From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f71.google.com (mail-oi0-f71.google.com [209.85.218.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC6A28026C for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 18:24:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oi0-f71.google.com with SMTP id i193so474820644oib.3 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 15:24:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-oi0-x243.google.com (mail-oi0-x243.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4003:c06::243]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w26si1568916otd.250.2016.09.25.15.24.47 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 25 Sep 2016 15:24:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi0-x243.google.com with SMTP id n202so12519505oig.2 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 15:24:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20160911225425.10388-1-lstoakes@gmail.com> <20160925184731.GA20480@lucifer> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 15:24:47 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: check VMA flags to avoid invalid PROT_NONE NUMA balancing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: linux-mm , Mel Gorman , Rik van Riel , tbsaunde@tbsaunde.org, robert@ocallahan.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Can I have an ACK from the involved people, and I'll apply it > directly.. Mel? Rik? Oh well. The patch looks fine to me and I want to include it in the rc8 release, so I'll apply it. Worst comes to worst we can revert, but I can confirm that it's trivial to trigger the BUG_ON() without the patch, so.. Linus -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org