From: "Zhang, Qiang" <Qiang.Zhang@windriver.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: "syzbot+0123a2b8f9e623d5b443@syzkaller.appspotmail.com"
<syzbot+0123a2b8f9e623d5b443@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"alobakin@pm.me" <alobakin@pm.me>,
"songmuchun@bytedance.com" <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
"wangqing@vivo.com" <wangqing@vivo.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/page_alloc: Fix sleeping function called in case of irqsdisable
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 08:55:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BL1PR11MB5478A2FD3A25289C31B556DAFF1B9@BL1PR11MB5478.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210706083323.GQ3840@techsingularity.net>
________________________________________
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Sent: Tuesday, 6 July 2021 16:33
To: Zhang, Qiang
Cc: syzbot+0123a2b8f9e623d5b443@syzkaller.appspotmail.com; akpm@linux-foundation.org; alobakin@pm.me; songmuchun@bytedance.com; wangqing@vivo.com; linux-mm@kvack.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/page_alloc: Fix sleeping function called in case of irqsdisable
[Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 03:57:54PM +0800, qiang.zhang@windriver.com wrote:
> From: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@windriver.com>
>
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/page_alloc.c:5179
> in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: swapper/0
> .....
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
> dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:96
> ___might_sleep.cold+0x1f1/0x237 kernel/sched/core.c:9153
> prepare_alloc_pages+0x3da/0x580 mm/page_alloc.c:5179
> __alloc_pages+0x12f/0x500 mm/page_alloc.c:5375
> alloc_page_interleave+0x1e/0x200 mm/mempolicy.c:2147
> alloc_pages+0x238/0x2a0 mm/mempolicy.c:2270
> stack_depot_save+0x39d/0x4e0 lib/stackdepot.c:303
> save_stack+0x15e/0x1e0 mm/page_owner.c:120
> __set_page_owner+0x50/0x290 mm/page_owner.c:181
> prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:2445 [inline]
> __alloc_pages_bulk+0x8b9/0x1870 mm/page_alloc.c:5313
> alloc_pages_bulk_array_node include/linux/gfp.h:557 [inline]
> vm_area_alloc_pages mm/vmalloc.c:2775 [inline]
> __vmalloc_area_node mm/vmalloc.c:2845 [inline]
> __vmalloc_node_range+0x39d/0x960 mm/vmalloc.c:2947
> __vmalloc_node mm/vmalloc.c:2996 [inline]
> vzalloc+0x67/0x80 mm/vmalloc.c:3066
>
> If the PAGE_OWNER is enabled, in __set_page_owner(), the pages will be
> allocated to save calltrace info, due to the allocated action is executed
> under irq disable(pagesets.lock be held), if the gfp variable contains
> the flag that causes sleep, will trigger above information. the
> prep_new_page() is not need to disable irq for protection, fix it through
> enable irq before call prep_new_page().
>
> Fixes: 0f87d9d30f21 ("mm/page_alloc: add an array-based interface to the bulk page allocator")
> Reported-by: syzbot+0123a2b8f9e623d5b443@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Suggested-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@windriver.com>
>Same comment as v1 with respect to the impact of enabling/disabling IRQs
>for each page allocated -- it hurts performance regardless of whether
>page owner is enabled or not. If returning a single page is undesirable
>then a slightly different alternative is to only enable IRQs if page
>owner is set and then goto "Attempt the batch allocation" to reacquire
>the lock and lookup pcp.
>
Thank you for your explanation. I didn't take performance into consideration.
>--
>Mel Gorman
>SUSE Labs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-06 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-06 7:57 qiang.zhang
2021-07-06 8:33 ` Mel Gorman
2021-07-06 8:55 ` Zhang, Qiang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BL1PR11MB5478A2FD3A25289C31B556DAFF1B9@BL1PR11MB5478.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=qiang.zhang@windriver.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alobakin@pm.me \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=syzbot+0123a2b8f9e623d5b443@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=wangqing@vivo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox