linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>,
	Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
	Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
	Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>, Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH hotfix v2 1/2] mm/thp: fix deferred split queue not partially_mapped
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 16:06:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C4ECCA8C-FBF6-41AA-9877-4376EC94E021@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81e34a8b-113a-0701-740e-2135c97eb1d7@google.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1879 bytes --]

On 27 Oct 2024, at 15:59, Hugh Dickins wrote:

> Recent changes are putting more pressure on THP deferred split queues:
> under load revealing long-standing races, causing list_del corruptions,
> "Bad page state"s and worse (I keep BUGs in both of those, so usually
> don't get to see how badly they end up without).  The relevant recent
> changes being 6.8's mTHP, 6.10's mTHP swapout, and 6.12's mTHP swapin,
> improved swap allocation, and underused THP splitting.
>
> The new unlocked list_del_init() in deferred_split_scan() is buggy.
> I gave bad advice, it looks plausible since that's a local on-stack
> list, but the fact is that it can race with a third party freeing or
> migrating the preceding folio (properly unqueueing it with refcount 0
> while holding split_queue_lock), thereby corrupting the list linkage.
>
> The obvious answer would be to take split_queue_lock there: but it has
> a long history of contention, so I'm reluctant to add to that. Instead,
> make sure that there is always one safe (raised refcount) folio before,
> by delaying its folio_put().  (And of course I was wrong to suggest
> updating split_queue_len without the lock: leave that until the splice.)
>
> And remove two over-eager partially_mapped checks, restoring those tests
> to how they were before: if uncharge_folio() or free_tail_page_prepare()
> finds _deferred_list non-empty, it's in trouble whether or not that folio
> is partially_mapped (and the flag was already cleared in the latter case).
>
> Fixes: dafff3f4c850 ("mm: split underused THPs")
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> Acked-by: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> Based on 6.12-rc4
> v2: added ack and reviewed-bys

Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>

--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 854 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-27 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-27 19:59 Hugh Dickins
2024-10-27 20:02 ` [PATCH hotfix v2 2/2] mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking Hugh Dickins
2024-10-28 10:43   ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-28 17:19     ` Hugh Dickins
2024-10-28 17:26       ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-28 18:39   ` Yang Shi
2024-10-27 20:06 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2024-11-10 21:08   ` [PATCH hotfix v2 1/2] mm/thp: fix deferred split queue not partially_mapped Hugh Dickins
2024-11-10 21:11     ` [PATCH hotfix] mm/thp: fix deferred split queue not partially_mapped: fix Hugh Dickins
2024-11-10 21:22       ` Usama Arif
2024-11-11  3:10       ` Zi Yan
2024-11-12  1:36       ` Baolin Wang
2024-11-13 22:57       ` Chris Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=C4ECCA8C-FBF6-41AA-9877-4376EC94E021@nvidia.com \
    --to=ziy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox