From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx102.postini.com [74.125.245.102]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BCF7B6B0068 for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 09:56:32 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u3so1605385wey.14 for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 06:56:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20121117145015.GF16441@x1.osrc.amd.com> References: <508A8D31.9000106@redhat.com> <20121026132601.GC9886@gmail.com> <20121026144502.6e94643e@dull> <20121026221254.7d32c8bf@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> <508BE459.2080406@redhat.com> <20121029165705.GA4693@x1.osrc.amd.com> <20121117145015.GF16441@x1.osrc.amd.com> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 06:56:10 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86,mm: drop TLB flush from ptep_set_access_flags Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Borislav Petkov , Linus Torvalds , Rik van Riel , Alan Cox , Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen , Michel Lespinasse , Peter Zijlstra , Andrea Arcangeli , Mel Gorman , Johannes Weiner , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm , Florian Fainelli , Borislav Petkov On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > Albeit with a slight delay, the answer is yes: all AMD cpus > automatically invalidate cached TLB entries (and intermediate walk > results, for that matter) on a #PF. Thanks. I suspect it ends up being basically architectural, and that Windows (and quite possibly Linux versions too) have depended on the behavior. > I don't know, however, whether it would be prudent to have some sort of > a cheap assertion in the code (cheaper than INVLPG %ADDR, although on > older cpus we do MOV CR3) just in case. This should be enabled only with > DEBUG_VM on, of course... I wonder how we could actually test for it. We'd have to have some per-cpu page-fault address check (along with a generation count on the mm or similar). I doubt we'd figure out anything that works reliably and efficiently and would actually show any problems (plus we would have no way to ever know we even got the code right, since presumably we'd never find hardware that actually shows the behavior we'd be looking for..) Linus -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org