linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Cedric Blancher <cedric.blancher@gmail.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.com>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] radix-tree: Fix optimisation problem
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 12:04:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxOJTOvxhv+hECHuGV+=xBHMuQitu86J=qBNmMYQ1ACSg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzge97L-JLKZq0CTW1wtMOsnt8QzOw3b5qCMmzbKxZ5aw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 811 bytes --]

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> The more I look at that particular piece of code, the less I like it. It's
> buggy shit. It needs to be rewritten entirely too actually check for sibling
> entries, not that ad-hoc arithmetic crap.

Here's my attempt at cleaning the mess up.

I'm not claiming it's perfect, but I think it's better. It gets rid of
the ad-hoc arithmetic in radix_tree_descend(), and just makes all that
be inside the is_sibling_entry() logic instead. Which got renamed and
made to actually return the main sibling. So now there is at least
only *one* piece of code that does that range comparison, and I don't
think there is any huge need to explain what's going on, because the
"magic" is unconditional.

Willy?

                 Linus

[-- Attachment #2: patch.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1766 bytes --]

 lib/radix-tree.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/radix-tree.c b/lib/radix-tree.c
index 1b7bf7314141..210709b07759 100644
--- a/lib/radix-tree.c
+++ b/lib/radix-tree.c
@@ -78,18 +78,20 @@ static inline void *node_to_entry(void *ptr)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RADIX_TREE_MULTIORDER
 /* Sibling slots point directly to another slot in the same node */
-static inline bool is_sibling_entry(struct radix_tree_node *parent, void *node)
+static inline void **get_sibling_entry(struct radix_tree_node *parent, void *node)
 {
-	void **ptr = node;
-	return (parent->slots <= ptr) &&
-			(ptr < parent->slots + RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE);
+	void **ptr = (void **) entry_to_node(node);
+	if ((parent->slots <= ptr) && (ptr < parent->slots + RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE))
+		return ptr;
+	return NULL;
 }
 #else
-static inline bool is_sibling_entry(struct radix_tree_node *parent, void *node)
+static inline void **get_sibling_entry(struct radix_tree_node *parent, void *node)
 {
-	return false;
+	return NULL;
 }
 #endif
+#define is_sibling_entry(parent, node) (get_sibling_entry(parent,node) != NULL)
 
 static inline unsigned long get_slot_offset(struct radix_tree_node *parent,
 						 void **slot)
@@ -105,10 +107,10 @@ static unsigned int radix_tree_descend(struct radix_tree_node *parent,
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RADIX_TREE_MULTIORDER
 	if (radix_tree_is_internal_node(entry)) {
-		unsigned long siboff = get_slot_offset(parent, entry);
-		if (siboff < RADIX_TREE_MAP_SIZE) {
-			offset = siboff;
-			entry = rcu_dereference_raw(parent->slots[offset]);
+		void **sibentry = get_sibling_entry(parent, entry);
+		if (sibentry) {
+			offset = get_slot_offset(parent, sibentry);
+			entry = rcu_dereference_raw(*sibentry);
 		}
 	}
 #endif

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-25 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-22 18:53 [PATCH 0/2] Fix radix_tree_lookup_slot() Matthew Wilcox
2016-09-22 18:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] radix tree test suite: Test radix_tree_replace_slot() for multiorder entries Matthew Wilcox
2016-09-22 18:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] radix-tree: Fix optimisation problem Matthew Wilcox
2016-09-22 18:09   ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-23 20:16     ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-09-24 20:21       ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-24 20:47         ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-24 21:04         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-09-24 22:54           ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-26  4:26             ` Ross Zwisler
2016-09-24  8:36   ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2016-09-24 23:35   ` Cedric Blancher
2016-09-25  0:18     ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-25 17:59       ` Cedric Blancher
2016-09-25 18:04         ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-25 19:04           ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2016-09-25 19:40             ` Cedric Blancher
2016-09-25 19:56             ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-26 21:28               ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-09-26 21:48                 ` Cedric Blancher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+55aFxOJTOvxhv+hECHuGV+=xBHMuQitu86J=qBNmMYQ1ACSg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cedric.blancher@gmail.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=koct9i@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mawilcox@linuxonhyperv.com \
    --cc=mawilcox@microsoft.com \
    --cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox