From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f200.google.com (mail-io0-f200.google.com [209.85.223.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4F76B0433 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:23:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-io0-f200.google.com with SMTP id 84so92512iop.15 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:23:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-it0-x236.google.com (mail-it0-x236.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r22si13109761itr.51.2017.06.21.11.23.53 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-it0-x236.google.com with SMTP id m62so37702909itc.0 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:23:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Linus Torvalds Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:23:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] PCID and improved laziness Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Borislav Petkov , Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Nadav Amit , Rik van Riel , Dave Hansen , Arjan van de Ven , Peter Zijlstra On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > There are three performance benefits here: Side note: can you post the actual performance numbers, even if only from some silly test program on just one platform? Things like lmbench pipe benchmark or something? Or maybe you did, and I just missed it. But when talking about performance, I'd really like to always see some actual numbers. Linus -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org