From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hwpoison: fix race between soft_offline_page and unpoison_memory
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 15:54:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BLU437-SMTP24AA9CF28EF66D040D079B807C0@phx.gbl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150814072649.GA31021@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
On 8/14/15 3:26 PM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 01:03:53PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> On 8/14/15 12:19 PM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> ...
>>>>>>> If I read correctly, the old migratetype approach has a few problems:
>>>>>>> 1) it doesn't fix the problem completely, because
>>>>>>> set_migratetype_isolate() can fail to set MIGRATE_ISOLATE to the
>>>>>>> target page if the pageblock of the page contains one or more
>>>>>>> unmovable pages (i.e. has_unmovable_pages() returns true).
>>>>>>> 2) the original code changes migratetype to MIGRATE_ISOLATE forcibly,
>>>>>>> and sets it to MIGRATE_MOVABLE forcibly after soft offline, regardless
>>>>>>> of the original migratetype state, which could impact other subsystems
>>>>>>> like memory hotplug or compaction.
>>>>>> Maybe we can add a "FIXME" comment on the Migratetype stuff, since the
>>>>>> current linus tree calltrace and it should be fixed immediately, and I
>>>>>> don't see obvious bugs appear on migratetype stuffs at least currently,
>>>>>> so "FIXME" is enough. :-)
>>>>> Sorry if confusing, but my intention in saying about "FIXME" comment was
>>>>> that we can find another solution for this race rather than just reverting,
>>>>> so adding comment about the reported bug in current code (keeping code from
>>>>> 4491f712606) is OK for very short term.
>>>>> I understand that leaving a race window of BUG_ON is not the best thing, but
>>>>> as I said, this race shouldn't affect end-users, so this is not an urgent bug.
>>>>> # It's enough if testers know this.
>>>> The 4.2 is coming, this patch can be applied as a temporal solution in
>>>> order to fix the broken linus tree, and the any final solution can be
>>>> figured out later.
>>> I didn't reproduce this problem yet in my environment, but from code reading
>>> I guess that checking PageHWPoison flag in unmap_and_move() like below could
>>> avoid the problem. Could you testing with this, please?
>> I have already try to modify unmap_and_move() the same as what you do
>> before I post migratetype stuff. It doesn't work and have other calltrace.
> OK, then I rethink of handling the race in unpoison_memory().
>
> Currently properly contained/hwpoisoned pages should have page refcount 1
> (when the memory error hits LRU pages or hugetlb pages) or refcount 0
> (when the memory error hits the buddy page.) And current unpoison_memory()
> implicitly assumes this because otherwise the unpoisoned page has no place
> to go and it's just leaked.
> So to avoid the kernel panic, adding prechecks of refcount and mapcount
> to limit the page to unpoison for only unpoisonable pages looks OK to me.
> The page under soft offlining always has refcount >=2 and/or mapcount > 0,
> so such pages should be filtered out.
>
> Here's a patch. In my testing (run soft offline stress testing then repeat
> unpoisoning in background,) the reported (or similar) bug doesn't happen.
> Can I have your comments?
As page_action() prints out page maybe still referenced by some users,
however, PageHWPoison has already set. So you will leak many poison pages.
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
>
> Thanks,
> Naoya Horiguchi
> ---
> From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] mm/hwpoison: don't unpoison for pinned or mapped page
>
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
> ---
> mm/memory-failure.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index d1f85f6278ee..c6f14d2cd919 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1442,6 +1442,16 @@ int unpoison_memory(unsigned long pfn)
> return 0;
> }
>
> + if (page_count(page) > 1) {
> + pr_info("MCE: Someone grabs the hwpoison page %#lx\n", pfn);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (page_mapped(page)) {
> + pr_info("MCE: Someone maps the hwpoison page %#lx\n", pfn);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * unpoison_memory() can encounter thp only when the thp is being
> * worked by memory_failure() and the page lock is not held yet.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-14 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-13 7:09 Wanpeng Li
2015-08-13 8:53 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2015-08-13 9:18 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-08-13 10:04 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2015-08-13 10:27 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-08-14 4:19 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2015-08-14 5:03 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-08-14 7:26 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2015-08-14 7:54 ` Wanpeng Li [this message]
2015-08-14 7:59 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-08-14 8:38 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2015-08-14 9:01 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-08-17 4:32 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2015-08-17 4:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/hwpoison: introduce num_poisoned_pages wrappers Naoya Horiguchi
2015-08-17 4:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm/hwpoison: fix race between soft_offline_page and unpoison_memory Naoya Horiguchi
2015-08-17 4:32 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/hwpoison: don't try to unpoison containment-failed pages Naoya Horiguchi
2015-08-17 5:29 ` [PATCH] mm/hwpoison: fix race between soft_offline_page and unpoison_memory Wanpeng Li
2015-08-14 8:02 ` Naoya Horiguchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BLU437-SMTP24AA9CF28EF66D040D079B807C0@phx.gbl \
--to=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox