* bug: merge_segments vs. lock_vma_mappings?
@ 2000-12-07 16:33 Ulrich.Weigand
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Ulrich.Weigand @ 2000-12-07 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: schwidefsky
Hello,
since test11, the merge_segments() routine assumes that every
VMA that it frees has been locked with lock_vma_mappings().
While most callers have been adapted to perform this locking,
at least two, do_mlock and sys_mprotect, do *not* currently.
This causes a deadlock in certain situations.
What's the correct way to fix this? In mlock and mprotect,
potentially many segments could be freed; do we need to
call lock_vma_mappings on all of them before calling
merge_segments?
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards
Ulrich Weigand
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
Linux for S/390 Design & Development
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH, Schoenaicher Str. 220, 71032 Boeblingen
Phone: +49-7031/16-3727 --- Email: Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2000-12-07 16:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-12-07 16:33 bug: merge_segments vs. lock_vma_mappings? Ulrich.Weigand
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox