linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
To: rppt@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com,
	dmatlack@google.com,  pratyush@kernel.org, skhawaja@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] liveupdate: Make unregister functions return void
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 10:41:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bCcrqvMVvqfzh4Mxctwi+Z1qGX52x3mQ0vCSrLvf808-g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260327033335.696621-10-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>

On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 11:33 PM Pasha Tatashin
<pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> wrote:
>
> Change liveupdate_unregister_file_handler and liveupdate_unregister_flb
> to return void instead of an error code. This follows the design
> principle that unregistration during module unload should not fail,
> as the unload cannot be stopped at that point.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/liveupdate.h   | 14 ++++++--------
>  kernel/liveupdate/luo_file.c | 14 ++------------
>  kernel/liveupdate/luo_flb.c  | 11 +++--------
>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/liveupdate.h b/include/linux/liveupdate.h
> index 73ca84de3eae..2ae27711ac41 100644
> --- a/include/linux/liveupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/liveupdate.h
> @@ -229,12 +229,12 @@ bool liveupdate_enabled(void);
>  int liveupdate_reboot(void);
>
>  int liveupdate_register_file_handler(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh);
> -int liveupdate_unregister_file_handler(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh);
> +void liveupdate_unregister_file_handler(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh);
>
>  int liveupdate_register_flb(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh,
>                             struct liveupdate_flb *flb);
> -int liveupdate_unregister_flb(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh,
> -                             struct liveupdate_flb *flb);
> +void liveupdate_unregister_flb(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh,
> +                              struct liveupdate_flb *flb);
>
>  int liveupdate_flb_get_incoming(struct liveupdate_flb *flb, void **objp);
>  int liveupdate_flb_get_outgoing(struct liveupdate_flb *flb, void **objp);
> @@ -256,9 +256,8 @@ static inline int liveupdate_register_file_handler(struct liveupdate_file_handle
>         return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  }
>
> -static inline int liveupdate_unregister_file_handler(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh)
> +static inline void liveupdate_unregister_file_handler(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh)
>  {
> -       return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  }
>
>  static inline int liveupdate_register_flb(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh,
> @@ -267,10 +266,9 @@ static inline int liveupdate_register_flb(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh,
>         return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  }
>
> -static inline int liveupdate_unregister_flb(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh,
> -                                           struct liveupdate_flb *flb)
> +static inline void liveupdate_unregister_flb(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh,
> +                                            struct liveupdate_flb *flb)
>  {
> -       return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  }
>
>  static inline int liveupdate_flb_get_incoming(struct liveupdate_flb *flb,
> diff --git a/kernel/liveupdate/luo_file.c b/kernel/liveupdate/luo_file.c
> index dd55e5e74d69..761e8f7cfc82 100644
> --- a/kernel/liveupdate/luo_file.c
> +++ b/kernel/liveupdate/luo_file.c
> @@ -884,25 +884,15 @@ int liveupdate_register_file_handler(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh)
>   *
>   * Unregisters the file handler from the liveupdate core. This function
>   * reverses the operations of liveupdate_register_file_handler().
> - *
> - * It ensures safe removal by checking that:
> - * No FLB registered with this file handler.
> - *
> - * If the unregistration fails, the internal test state is reverted.
> - *
> - * Return: 0 Success. -EOPNOTSUPP when live update is not enabled. -EBUSY A live
> - * update is in progress, FLB is registred with this file handler.
>   */
> -int liveupdate_unregister_file_handler(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh)
> +void liveupdate_unregister_file_handler(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh)
>  {
>         if (!liveupdate_enabled())
> -               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +               return;
>
>         guard(rwsem_write)(&luo_register_rwlock);
>         luo_flb_unregister_all(fh);
>         list_del(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(fh, list));
>
>         module_put(fh->ops->owner);
> -
> -       return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/kernel/liveupdate/luo_flb.c b/kernel/liveupdate/luo_flb.c
> index f8348138de70..8f3c9c63e320 100644
> --- a/kernel/liveupdate/luo_flb.c
> +++ b/kernel/liveupdate/luo_flb.c
> @@ -492,21 +492,16 @@ int liveupdate_register_flb(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh,
>   * owner module (acquired during registration) is released.
>   *
>   * Context: It is typically called from a subsystem's module exit function.
> - * Return: 0 on success.
> - *         -EOPNOTSUPP if live update is disabled.
> - *         -ENOENT if the FLB was not found in the file handler's list.
>   */
> -int liveupdate_unregister_flb(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh,
> -                             struct liveupdate_flb *flb)
> +void liveupdate_unregister_flb(struct liveupdate_file_handler *fh,
> +                              struct liveupdate_flb *flb)
>  {
>         if (!liveupdate_enabled())
> -               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +               return;
>
>         guard(rwsem_write)(&luo_register_rwlock);
>
>         luo_flb_unregister_one(fh, flb);
> -
> -       return 0;
>  }

A question from Sashiko:
If the file handler is unregistered and freed by its owner, its dependent
FLBs might still retain a stale pointer to it. When an FLB is later
unregistered and calls liveupdate_unregister_flb() with this stale fh
pointer, could luo_flb_unregister_one() dereference the freed memory and
cause a use-after-free?

No, there is no UAF possability here.

1. FLBs do not keep pointers to file handlers.
The relationship between file handlers and FLBs is asymmetric. A
struct liveupdate_file_handler maintains a list of its dependent FLBs
in its flb_list. And, the struct liveupdate_flb only tracks the number
of handlers using it and its position in a global list. It does not
store pointers back to the file handlers.

2. Manual FLB unregistration: When a subsystem calls
liveupdate_unregister_flb, it is responsible for providing a valid fh
pointer. Since the subsystem typically owns the lifetime of the fh (a
static structure in the module), it is the caller's responsibility not
to pass a stale pointer.

3. Atomatic FLB unregistration during
liveupdate_unregister_file_handler function, explicitly calls
luo_flb_unregister_all(fh): luo_flb_unregister_all(fh) iterates
through the handler's flb_list, calls luo_flb_unregister_one for each,
which removes the luo_flb_link from the handler and frees it. This
ensures that when the handler is gone, all its associations with FLBs
are already destroyed.

Pasha


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-27 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-27  3:33 [PATCH v3 00/10] liveupdate: Fix module unloading and unregister API Pasha Tatashin
2026-03-27  3:33 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] liveupdate: Safely print untrusted strings Pasha Tatashin
2026-03-27 13:16   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-03-31  9:40     ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-31  9:50   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-31 16:35     ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-03-27  3:33 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] liveupdate: Synchronize lazy initialization of FLB private state Pasha Tatashin
2026-03-31 10:38   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-31 16:41     ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-03-31 19:22       ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-31 19:38         ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-03-27  3:33 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] liveupdate: Protect file handler list with rwsem Pasha Tatashin
2026-03-30 16:48   ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-30 19:32     ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-03-31 19:24   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-27  3:33 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] liveupdate: Protect FLB lists with luo_register_rwlock Pasha Tatashin
2026-03-31 19:33   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-27  3:33 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] liveupdate: Defer FLB module refcounting to active sessions Pasha Tatashin
2026-03-30 16:56   ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-30 19:28     ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-04-02 16:21   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-27  3:33 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] liveupdate: Remove luo_session_quiesce() Pasha Tatashin
2026-04-02 16:27   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-27  3:33 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] liveupdate: Auto unregister FLBs on file handler unregistration Pasha Tatashin
2026-04-03 10:17   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-27  3:33 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] liveupdate: Remove liveupdate_test_unregister() Pasha Tatashin
2026-04-03 10:20   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-27  3:33 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] liveupdate: Make unregister functions return void Pasha Tatashin
2026-03-27 14:41   ` Pasha Tatashin [this message]
2026-04-03 10:41   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-27  3:33 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] liveupdate: Defer file handler module refcounting to active sessions Pasha Tatashin
2026-03-27 17:14   ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-03 10:42   ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-27 17:24 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] liveupdate: Fix module unloading and unregister API Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+CK2bCcrqvMVvqfzh4Mxctwi+Z1qGX52x3mQ0vCSrLvf808-g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhawaja@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox