From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
To: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Geetika Moolchandani <geetika@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] selftests: mm: hugepage-vmemmap fails on 64K page size systems.
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:07:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C3CE35A3-7663-4B8E-9E85-8F0C3CD7D9EC@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240110075351.f4b6f43e31629ddcb96503cc@linux-foundation.org>
> On Jan 10, 2024, at 23:53, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> (cc Muchun)
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:03:35 +0530 Donet Tom <donettom@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> The kernel sefltest mm/hugepage-vmemmap fails on architectures
>> which has different page size other than 4K. In hugepage-vmemmap
>> page size used is 4k so the pfn calculation will go wrong on systems
>> which has different page size .The length of MAP_HUGETLB memory must
>> be hugepage aligned but in hugepage-vmemmap map length is 2M so this
>> will not get aligned if the system has differnet hugepage size.
>>
>> Added psize() to get the page size and default_huge_page_size() to
>> get the default hugepage size at run time, hugepage-vmemmap test pass
>> on powerpc with 64K page size and x86 with 4K page size.
>>
>> Result on powerpc without patch (page size 64K)
>> *# ./hugepage-vmemmap
>> Returned address is 0x7effff000000 whose pfn is 0
>> Head page flags (100000000) is invalid
>> check_page_flags: Invalid argument
>> *#
>>
>> Result on powerpc with patch (page size 64K)
>> *# ./hugepage-vmemmap
>> Returned address is 0x7effff000000 whose pfn is 600
>> *#
>>
>> Result on x86 with patch (page size 4K)
>> *# ./hugepage-vmemmap
>> Returned address is 0x7fc7c2c00000 whose pfn is 1dac00
>> *#
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Reported-by : Geetika Moolchandani (geetika@linux.ibm.com)
>> Tested-by : Geetika Moolchandani (geetika@linux.ibm.com)
Acked-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
>
> I'll add
>
> Fixes: b147c89cd429 ("selftests: vm: add a hugetlb test case")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Yes. It should be a real bug fix.
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-11 2:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-10 8:33 Donet Tom
[not found] ` <20240110075351.f4b6f43e31629ddcb96503cc@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-11 2:07 ` Muchun Song [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C3CE35A3-7663-4B8E-9E85-8F0C3CD7D9EC@linux.dev \
--to=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=donettom@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=geetika@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox