From: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
To: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, chenhuacai@kernel.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, anup@brainfault.org,
paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, seanjc@google.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org,
willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
xiaoyao.li@intel.com, yilun.xu@intel.com,
chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, jarkko@kernel.org,
amoorthy@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
isaku.yamahata@intel.com, mic@digikod.net, vbabka@suse.cz,
vannapurve@google.com, mail@maciej.szmigiero.name,
david@redhat.com, michael.roth@amd.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
liam.merwick@oracle.com, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
steven.price@arm.com, quic_eberman@quicinc.com,
quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com, quic_tsoni@quicinc.com,
quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com, quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com,
quic_pderrin@quicinc.com, quic_pheragu@quicinc.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, maz@kernel.org,
will@kernel.org, qperret@google.com, keirf@google.com,
roypat@amazon.co.uk, shuah@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
jgg@nvidia.com, rientjes@google.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
fvdl@google.com, hughd@google.com, jthoughton@google.com,
peterx@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Handle final folio_put() of guest_memfd pages
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 14:35:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+EHjTxH7JXpCGsOXA+ve6U8LVnmvY5QB0x00qKWPkpSKAowBg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <diqz4j01t15e.fsf@ackerleytng-ctop.c.googlers.com>
Hi Ackerley,
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 at 14:23, Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com> wrote:
>
> Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> writes:
>
> > Hi Ackerley,
> >
> > On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 at 17:04, Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > Before transitioning a guest_memfd folio to unshared, thereby
> >> > disallowing access by the host and allowing the hypervisor to
> >> > transition its view of the guest page as private, we need to be
> >> > sure that the host doesn't have any references to the folio.
> >> >
> >> > This patch introduces a new type for guest_memfd folios, which
> >> > isn't activated in this series but is here as a placeholder and
> >> > to facilitate the code in the subsequent patch series. This will
> >> > be used in the future to register a callback that informs the
> >> > guest_memfd subsystem when the last reference is dropped,
> >> > therefore knowing that the host doesn't have any remaining
> >> > references.
> >> >
> >> > This patch also introduces the configuration option,
> >> > KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM, which toggles support for mapping
> >> > guest_memfd shared memory at the host.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
> >> > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> >> > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 7 +++++++
> >> > include/linux/page-flags.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >> > mm/debug.c | 1 +
> >> > mm/swap.c | 9 +++++++++
> >> > virt/kvm/Kconfig | 5 +++++
> >> > 5 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> >> > index f34f4cfaa513..7788e3625f6d 100644
> >> > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> >> > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> >> > @@ -2571,4 +2571,11 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_pre_fault_memory(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >> > struct kvm_pre_fault_memory *range);
> >> > #endif
> >> >
> >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM
> >> > +static inline void kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put(struct folio *folio)
> >> > +{
> >> > + WARN_ONCE(1, "A placeholder that shouldn't trigger. Work in progress.");
> >> > +}
> >> > +#endif
> >> > +
> >> > #endif
> >>
> >> Following up with the discussion at the guest_memfd biweekly call on the
> >> guestmem library, I think this folio_put() handler for guest_memfd could
> >> be the first function that's refactored out into (placeholder name)
> >> mm/guestmem.c.
> >>
> >> This folio_put() handler has to stay in memory even after KVM (as a
> >> module) is unloaded from memory, and so it is a good candidate for the
> >> first function in the guestmem library.
> >>
> >> Along those lines, CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM in this patch can be
> >> renamed CONFIG_GUESTMEM, and CONFIG_GUESTMEM will guard the existence of
> >> PGTY_guestmem.
> >>
> >> CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM can be introduced in the next patch of this
> >> series, which could, in Kconfig, select CONFIG_GUESTMEM.
> >>
> >> > diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> >> > index 6dc2494bd002..daeee9a38e4c 100644
> >> > --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
> >> > +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> >> > @@ -933,6 +933,7 @@ enum pagetype {
> >> > PGTY_slab = 0xf5,
> >> > PGTY_zsmalloc = 0xf6,
> >> > PGTY_unaccepted = 0xf7,
> >> > + PGTY_guestmem = 0xf8,
> >> >
> >> > PGTY_mapcount_underflow = 0xff
> >> > };
> >> > @@ -1082,6 +1083,21 @@ FOLIO_TYPE_OPS(hugetlb, hugetlb)
> >> > FOLIO_TEST_FLAG_FALSE(hugetlb)
> >> > #endif
> >> >
> >> > +/*
> >> > + * guestmem folios are used to back VM memory as managed by guest_memfd. Once
> >> > + * the last reference is put, instead of freeing these folios back to the page
> >> > + * allocator, they are returned to guest_memfd.
> >> > + *
> >> > + * For now, guestmem will only be set on these folios as long as they cannot be
> >> > + * mapped to user space ("private state"), with the plan of always setting that
> >> > + * type once typed folios can be mapped to user space cleanly.
> >> > + */
> >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM
> >> > +FOLIO_TYPE_OPS(guestmem, guestmem)
> >> > +#else
> >> > +FOLIO_TEST_FLAG_FALSE(guestmem)
> >> > +#endif
> >> > +
> >> > PAGE_TYPE_OPS(Zsmalloc, zsmalloc, zsmalloc)
> >> >
> >> > /*
> >> > diff --git a/mm/debug.c b/mm/debug.c
> >> > index 8d2acf432385..08bc42c6cba8 100644
> >> > --- a/mm/debug.c
> >> > +++ b/mm/debug.c
> >> > @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ static const char *page_type_names[] = {
> >> > DEF_PAGETYPE_NAME(table),
> >> > DEF_PAGETYPE_NAME(buddy),
> >> > DEF_PAGETYPE_NAME(unaccepted),
> >> > + DEF_PAGETYPE_NAME(guestmem),
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > static const char *page_type_name(unsigned int page_type)
> >> > diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
> >> > index 47bc1bb919cc..241880a46358 100644
> >> > --- a/mm/swap.c
> >> > +++ b/mm/swap.c
> >> > @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@
> >> > #include <linux/local_lock.h>
> >> > #include <linux/buffer_head.h>
> >> >
> >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM
> >> > +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> >> > +#endif
> >> > +
> >> > #include "internal.h"
> >> >
> >> > #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> >> > @@ -101,6 +105,11 @@ static void free_typed_folio(struct folio *folio)
> >> > case PGTY_hugetlb:
> >> > free_huge_folio(folio);
> >> > return;
> >> > +#endif
> >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM
> >> > + case PGTY_guestmem:
> >> > + kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put(folio);
> >> > + return;
> >> > #endif
> >> > default:
> >> > WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> >> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/Kconfig b/virt/kvm/Kconfig
> >> > index 54e959e7d68f..37f7734cb10f 100644
> >> > --- a/virt/kvm/Kconfig
> >> > +++ b/virt/kvm/Kconfig
> >> > @@ -124,3 +124,8 @@ config HAVE_KVM_ARCH_GMEM_PREPARE
> >> > config HAVE_KVM_ARCH_GMEM_INVALIDATE
> >> > bool
> >> > depends on KVM_PRIVATE_MEM
> >> > +
> >> > +config KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM
> >> > + select KVM_PRIVATE_MEM
> >> > + depends on !KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
> >>
> >> Enforcing that KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES is not selected should not
> >> be a strict requirement. Fuad explained in an offline chat that this is
> >> just temporary.
> >>
> >> If we have CONFIG_GUESTMEM, then this question is moot, I think
> >> CONFIG_GUESTMEM would just be independent of everything else; other
> >> configs would depend on CONFIG_GUESTMEM.
> >
> > There are two things here. First of all, the unfortunate naming
> > situation where PRIVATE could mean GUESTMEM, or private could mean not
> > shared. I plan to tackle this aspect (i.e., the naming) in a separate
> > patch series, since that will surely generate a lot of debate :)
> >
>
> Oops. By "depend on CONFIG_GUESTMEM" I meant "depend on the introduction
> of the guestmem shim". I think this is a good time to introduce the shim
> because the folio_put() callback needs to be in mm and not just in KVM,
> which is a loadable module and hence can be removed from memory.
>
> If we do introduce the shim, the config flag CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM
> will be replaced by CONFIG_GUESTMEM (or other name), and then the
> question on depending on !KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES will be moot
> since I think an mm config flag wouldn't place a constraint on a module
> config flag?
I see.
> When I wrote this, I thought that config flags are easily renamed since
> they're an interface and are user-facing, but I realized config flag
> renaming seems to be easily renamed based on this search [1].
>
> If we're going with renaming in a separate patch series, some mechanism
> should be introduced here to handle the case where
I'm not talking about renaming the contents of _this_ patch series. I
was referring to existing tems such as, CONFIG_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM, which
really enabled guestmemfd.
> 1. Kernel (and KVM module) is compiled with KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM set
> 2. KVM is unloaded
> 3. folio_put() tries to call kvm_gmem_handle_folio_put()
>
> > The other part is that, with shared memory in-place, the memory
> > attributes are an orthogonal matter. The attributes are the userpace's
> > view of what it expects the state of the memory to be, and are used to
> > multiplex whether the memory being accessed is guest_memfd or the
> > regular (i.e., most likely anonymous) memory used normally by KVM.
> >
> > This behavior however would be architecture, or even vm-type specific.
> >
>
> I agree it is orthogonal but I'm calling this out because "depends on
> !KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES" means if I set
> CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES, I can't use PGTY_guestmem since
> CONFIG_KVM_GMEM_SHARED_MEM would get unset.
I'll remove this dependence in the respin.
Thanks,
/fiad
> I was trying to test this with a KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM, setting up for
> using the ioctl to convert memory and hit this issue.
>
> > Cheers,
> > /fuad
> >
> >> > + bool
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=s%3Arename+dfn%3AKconfig+merged
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-10 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-03 17:10 [PATCH v5 0/9] KVM: Mapping guest_memfd backed memory at the host for software protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2025-03-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] mm: Consolidate freeing of typed folios on final folio_put() Fuad Tabba
2025-03-04 8:45 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-03-04 9:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Handle final folio_put() of guest_memfd pages Fuad Tabba
2025-03-07 17:04 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-03-10 10:50 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-10 14:23 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-03-10 14:35 ` Fuad Tabba [this message]
2025-03-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Allow host to map guest_memfd() pages Fuad Tabba
2025-03-04 8:58 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-03-04 9:27 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-04 9:45 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-03-04 9:52 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-06 0:01 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-03-06 8:48 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-06 17:05 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-03-06 22:46 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-03-07 8:57 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-07 1:53 ` James Houghton
2025-03-07 8:55 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] KVM: guest_memfd: Handle in-place shared memory as guest_memfd backed memory Fuad Tabba
2025-03-06 16:09 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-03-06 17:02 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] KVM: x86: Mark KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM as supporting guest_memfd shared memory Fuad Tabba
2025-03-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] KVM: arm64: Refactor user_mem_abort() calculation of force_pte Fuad Tabba
2025-03-06 10:46 ` Quentin Perret
2025-03-06 10:54 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-03-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] KVM: arm64: Handle guest_memfd()-backed guest page faults Fuad Tabba
2025-03-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] KVM: arm64: Enable mapping guest_memfd in arm64 Fuad Tabba
2025-03-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] KVM: guest_memfd: selftests: guest_memfd mmap() test when mapping is allowed Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+EHjTxH7JXpCGsOXA+ve6U8LVnmvY5QB0x00qKWPkpSKAowBg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tabba@google.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amoorthy@google.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=fvdl@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=keirf@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_eberman@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pderrin@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pheragu@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_tsoni@quicinc.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roypat@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox