From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>, Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH hotfix v2 1/2] mm/thp: fix deferred split queue not partially_mapped
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 16:06:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C4ECCA8C-FBF6-41AA-9877-4376EC94E021@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81e34a8b-113a-0701-740e-2135c97eb1d7@google.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1879 bytes --]
On 27 Oct 2024, at 15:59, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Recent changes are putting more pressure on THP deferred split queues:
> under load revealing long-standing races, causing list_del corruptions,
> "Bad page state"s and worse (I keep BUGs in both of those, so usually
> don't get to see how badly they end up without). The relevant recent
> changes being 6.8's mTHP, 6.10's mTHP swapout, and 6.12's mTHP swapin,
> improved swap allocation, and underused THP splitting.
>
> The new unlocked list_del_init() in deferred_split_scan() is buggy.
> I gave bad advice, it looks plausible since that's a local on-stack
> list, but the fact is that it can race with a third party freeing or
> migrating the preceding folio (properly unqueueing it with refcount 0
> while holding split_queue_lock), thereby corrupting the list linkage.
>
> The obvious answer would be to take split_queue_lock there: but it has
> a long history of contention, so I'm reluctant to add to that. Instead,
> make sure that there is always one safe (raised refcount) folio before,
> by delaying its folio_put(). (And of course I was wrong to suggest
> updating split_queue_len without the lock: leave that until the splice.)
>
> And remove two over-eager partially_mapped checks, restoring those tests
> to how they were before: if uncharge_folio() or free_tail_page_prepare()
> finds _deferred_list non-empty, it's in trouble whether or not that folio
> is partially_mapped (and the flag was already cleared in the latter case).
>
> Fixes: dafff3f4c850 ("mm: split underused THPs")
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> Acked-by: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> Based on 6.12-rc4
> v2: added ack and reviewed-bys
Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 854 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-27 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-27 19:59 Hugh Dickins
2024-10-27 20:02 ` [PATCH hotfix v2 2/2] mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking Hugh Dickins
2024-10-28 10:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-28 17:19 ` Hugh Dickins
2024-10-28 17:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-10-28 18:39 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-27 20:06 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2024-11-10 21:08 ` [PATCH hotfix v2 1/2] mm/thp: fix deferred split queue not partially_mapped Hugh Dickins
2024-11-10 21:11 ` [PATCH hotfix] mm/thp: fix deferred split queue not partially_mapped: fix Hugh Dickins
2024-11-10 21:22 ` Usama Arif
2024-11-11 3:10 ` Zi Yan
2024-11-12 1:36 ` Baolin Wang
2024-11-13 22:57 ` Chris Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C4ECCA8C-FBF6-41AA-9877-4376EC94E021@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox