From: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, chenhuacai@kernel.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, anup@brainfault.org,
paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, seanjc@google.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org,
willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
xiaoyao.li@intel.com, yilun.xu@intel.com,
chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, jarkko@kernel.org,
amoorthy@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com, isaku.yamahata@intel.com,
mic@digikod.net, vbabka@suse.cz, vannapurve@google.com,
ackerleytng@google.com, mail@maciej.szmigiero.name,
david@redhat.com, michael.roth@amd.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
liam.merwick@oracle.com, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
steven.price@arm.com, quic_eberman@quicinc.com,
quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com, quic_tsoni@quicinc.com,
quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com, quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com,
quic_pderrin@quicinc.com, quic_pheragu@quicinc.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, maz@kernel.org,
will@kernel.org, keirf@google.com, roypat@amazon.co.uk,
shuah@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, jgg@nvidia.com,
rientjes@google.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com, fvdl@google.com,
hughd@google.com, jthoughton@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] KVM: arm64: Introduce KVM_VM_TYPE_ARM_SW_PROTECTED machine type
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:17:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+EHjTweTLDzhcCoEZYP4iyuti+8TU3HbtLHh+u5ark6WDjbsA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z6t227f31unTnQQt@google.com>
Hi Quentin,
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 16:12, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Fuad,
>
> On Tuesday 11 Feb 2025 at 12:11:25 (+0000), Fuad Tabba wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> > index 117937a895da..f155d3781e08 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> > @@ -652,6 +652,12 @@ struct kvm_enable_cap {
> > #define KVM_VM_TYPE_ARM_IPA_SIZE_MASK 0xffULL
> > #define KVM_VM_TYPE_ARM_IPA_SIZE(x) \
> > ((x) & KVM_VM_TYPE_ARM_IPA_SIZE_MASK)
> > +
> > +#define KVM_VM_TYPE_ARM_SW_PROTECTED (1UL << 9)
>
> FWIW, the downstream Android code has used bit 31 since forever
> for that.
>
> Although I very much believe that upstream should not care about the
> downstream mess in general, in this particular instance bit 9 really
> isn't superior in any way, and there's a bunch of existing userspace
> code that uses bit 31 today as we speak. It is very much Android's
> problem to update these userspace programs if we do go with bit 9
> upstream, but I don't really see how that would benefit upstream
> either.
>
> So, given that there is no maintenance cost for upstream to use bit 31
> instead of 9, I'd vote for using bit 31 and ease the landing with
> existing userspace code, unless folks are really opinionated with this
> stuff :)
My thinking is that this bit does _not_ mean pKVM. It means an
experimental software VM that is similar to the x86
KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM. Hence why I didn't choose bit 31.
From Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst (for x86):
'''
Note, KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM is currently only for development and testing.
Do not use KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM for "real" VMs, and especially not in
production. The behavior and effective ABI for software-protected VMs is
unstable.
'''
which is similar to the documentation I added here.
Cheers,
/fuad
> Thanks,
> Quentin
>
> > +#define KVM_VM_TYPE_MASK (KVM_VM_TYPE_ARM_IPA_SIZE_MASK | \
> > + KVM_VM_TYPE_ARM_SW_PROTECTED)
> > +
> > /*
> > * ioctls for /dev/kvm fds:
> > */
> > --
> > 2.48.1.502.g6dc24dfdaf-goog
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-11 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-11 12:11 [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: Mapping guest_memfd backed memory at the host for software protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] mm: Consolidate freeing of typed folios on final folio_put() Fuad Tabba
2025-02-17 9:33 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-20 11:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] KVM: guest_memfd: Handle final folio_put() of guest_memfd pages Fuad Tabba
2025-02-12 18:19 ` Peter Xu
2025-02-13 8:29 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-17 9:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-17 10:12 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-17 11:21 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-17 11:21 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-20 11:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-20 11:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-20 11:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-20 11:28 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-20 11:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-20 11:38 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-20 11:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] KVM: guest_memfd: Allow host to map guest_memfd() pages Fuad Tabba
2025-02-12 5:07 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-02-12 9:21 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-12 21:23 ` Peter Xu
2025-02-13 8:24 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] KVM: guest_memfd: Add KVM capability to check if guest_memfd is shared Fuad Tabba
2025-02-20 11:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-20 11:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-20 11:39 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] KVM: guest_memfd: Handle in-place shared memory as guest_memfd backed memory Fuad Tabba
2025-02-12 0:15 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-02-12 9:23 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] KVM: x86: Mark KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM as supporting guest_memfd shared memory Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] KVM: arm64: Refactor user_mem_abort() calculation of force_pte Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] KVM: arm64: Handle guest_memfd()-backed guest page faults Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 15:57 ` Quentin Perret
2025-02-11 16:13 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 16:25 ` Quentin Perret
2025-02-11 16:34 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 16:57 ` Quentin Perret
2025-02-11 17:04 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 17:19 ` Quentin Perret
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] KVM: arm64: Introduce KVM_VM_TYPE_ARM_SW_PROTECTED machine type Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 16:12 ` Quentin Perret
2025-02-11 16:17 ` Fuad Tabba [this message]
2025-02-11 16:29 ` Quentin Perret
2025-02-11 16:32 ` Patrick Roy
2025-02-11 17:09 ` Quentin Perret
2025-02-14 11:13 ` Quentin Perret
2025-02-14 11:33 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-14 12:37 ` Patrick Roy
2025-02-14 13:11 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-02-14 13:18 ` Patrick Roy
2025-02-14 15:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] KVM: arm64: Enable mapping guest_memfd in arm64 Fuad Tabba
2025-02-11 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] KVM: guest_memfd: selftests: guest_memfd mmap() test when mapping is allowed Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+EHjTweTLDzhcCoEZYP4iyuti+8TU3HbtLHh+u5ark6WDjbsA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tabba@google.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amoorthy@google.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=fvdl@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=keirf@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_eberman@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pderrin@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pheragu@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_tsoni@quicinc.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roypat@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox