From: "Gong, Sishuai" <sishuai@purdue.edu>
To: "cl@linux.com" <cl@linux.com>,
"penberg@kernel.org" <penberg@kernel.org>,
"rientjes@google.com" <rientjes@google.com>,
"iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com" <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"vbabka@suse.cz" <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: A racy reading spot on n->free_objects in slab.c
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 22:06:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BD83F9C4-BC29-4206-A140-B066AEAC1B40@purdue.edu> (raw)
Hi,
We found a racy reading spot on shared variable n->free_objects in slab.c and it can be data-racing with several writers that update this variable. As shown below, in function cache_alloc_refill(), n->free_objects will be read without any protection. It could be possible that the read value immediately becomes out-of-date when another writer is changing it (e.g. free_block())
Currently, we haven’t found any explicit errors due to this data race but we noticed 1) most of the reading spots on n->free_objects in slab.c have been protected by locks and 2) the racy result can affect the control flow, thus we want to point out this reader.
------------------------------------------
Execution interleaving
Thread 1 (reader) Thread 2 (writer)
cache_alloc_refill() free_block()
shared = READ_ONCE(n->shared);
if (!n->free_objects && (!shared || !shared->avail))
n->free_objects += nr_objects;
// lock protected
goto direct_grow;
spin_lock(&n->list_lock);
Thanks,
Sishuai
next reply other threads:[~2021-04-13 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-13 22:06 Gong, Sishuai [this message]
2021-04-14 7:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2021-04-14 11:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-04-14 15:09 ` Gong, Sishuai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BD83F9C4-BC29-4206-A140-B066AEAC1B40@purdue.edu \
--to=sishuai@purdue.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox