From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f200.google.com (mail-io0-f200.google.com [209.85.223.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15E06B267C for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 17:37:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-io0-f200.google.com with SMTP id n17-v6so2650463ioa.5 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 14:37:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-sor-f65.google.com (mail-sor-f65.google.com. [209.85.220.65]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id w66-v6sor976840itd.125.2018.08.22.14.37.17 for (Google Transport Security); Wed, 22 Aug 2018 14:37:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180822153012.173508681@infradead.org> <20180822154046.717610121@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20180822154046.717610121@infradead.org> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 14:37:05 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/mm/tlb: Revert the recent lazy TLB patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Andrew Lutomirski , the arch/x86 maintainers , Borislav Petkov , Will Deacon , Rik van Riel , Jann Horn , Adin Scannell , Dave Hansen , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 8:46 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Revert [..] in order to simplify the TLB invalidate fixes for x86. We'll try again later. Rik, I assume I should take your earlier "yeah, I can try later" as an ack for this? I'll wait a bit more in the hopes of getting reviews/acks, but I'm basically chomping at the bit to just apply this series and have this issue behind us. Linus