linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	 linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_table_check: fix accessing unmapped ptep
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 09:17:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bARAVPq6N_V-Wjfzgu9eHPw4eX8DPm2xn6sjbZF14_0Ng@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220526113350.30806-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com>

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 7:33 AM Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> ptep is unmapped too early, so ptep will be accessed while it's unmapped.
> Fix it by deferring pte_unmap() until page table checking is done.

I would re-word this as a cleanup. While pte_unmap() is currently
unused, it is still better to call it after we are done with *ptep in
case of future changes in other architectures.

>
> Fixes: 80110bbfbba6 ("mm/page_table_check: check entries at pmd levels")

This is more a clean-up, there is no existing bug, so no need to
backport to stable. Please remove the above.

> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>

With the above changes:
Acked-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>


> ---
>  mm/page_table_check.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_table_check.c b/mm/page_table_check.c
> index 3692bea2ea2c..971c3129b0e3 100644
> --- a/mm/page_table_check.c
> +++ b/mm/page_table_check.c
> @@ -234,11 +234,11 @@ void __page_table_check_pte_clear_range(struct mm_struct *mm,
>                 pte_t *ptep = pte_offset_map(&pmd, addr);
>                 unsigned long i;
>
> -               pte_unmap(ptep);
>                 for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; i++) {
>                         __page_table_check_pte_clear(mm, addr, *ptep);
>                         addr += PAGE_SIZE;
>                         ptep++;
>                 }
> +               pte_unmap(ptep);
>         }
>  }
> --
> 2.23.0
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-26 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-26 11:33 Miaohe Lin
2022-05-26 13:04 ` Qi Zheng
2022-05-26 13:11   ` Pasha Tatashin
2022-05-26 13:23     ` Qi Zheng
2022-05-26 13:17 ` Pasha Tatashin [this message]
2022-05-26 13:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-05-26 13:37   ` Pasha Tatashin
2022-05-26 18:15     ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-26 18:31       ` Pasha Tatashin
2022-05-27  1:10         ` Miaohe Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+CK2bARAVPq6N_V-Wjfzgu9eHPw4eX8DPm2xn6sjbZF14_0Ng@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox