From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
To: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, bhe@redhat.com, jasonmiu@google.com,
arnd@arndb.de, coxu@redhat.com, dave@vasilevsky.ca,
ebiggers@google.com, graf@amazon.com, kees@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 04/13] kho: Verify deserialization status and fix FDT alignment access
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 10:25:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bDfrx21=Aw3pwPn4=AKGVeh0O+sB5gp8rvh0fk8C_nsdw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mafs0qztv4gw9.fsf@kernel.org>
> > This page is never freed, so adding it to zone managed pages or keeping it
> > reserved does not change anything.
>
> In practice, sure. I still don't see a good reason to _not_ initialize
> the page properly. It's not like it costs us much in terms of
> performance or code complexity.
>
> Since kho_restore_folio() makes sure the folio was _actually_ preserved
> from KHO, you have a safety check against previous kernel having a bug
> and not preserving the FDT properly. And I get that the FDT has already
> been used by this point, but at least you would have some known point to
> catch this.
The kho_alloc_preserve() API is different from kho_preserve_folio().
With kho_preserve_folio(), memory is allocated and some time later is
preserved, so there is a possibility for that memory to exist and be
used where it is not preserved, therefore it is a crucial step for
such memory to also do kho_restore_folio() before used. With
kho_alloc_preserve(), when the memory exists it is always preserved;
it is gurantee of this API. There is no reason to do
kho_restore_folio() on such memory at all. It can be released back to
the system via kho_free_restore()/kho_free_unpreserve().
Pasha
>
> [...]
>
> --
> Regards,
> Pratyush Yadav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-18 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-14 15:53 [PATCH v1 00/13] kho: simplify state machine and enable dynamic updates Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 01/13] kho: Fix misleading log message in kho_populate() Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 16:32 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-14 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 02/13] kho: Convert __kho_abort() to return void Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 16:32 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-14 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 03/13] kho: Preserve FDT folio only once during initialization Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 16:32 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-14 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 04/13] kho: Verify deserialization status and fix FDT alignment access Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 16:52 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-14 17:21 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-15 9:36 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-18 13:19 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-18 15:25 ` Pasha Tatashin [this message]
2025-11-18 17:11 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-20 10:39 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-14 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 05/13] kho: Always expose output FDT in debugfs Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 16:59 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-14 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 06/13] kho: Simplify serialization and remove __kho_abort Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 17:04 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-14 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 07/13] kho: Remove global preserved_mem_map and store state in FDT Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 17:11 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-14 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 08/13] kho: Remove abort functionality and support state refresh Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 17:18 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-14 17:23 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 17:47 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-14 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 09/13] kho: Update FDT dynamically for subtree addition/removal Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 16:15 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-14 16:42 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 17:27 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-14 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 10/13] kho: Allow kexec load before KHO finalization Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 17:30 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-14 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 11/13] kho: Allow memory preservation state updates after finalization Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 17:33 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-14 17:47 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 12/13] kho: Add Kconfig option to enable KHO by default Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 17:34 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-14 15:53 ` [PATCH v1 13/13] kho: Introduce high-level memory allocation API Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 16:15 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-14 16:40 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 17:45 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-14 17:54 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 16:17 ` [PATCH v1 00/13] kho: simplify state machine and enable dynamic updates Mike Rapoport
2025-11-14 16:46 ` Pasha Tatashin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+CK2bDfrx21=Aw3pwPn4=AKGVeh0O+sB5gp8rvh0fk8C_nsdw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=coxu@redhat.com \
--cc=dave@vasilevsky.ca \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=jasonmiu@google.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox