* [PATCH] mm, madvise: fix potential workingset node list_lru leaks
@ 2024-12-22 12:29 Kairui Song
2024-12-23 6:58 ` Muchun Song
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kairui Song @ 2024-12-22 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Cc: Andrew Morton, Muchun Song, Matthew Wilcox, Johannes Weiner,
Roman Gushchin, Shakeel Butt, Michal Hocko, Chengming Zhou,
Qi Zheng, Yu Zhao, Sasha Levin, linux-kernel, Kairui Song,
syzbot+38a0cbd267eff2d286ff
From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Since commit 5abc1e37afa0 ("mm: list_lru: allocate list_lru_one
only when needed"), all list_lru users need to allocate the items using
the new infrastructure that provides list_lru info for slab allocation,
ensuring that the corresponding memcg list_lru is allocated before use.
For workingset shadow nodes (which are xa_node), users are converted to
use the new infrastructure by commit 9bbdc0f32409 ("xarray: use
kmem_cache_alloc_lru to allocate xa_node"). The xas->xa_lru will be
set correctly for filemap users. However, there is a missing case:
xa_node allocations caused by madvise(..., MADV_COLLAPSE).
madvise(..., MADV_COLLAPSE) will also read in the absent parts of file
map, and there will be xa_nodes allocated for the caller's memcg
(assuming it's not rootcg). However, these allocations won't trigger
memcg list_lru allocation because the proper xas info was not set.
If nothing else has allocated other xa_nodes for that memcg to trigger
list_lru creation, and memory pressure starts to evict file pages,
workingset_update_node will try to add these xa_nodes to their
corresponding memcg list_lru, and it does not exist (NULL). So they
will be added to rootcg's list_lru instead.
This shouldn't be a significant issue in practice, but it is indeed
unexpected behavior, and these xa_nodes will not be reclaimed
effectively. And may lead to incorrect counting of the
list_lru->nr_items counter.
This problem wasn't exposed until recent commit 28e98022b31ef
("mm/list_lru: simplify reparenting and initial allocation") added a
sanity check: only dying memcg could have a NULL list_lru when
list_lru_{add,del} is called. This problem triggered this WARNING.
So make madvise(..., MADV_COLLAPSE) also call xas_set_lru() to pass
the list_lru which we may want to insert xa_node into later. And move
mapping_set_update to mm/internal.h, and turn into a macro to avoid
including extra headers in mm/internal.h.
Fixes: 9bbdc0f32409 ("xarray: use kmem_cache_alloc_lru to allocate xa_node")
Reported-by: syzbot+38a0cbd267eff2d286ff@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/675d01e9.050a0220.37aaf.00be.GAE@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
---
mm/filemap.c | 9 ---------
mm/internal.h | 6 ++++++
mm/khugepaged.c | 3 +++
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index f61cf51c2238..33b60d448fca 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -124,15 +124,6 @@
* ->private_lock (zap_pte_range->block_dirty_folio)
*/
-static void mapping_set_update(struct xa_state *xas,
- struct address_space *mapping)
-{
- if (dax_mapping(mapping) || shmem_mapping(mapping))
- return;
- xas_set_update(xas, workingset_update_node);
- xas_set_lru(xas, &shadow_nodes);
-}
-
static void page_cache_delete(struct address_space *mapping,
struct folio *folio, void *shadow)
{
diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
index cb8d8e8e3ffa..4e7a3a93d0a2 100644
--- a/mm/internal.h
+++ b/mm/internal.h
@@ -1510,6 +1510,12 @@ static inline void shrinker_debugfs_remove(struct dentry *debugfs_entry,
/* Only track the nodes of mappings with shadow entries */
void workingset_update_node(struct xa_node *node);
extern struct list_lru shadow_nodes;
+#define mapping_set_update(xas, mapping) do { \
+ if (!dax_mapping(mapping) && !shmem_mapping(mapping)) { \
+ xas_set_update(xas, workingset_update_node); \
+ xas_set_lru(xas, &shadow_nodes); \
+ } \
+} while (0)
/* mremap.c */
unsigned long move_page_tables(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index 6f8d46d107b4..653dbb1ff05c 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/rcupdate_wait.h>
#include <linux/swapops.h>
#include <linux/shmem_fs.h>
+#include <linux/dax.h>
#include <linux/ksm.h>
#include <asm/tlb.h>
@@ -1837,6 +1838,8 @@ static int collapse_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
goto out;
+ mapping_set_update(&xas, mapping);
+
__folio_set_locked(new_folio);
if (is_shmem)
__folio_set_swapbacked(new_folio);
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm, madvise: fix potential workingset node list_lru leaks
2024-12-22 12:29 [PATCH] mm, madvise: fix potential workingset node list_lru leaks Kairui Song
@ 2024-12-23 6:58 ` Muchun Song
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Muchun Song @ 2024-12-23 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kairui Song
Cc: linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Johannes Weiner,
Roman Gushchin, Shakeel Butt, Michal Hocko, Chengming Zhou,
Qi Zheng, Yu Zhao, Sasha Levin, linux-kernel,
syzbot+38a0cbd267eff2d286ff, Kairui Song
> On Dec 22, 2024, at 20:29, Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
>
> Since commit 5abc1e37afa0 ("mm: list_lru: allocate list_lru_one
> only when needed"), all list_lru users need to allocate the items using
> the new infrastructure that provides list_lru info for slab allocation,
> ensuring that the corresponding memcg list_lru is allocated before use.
>
> For workingset shadow nodes (which are xa_node), users are converted to
> use the new infrastructure by commit 9bbdc0f32409 ("xarray: use
> kmem_cache_alloc_lru to allocate xa_node"). The xas->xa_lru will be
> set correctly for filemap users. However, there is a missing case:
> xa_node allocations caused by madvise(..., MADV_COLLAPSE).
>
> madvise(..., MADV_COLLAPSE) will also read in the absent parts of file
> map, and there will be xa_nodes allocated for the caller's memcg
> (assuming it's not rootcg). However, these allocations won't trigger
> memcg list_lru allocation because the proper xas info was not set.
>
> If nothing else has allocated other xa_nodes for that memcg to trigger
> list_lru creation, and memory pressure starts to evict file pages,
> workingset_update_node will try to add these xa_nodes to their
> corresponding memcg list_lru, and it does not exist (NULL). So they
> will be added to rootcg's list_lru instead.
>
> This shouldn't be a significant issue in practice, but it is indeed
> unexpected behavior, and these xa_nodes will not be reclaimed
> effectively. And may lead to incorrect counting of the
> list_lru->nr_items counter.
>
> This problem wasn't exposed until recent commit 28e98022b31ef
> ("mm/list_lru: simplify reparenting and initial allocation") added a
> sanity check: only dying memcg could have a NULL list_lru when
> list_lru_{add,del} is called. This problem triggered this WARNING.
>
> So make madvise(..., MADV_COLLAPSE) also call xas_set_lru() to pass
> the list_lru which we may want to insert xa_node into later. And move
> mapping_set_update to mm/internal.h, and turn into a macro to avoid
> including extra headers in mm/internal.h.
>
> Fixes: 9bbdc0f32409 ("xarray: use kmem_cache_alloc_lru to allocate xa_node")
Hi Kairui,
This should be 7d8faaf15545 introducing MADV_COLLAPSE, right? Because it is developed after 9bbdc0f32409.
Thanks.
> Reported-by: syzbot+38a0cbd267eff2d286ff@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/675d01e9.050a0220.37aaf.00be.GAE@google.com/
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> ---
> mm/filemap.c | 9 ---------
> mm/internal.h | 6 ++++++
> mm/khugepaged.c | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index f61cf51c2238..33b60d448fca 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -124,15 +124,6 @@
> * ->private_lock (zap_pte_range->block_dirty_folio)
> */
>
> -static void mapping_set_update(struct xa_state *xas,
> - struct address_space *mapping)
> -{
> - if (dax_mapping(mapping) || shmem_mapping(mapping))
> - return;
> - xas_set_update(xas, workingset_update_node);
> - xas_set_lru(xas, &shadow_nodes);
> -}
> -
> static void page_cache_delete(struct address_space *mapping,
> struct folio *folio, void *shadow)
> {
> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> index cb8d8e8e3ffa..4e7a3a93d0a2 100644
> --- a/mm/internal.h
> +++ b/mm/internal.h
> @@ -1510,6 +1510,12 @@ static inline void shrinker_debugfs_remove(struct dentry *debugfs_entry,
> /* Only track the nodes of mappings with shadow entries */
> void workingset_update_node(struct xa_node *node);
> extern struct list_lru shadow_nodes;
> +#define mapping_set_update(xas, mapping) do { \
> + if (!dax_mapping(mapping) && !shmem_mapping(mapping)) { \
> + xas_set_update(xas, workingset_update_node); \
> + xas_set_lru(xas, &shadow_nodes); \
> + } \
> +} while (0)
>
> /* mremap.c */
> unsigned long move_page_tables(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> index 6f8d46d107b4..653dbb1ff05c 100644
> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/rcupdate_wait.h>
> #include <linux/swapops.h>
> #include <linux/shmem_fs.h>
> +#include <linux/dax.h>
> #include <linux/ksm.h>
>
> #include <asm/tlb.h>
> @@ -1837,6 +1838,8 @@ static int collapse_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
> goto out;
>
> + mapping_set_update(&xas, mapping);
> +
> __folio_set_locked(new_folio);
> if (is_shmem)
> __folio_set_swapbacked(new_folio);
> --
> 2.47.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-12-23 6:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-12-22 12:29 [PATCH] mm, madvise: fix potential workingset node list_lru leaks Kairui Song
2024-12-23 6:58 ` Muchun Song
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox