From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com (mail-io0-f176.google.com [209.85.223.176]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7C56B0253 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:59:37 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-io0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 77so7422429ioc.2 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:59:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160115202131.GH6330@kvack.org> References: <80934665e0dd2360e2583522c7c7569e5a92be0e.1452549431.git.bcrl@kvack.org> <20160112011128.GC6033@dastard> <20160112022548.GD6033@dastard> <20160112033708.GE6033@dastard> <20160115202131.GH6330@kvack.org> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:59:35 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] aio: enabled thread based async fsync From: Linus Torvalds Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Benjamin LaHaise Cc: Dave Chinner , linux-aio@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux API , linux-mm , Alexander Viro , Andrew Morton On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: >> >> I'll have to think about this some more. > > Any further thoughts on this after a few days worth of pondering? Sorry about the delay, with the merge window and me being sick for a couple of days I didn't get around to this. After thinking it over some more, I guess I'm ok with your approach. The table-driven patch makes me a bit happier, and I guess not very many people end up ever wanting to do async system calls anyway. Are there other users outside of Solace? It would be good to get comments.. Linus -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org