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> > index b2aa6bf24d3a..5fc414becae5 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> > @@ -13,6 +13,14 @@ struct kvm_gmem {
> > struct list_head entry;
> > };
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM
> > +void kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put(struct folio *folio)
> > +{
> > + WARN_ONCE(1, "A placeholder that shouldn't trigger. Work in progress.");
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put);
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM */
> > +
> > /**
> > * folio_file_pfn - like folio_file_page, but return a pfn.
> > * @folio: The folio which contains this index.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-13 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-12 17:58 [PATCH v6 00/10] KVM: Mapping guest_memfd backed memory at the host for software protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2025-03-12 17:58 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] mm: Consolidate freeing of typed folios on final folio_put() Fuad Tabba
2025-03-12 17:58 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] KVM: guest_memfd: Handle final folio_put() of guest_memfd pages Fuad Tabba
2025-03-12 17:58 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] KVM: guest_memfd: Handle kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put() for KVM as a module Fuad Tabba
2025-03-13 13:46 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-03-13 13:49 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-03-13 13:57 ` Fuad Tabba [this message]
2025-03-17 13:43 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-03-17 14:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-03-17 15:04 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-17 16:27 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-03-17 16:50 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-12 17:58 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] KVM: guest_memfd: Allow host to map guest_memfd() pages Fuad Tabba
2025-03-14 18:46 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-03-17 10:42 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-12 17:58 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] KVM: guest_memfd: Handle in-place shared memory as guest_memfd backed memory Fuad Tabba
2025-03-12 17:58 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] KVM: x86: Mark KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM as supporting guest_memfd shared memory Fuad Tabba
2025-03-12 17:58 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] KVM: arm64: Refactor user_mem_abort() calculation of force_pte Fuad Tabba
2025-03-12 17:58 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] KVM: arm64: Handle guest_memfd()-backed guest page faults Fuad Tabba
2025-03-12 17:58 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] KVM: arm64: Enable mapping guest_memfd in arm64 Fuad Tabba
2025-03-13 14:20 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-12 17:58 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] KVM: guest_memfd: selftests: guest_memfd mmap() test when mapping is allowed Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+EHjTxJE=_BjUE8z81r1JOyeiEXXt7vW7MhviS1jQXpwFOk_Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=tabba@google.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amoorthy@google.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=fvdl@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=keirf@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_eberman@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pderrin@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pheragu@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_tsoni@quicinc.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roypat@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox