linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	 LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memory_hotplug: drain per-cpu pages again during memory offline
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:25:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bDON8A5AmKqPFWOytP-B29U-YAc9maQAvV-oGffaek6Yg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200904070235.GA15277@dhcp22.suse.cz>

> Another alternative would be to enable/disable static branch only from
> users who really care but this is quite tricky because how do you tell
> you need or not? It seems that alloc_contig_range would be just fine
> with a weaker semantic because it would "only" to a spurious failure.
> Memory hotplug on the other hand really needs to have a point where
> nobody interferes with the offlined memory so it could ask for a
> stronger semantic.
>
> Yet another option would be to make draining stronger and actually
> guarantee there are no in-flight pages to be freed to the pcp list.
> One way would be to tweak pcp->high and implement a strong barrier
> (IPI?) to sync with all CPUs. Quite expensive, especially when there are
> many draining requests (read cma users because hotplug doesn't really
> matter much as it happens seldom).
>
> So no nice&cheap solution I can think of...

I think start_isolate_page_range() should not be doing page draining
at all. It should isolate ranges, meaning set appropriate flags, but
draining should be performed by the users when appropriate: next to
lru_add_drain_all() calls both in CMA and hotplug.
Currently, the way start_isolate_page_range() drains pages is very
inefficient. It calls drain_all_pages() for every valid page block,
which is a slow call as it starts a thread per cpu, and waits for
those threads to finish before returning.

We could optimize by moving the drain_all_pages() calls from
set_migratetype_isolate() to start_isolate_page_range() and call it
once for every different zone, but both current users of this
interface guarantee that all pfns [start_pfn, end_pfn] are within the
same zone, and I think we should keep it this way, so again the extra
traversal is going to be overhead overhead.

This way we will have on average only a single drain per hot-remove
(instead of one per block), and also it is going to be symmetric only
in one place. Faster hot-remove and cma alloc, and no race, imo
win-win.

Pasha


  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-04 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-01 12:46 Pavel Tatashin
2020-09-01 18:37 ` David Rientjes
2020-09-02 14:01 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-02 14:10   ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-02 14:31     ` Pavel Tatashin
2020-09-02 14:49       ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-02 14:08 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-02 14:26   ` Pavel Tatashin
2020-09-02 14:55     ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-02 15:13       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-02 15:40         ` Pavel Tatashin
2020-09-02 17:51         ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-03  6:38           ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-03 18:20             ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-03 18:23               ` Pavel Tatashin
2020-09-03 18:31                 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-04  7:02                   ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-04 14:25                     ` Pavel Tatashin [this message]
2020-09-07  7:26                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-04  6:32                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-03  7:07 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-03 13:43   ` Pavel Tatashin
2020-09-03 13:50 ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+CK2bDON8A5AmKqPFWOytP-B29U-YAc9maQAvV-oGffaek6Yg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox