linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
	bhutchings@solarflare.com,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch for-3.7 v2] mm, mempolicy: avoid taking mutex inside spinlock when reading numa_maps
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 21:14:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFy9uYifEQ20-tQXvFCYSqb2VG74XhM6ZofHJW_VuqWdZQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <507F803A.8000900@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Kamezawa Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>         if (vma && vma != priv->tail_vma) {
>                 struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +               task_lock(priv->task);
> +               __mpol_put(priv->task->mempolicy);
> +               task_unlock(priv->task);
> +#endif
>                 up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>                 mmput(mm);

Please don't put #ifdef's inside code. It makes things really ugly and
hard to read.

And that is *especially* true in this case, since there's a pattern to
all these things:

> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +       task_lock(priv->task);
> +       mpol_get(priv->task->mempolicy);
> +       task_unlock(priv->task);
> +#endif

> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +       task_lock(priv->task);
> +       __mpol_put(priv->task->mempolicy);
> +       task_unlock(priv->task);
> +#endif

it really sounds like what you want to do is to just abstract a
"numa_policy_get/put(priv)" operation.

So you could make it be something like

  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
  static inline numa_policy_get(struct proc_maps_private *priv)
  {
      task_lock(priv->task);
      mpol_get(priv->task->mempolicy);
      task_unlock(priv->task);
  }
  .. same for the "put" function ..
  #else
    #define numa_policy_get(priv) do { } while (0)
    #define numa_policy_put(priv) do { } while (0)
  #endif

and then you wouldn't have to have the #ifdef's in the middle of code,
and I think it will be more readable in general.

Sure, it is going to be a few more actual lines of patch, but there's
no duplicated code sequence, and the added lines are just the syntax
that makes it look better.

                Linus

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-18  4:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-08 15:09 mpol_to_str revisited Dave Jones
2012-10-08 15:15 ` Dave Jones
2012-10-08 20:46   ` David Rientjes
2012-10-08 20:35 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-08 20:52   ` Dave Jones
2012-10-16  0:48     ` David Rientjes
2012-10-09  0:33 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-10-16  2:34 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-16  3:58   ` David Rientjes
2012-10-16  5:10     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-16  6:10       ` David Rientjes
2012-10-16 23:39         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17  0:12           ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17  0:31             ` [patch for-3.7] mm, mempolicy: fix printing stack contents in numa_maps David Rientjes
2012-10-17  1:38               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17  1:49                 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17  1:53                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17  4:05               ` Dave Jones
2012-10-17  5:24                 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17  5:42                   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-17  8:49                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17 19:50                       ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17 21:05                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17 21:27                           ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17 18:14                   ` Dave Jones
2012-10-17 19:21                     ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17 19:32                       ` Dave Jones
2012-10-17 19:38                         ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17 19:45                           ` Dave Jones
2012-10-17 20:28                             ` [patch for-3.7] mm, mempolicy: avoid taking mutex inside spinlock when reading numa_maps David Rientjes
2012-10-17 21:31                               ` [patch for-3.7 v2] " David Rientjes
2012-10-18  4:06                                 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-18  4:14                                   ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2012-10-18  4:41                                     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-18  4:34                                   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-18 20:03                                     ` David Rientjes
2012-10-19  8:35                                       ` [patch for-3.7 v3] mm, mempolicy: hold task->mempolicy refcount while " Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-19  9:28                                         ` David Rientjes
2012-10-22  2:47                                           ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-22 20:55                                             ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-22 20:56                                             ` David Rientjes
2012-10-19 19:15                                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-19  6:51                                     ` [patch for-3.7 v2] mm, mempolicy: avoid taking mutex inside spinlock when " KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-18  4:35                                   ` David Rientjes
2012-10-24 23:30                   ` [patch for-3.7] mm, mempolicy: fix printing stack contents in numa_maps Sasha Levin
2012-10-24 23:34                     ` David Rientjes
2012-10-24 23:37                       ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-25  0:08                         ` David Rientjes
2012-10-25  0:54                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-25  1:15                             ` David Rientjes
2012-10-25 12:19                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-25 14:39                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-25 17:23                               ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-25 20:22                               ` David Rientjes
2012-10-25 23:09                               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-10-26  8:48                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-31 18:29                                   ` Sasha Levin
2012-11-21  0:59                                     ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-17  1:33             ` mpol_to_str revisited KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+55aFy9uYifEQ20-tQXvFCYSqb2VG74XhM6ZofHJW_VuqWdZQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox