From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qe0-f54.google.com (mail-qe0-f54.google.com [209.85.128.54]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87AF76B0035 for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 13:34:27 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qe0-f54.google.com with SMTP id cy11so3176417qeb.41 for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:34:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vc0-x236.google.com (mail-vc0-x236.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c03::236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t7si9618962qar.27.2013.12.15.10.34.26 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:34:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id lc6so2567257vcb.41 for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:34:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20131215155539.GM11295@suse.de> References: <1386964870-6690-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <20131215155539.GM11295@suse.de> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:34:25 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix ebizzy performance regression due to X86 TLB range flush v2 From: Linus Torvalds Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Mel Gorman Cc: Alex Shi , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Fengguang Wu , H Peter Anvin , Linux-X86 , Linux-MM , LKML On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Mel Gorman wrote: > > Short answer -- There appears to be a second bug where 3.13-rc3 is less > fair to threads getting time on the CPU. Hmm. Can you point me at the (fixed) microbenchmark you mention? Linus -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org