From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f69.google.com (mail-it0-f69.google.com [209.85.214.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1646B0069 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 17:15:10 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-it0-f69.google.com with SMTP id h200so11142015itb.3 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 14:15:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-sor-f41.google.com (mail-sor-f41.google.com. [209.85.220.41]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id o73sor3242454ito.129.2017.12.14.14.15.09 for (Google Transport Security); Thu, 14 Dec 2017 14:15:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20171214112726.742649793@infradead.org> <20171214113851.647809433@infradead.org> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 14:15:08 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/17] selftests/x86/ldt_gdt: Prepare for access bit forced Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Thomas Gleixner , X86 ML , Dave Hansen , Borislav Petkov , Greg KH , Kees Cook , Hugh Dickins , Brian Gerst , Josh Poimboeuf , Denys Vlasenko , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , David Laight , Eduardo Valentin , "Liguori, Anthony" , Will Deacon , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Dan Williams On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > That seems to rather defeat the point of using a VMA, though. There never was any point in using a VMA per se. The point was always to just map the damn thing in the user page tables, wasn't it? The vma bit was just an implementation detail. Linus -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org