From: "Abu M. Muttalib" <abum@aftek.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org, linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: RE: Relation between free() and remove_vm_struct()
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:26:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BKEKJNIHLJDCFGDBOHGMKEEMDGAA.abum@aftek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1155797966.4494.29.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Hi Arjan,
Thnax for your reply.
> second of all, glibc delays freeing of some memory (in the brk() area)
> to optimize for cases of frequent malloc/free operations, so that it
> doesn't have to go to the kernel all the time (and a free would imply a
> cross cpu TLB invalidate which is *expensive*, so batching those up is a
> really good thing for performance)
As per my observation, in two scenarios that I have tried, in one scenario I
am able to see the prints from remove_vm_struct(), but in the other
scenario, I don't see any prints from remove_vm_strcut().
My question is, if there is delayed freeing of virtual address space, it
should be the same in both the scenarios, but its not the case, and this
behavior is consistent for my two scenarios, i.e.. in one I am able to see
the kernel prints and in other I am not, respectively.
Note: I am using glib-2.0-arm.
Regards,
Abu.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-17 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-17 6:59 Abu M. Muttalib
2006-08-17 6:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-17 7:56 ` Abu M. Muttalib [this message]
2006-08-17 10:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-08-17 11:27 ` Abu M. Muttalib
2006-08-18 11:43 ` Andy Whitcroft
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BKEKJNIHLJDCFGDBOHGMKEEMDGAA.abum@aftek.com \
--to=abum@aftek.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox