From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com,
davem@davemloft.net, mingo@elte.hu, ebiederm@xmission.com,
aarcange@redhat.com, ericvh@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
josh@joshtriplett.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, axboe@kernel.dk, agk@redhat.com,
dm-devel@redhat.com, neilb@suse.de, ccaulfie@redhat.com,
teigland@redhat.com, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com,
bfields@fieldses.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, jesse@nicira.com,
venkat.x.venkatsubra@oracle.com, ejt@redhat.com,
snitzer@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org,
rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, lw@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:25:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzFMrOUwdHHJ5-YUtEzTHGvdRosQc+K+trjub0K-w-D3A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1351646186.4004.41.camel@gandalf.local.home>
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> ({ \
> sizeof(val) <= 4 ? hash_32(val, bits) : hash_long(val, bits); \
> })
>
> Is the better way to go. We are C programmers, we like to see the ?: on
> a single line if possible. The way you have it, looks like three
> statements run consecutively.
If we're C programmers, why use the non-standard statement-expression
at all? And split it onto three lines when it's just a single one?
But whatever. This series has gotten way too much bike-shedding
anyway. I think it should just be applied, since it does remove lines
of code overall. I'd even possibly apply it to mainline, but it seems
to be against linux-next.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-31 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-30 18:45 Sasha Levin
2012-10-30 18:45 ` [PATCH v8 02/16] userns: use new hashtable implementation Sasha Levin
2012-10-30 18:45 ` [PATCH v8 03/16] mm,ksm: " Sasha Levin
2012-10-30 18:46 ` [PATCH v8 04/16] workqueue: " Sasha Levin
2012-10-30 18:46 ` [PATCH v8 05/16] mm/huge_memory: " Sasha Levin
2012-10-30 18:46 ` [PATCH v8 06/16] tracepoint: " Sasha Levin
2012-10-30 19:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-10-30 18:46 ` [PATCH v8 07/16] net,9p: " Sasha Levin
2012-10-30 18:46 ` [PATCH v8 08/16] block,elevator: " Sasha Levin
2012-10-30 18:46 ` [PATCH v8 09/16] SUNRPC/cache: " Sasha Levin
2012-10-30 18:46 ` [PATCH v8 10/16] dlm: " Sasha Levin
2012-10-30 18:46 ` [PATCH v8 11/16] net,l2tp: " Sasha Levin
2012-10-30 18:46 ` [PATCH v8 12/16] dm: " Sasha Levin
2012-10-30 18:46 ` [PATCH v8 13/16] lockd: " Sasha Levin
2012-10-30 18:46 ` [PATCH v8 14/16] net,rds: " Sasha Levin
2012-10-30 18:46 ` [PATCH v8 15/16] openvswitch: " Sasha Levin
2012-10-30 18:46 ` [PATCH v8 16/16] tracing output: " Sasha Levin
2012-10-30 19:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-10-30 19:19 ` [PATCH v8 01/16] hashtable: introduce a small and naive hashtable Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-10-30 21:42 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-31 0:33 ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-31 0:51 ` Jim Rees
2012-10-31 1:15 ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-31 1:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-10-31 1:25 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2012-10-31 1:36 ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-31 2:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-11-02 4:23 ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-31 1:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-10-31 2:24 ` Al Viro
2012-10-31 2:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-10-31 3:24 ` Al Viro
2012-10-31 3:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-10-31 9:46 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+55aFzFMrOUwdHHJ5-YUtEzTHGvdRosQc+K+trjub0K-w-D3A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=ccaulfie@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ejt@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jesse@nicira.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lw@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=rds-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=teigland@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=venkat.x.venkatsubra@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox