From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f72.google.com (mail-oi0-f72.google.com [209.85.218.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3F76B0275 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 18:09:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oi0-f72.google.com with SMTP id n202so18996811oig.3 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:09:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-oi0-x22a.google.com (mail-oi0-x22a.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f27si2785922otd.81.2016.10.26.15.09.42 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:09:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id y2so14790549oie.0 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:09:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161026220339.GE2699@techsingularity.net> References: <20161026203158.GD2699@techsingularity.net> <20161026220339.GE2699@techsingularity.net> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:09:41 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CONFIG_VMAP_STACK, on-stack struct, and wake_up_bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Mel Gorman Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Andreas Gruenbacher , Peter Zijlstra , Andy Lutomirski , LKML , Bob Peterson , Steven Whitehouse , linux-mm On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > > To be clear, are you referring to PeterZ's patch that avoids the lookup? If > so, I see your point. Yup, that's the one. I think you tested it. In fact, I'm sure you did, because I remember seeing performance numbers from you ;) So yes, I'd expect my patch on its own to quite possibly regress on NUMA systems (although I wonder how much), but I consider PeterZ's patch the fix to that, so I wouldn't worry about it. Linus -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org