From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, surenb@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
souravpanda@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmstat: don't auto expand the sysfs files
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 12:26:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bBxbvO-osm5XKk4VkaXYgfZXkDAtfayaYJ-vXo=QFqGPA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b1049bfa-68c4-e237-30a9-1514a378c7f1@google.com>
On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 4:26 PM David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2023, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
>
> > > > Whenever a new fields are added one of the following: node_stat_item
> > > > numa_stat_item zone_stat_item, the /sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/vmstat
> > > > files are auto expanded.
> > > >
> > > > This is a problem, as sysfs files should be only one value per file.
> > >
> > > Does this patch address the one-value-per-file issue? (I think that ship
> > > has sailed for vmstat.)
> >
> > That ship has sailed for vmstat, this patch addresses what was asked
> > by GregKH: not to add new values to vmstat, as not to make the
> > existing problem even worse. The sysfs file system has a one page
> > limit per file. The developers will decide how to export the new items
> > added to node_stat, numa_stat, zone_stat individually. Each new item
> > can be exported in its own files, and must have its own documentation
> > about interface stability, value meaning, and expectations when the
> > stat file is absent.
> >
>
> As of at least 6.5, /proc/vmstat is a strict superset of the per-node
> vmstat. Why is that a problem?
The intent of this series is to stop auto expanding
/sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/vmstat as sysfs should only be one
value per file, and the task is not to make things worse. /proc/vmstat
is mostly ok, however we might not need to auto expand it as well, to
avoid situations where removing a field becomes a problem, and we have
to keep it in the file forever, like what we do with nr_unstable.
> There's great benefit to being able to use the sample implementations to
> parse either /proc/vmstat *or* the per-node vmstat and without needing to
> read the per-node vmstat plus some new set of sysfs files that are
> one-value-per-file. The per-node vmstat will always be multiple values,
> in fact it's a key value pair.
Yes, but that file is already large, and soon can overflow a page
size, instead of converting it to a binary format, let's add new items
as one item per-file.
> I have to think that doing anything else for vmstat is just adding
> complexity (like this patch) and actually making it *harder* on userspace
> to read the data it needs.
>
> Yes, the per-node vmstat likely shouldn't be in sysfs at all but it
> appears to have been added there 13+ years ago because it was a convenient
> place to add a per-node variant. That's not ideal, but owell.
It is up-to GregKH who requested this change. Greg, specifically
requested not to add new fields into per-node vmstat, and we are
adding new fields with per-page metadata series, and IOMMU accounting
series as these files are auto-expanded without this series.
Pasha
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-26 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-11 15:46 Pasha Tatashin
2023-12-11 17:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-12-11 17:09 ` Pasha Tatashin
2023-12-14 17:52 ` David Rientjes
2023-12-14 18:57 ` Pasha Tatashin
2023-12-24 21:26 ` David Rientjes
2023-12-26 17:26 ` Pasha Tatashin [this message]
2023-12-27 0:53 ` Sysfs one-value-per-file (was Re: [PATCH] vmstat: don't auto expand the sysfs files) David Rientjes
2023-12-27 18:42 ` Andrew Morton
2023-12-28 14:48 ` Pasha Tatashin
2023-12-28 20:43 ` David Rientjes
2023-12-28 20:50 ` Pasha Tatashin
2023-12-28 10:17 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-12-28 20:52 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+CK2bBxbvO-osm5XKk4VkaXYgfZXkDAtfayaYJ-vXo=QFqGPA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=souravpanda@google.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox