From: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Zhu Yanhai <zhu.yanhai@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 8/9] Add per-memcg zone "unreclaimable"
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:17:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinV_xj5jWFUdtCvPbk7VwkMV2gEqg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110422151420.FA72.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 11170 bytes --]
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:13 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro <
kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > index 98fc7ed..3370c5a 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -1526,6 +1526,7 @@ struct task_struct {
> > struct mem_cgroup *memcg; /* target memcg of uncharge */
> > unsigned long nr_pages; /* uncharged usage */
> > unsigned long memsw_nr_pages; /* uncharged mem+swap usage
> */
> > + struct zone *zone; /* a zone page is last uncharged */
>
> "zone" is bad name for task_struct. :-/
>
Hmm. then "zone_uncharged" ?
>
>
> > } memcg_batch;
> > #endif
> > };
> > diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> > index a062f0b..b868e597 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> > @@ -159,6 +159,8 @@ enum {
> > SWP_SCANNING = (1 << 8), /* refcount in scan_swap_map */
> > };
> >
> > +#define ZONE_RECLAIMABLE_RATE 6
> > +
>
> Need comment?
>
ok.
>
>
> > #define SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX 32
> > #define COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index 41eaa62..9e535b2 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -135,7 +135,10 @@ struct mem_cgroup_per_zone {
> > bool on_tree;
> > struct mem_cgroup *mem; /* Back pointer, we cannot
> */
> > /* use container_of
> */
> > + unsigned long pages_scanned; /* since last reclaim */
> > + bool all_unreclaimable; /* All pages pinned
> */
> > };
> > +
> > /* Macro for accessing counter */
> > #define MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, idx) ((mz)->count[(idx)])
> >
> > @@ -1162,6 +1165,103 @@ mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_from_page(struct page
> *page)
> > return &mz->reclaim_stat;
> > }
> >
> > +void mem_cgroup_mz_pages_scanned(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct zone
> *zone,
> > + unsigned long nr_scanned)
>
> this names sound like pages_scanned value getting helper function.
>
> > +{
> > + struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = NULL;
> > + int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
> > + int zid = zone_idx(zone);
> > +
> > + if (!mem)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, nid, zid);
> > + if (mz)
> > + mz->pages_scanned += nr_scanned;
> > +}
> > +
> > +bool mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct zone
> *zone)
> > +{
> > + struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = NULL;
> > + int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
> > + int zid = zone_idx(zone);
> > +
> > + if (!mem)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, nid, zid);
> > + if (mz)
> > + return mz->pages_scanned <
> > + mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable_pages(mem,
> zone) *
> > + ZONE_RECLAIMABLE_RATE;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +bool mem_cgroup_mz_unreclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct zone
> *zone)
> > +{
> > + struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = NULL;
> > + int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
> > + int zid = zone_idx(zone);
> > +
> > + if (!mem)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, nid, zid);
> > + if (mz)
> > + return mz->all_unreclaimable;
> > +
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void mem_cgroup_mz_set_unreclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct zone
> *zone)
> > +{
> > + struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = NULL;
> > + int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
> > + int zid = zone_idx(zone);
> > +
> > + if (!mem)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, nid, zid);
> > + if (mz)
> > + mz->all_unreclaimable = true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void mem_cgroup_mz_clear_unreclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> > + struct zone *zone)
> > +{
> > + struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = NULL;
> > + int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
> > + int zid = zone_idx(zone);
> > +
> > + if (!mem)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, nid, zid);
> > + if (mz) {
> > + mz->pages_scanned = 0;
> > + mz->all_unreclaimable = false;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void mem_cgroup_clear_unreclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct page
> *page)
> > +{
> > + struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = NULL;
> > +
> > + if (!mem)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, page);
> > + if (mz) {
> > + mz->pages_scanned = 0;
> > + mz->all_unreclaimable = false;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return;
> > +}
> > +
> > unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> > struct list_head *dst,
> > unsigned long *scanned, int order,
> > @@ -2709,6 +2809,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_cancel_charge_swapin(struct
> mem_cgroup *mem)
> >
> > static void mem_cgroup_do_uncharge(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> > unsigned int nr_pages,
> > + struct page *page,
> > const enum charge_type ctype)
> > {
> > struct memcg_batch_info *batch = NULL;
> > @@ -2726,6 +2827,10 @@ static void mem_cgroup_do_uncharge(struct
> mem_cgroup *mem,
> > */
> > if (!batch->memcg)
> > batch->memcg = mem;
> > +
> > + if (!batch->zone)
> > + batch->zone = page_zone(page);
> > +
> > /*
> > * do_batch > 0 when unmapping pages or inode invalidate/truncate.
> > * In those cases, all pages freed continously can be expected to
> be in
> > @@ -2747,12 +2852,17 @@ static void mem_cgroup_do_uncharge(struct
> mem_cgroup *mem,
> > */
> > if (batch->memcg != mem)
> > goto direct_uncharge;
> > +
> > + if (batch->zone != page_zone(page))
> > + mem_cgroup_mz_clear_unreclaimable(mem, page_zone(page));
> > +
> > /* remember freed charge and uncharge it later */
> > batch->nr_pages++;
> > if (uncharge_memsw)
> > batch->memsw_nr_pages++;
> > return;
> > direct_uncharge:
> > + mem_cgroup_mz_clear_unreclaimable(mem, page_zone(page));
> > res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE);
> > if (uncharge_memsw)
> > res_counter_uncharge(&mem->memsw, nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE);
> > @@ -2834,7 +2944,7 @@ __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(struct page *page,
> enum charge_type ctype)
> > mem_cgroup_get(mem);
> > }
> > if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(mem))
> > - mem_cgroup_do_uncharge(mem, nr_pages, ctype);
> > + mem_cgroup_do_uncharge(mem, nr_pages, page, ctype);
> >
> > return mem;
> >
> > @@ -2902,6 +3012,10 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge_end(void)
> > if (batch->memsw_nr_pages)
> > res_counter_uncharge(&batch->memcg->memsw,
> > batch->memsw_nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE);
> > + if (batch->zone)
> > + mem_cgroup_mz_clear_unreclaimable(batch->memcg,
> batch->zone);
> > + batch->zone = NULL;
> > +
> > memcg_oom_recover(batch->memcg);
> > /* forget this pointer (for sanity check) */
> > batch->memcg = NULL;
> > @@ -4667,6 +4781,8 @@ static int alloc_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(struct
> mem_cgroup *mem, int node)
> > mz->usage_in_excess = 0;
> > mz->on_tree = false;
> > mz->mem = mem;
> > + mz->pages_scanned = 0;
> > + mz->all_unreclaimable = false;
> > }
> > return 0;
> > }
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index ba03a10..87653d6 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -1414,6 +1414,9 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> struct zone *zone,
> > ISOLATE_BOTH : ISOLATE_INACTIVE,
> > zone, sc->mem_cgroup,
> > 0, file);
> > +
> > + mem_cgroup_mz_pages_scanned(sc->mem_cgroup, zone,
> nr_scanned);
> > +
> > /*
> > * mem_cgroup_isolate_pages() keeps track of
> > * scanned pages on its own.
> > @@ -1533,6 +1536,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long
> nr_pages, struct zone *zone,
> > * mem_cgroup_isolate_pages() keeps track of
> > * scanned pages on its own.
> > */
> > + mem_cgroup_mz_pages_scanned(sc->mem_cgroup, zone,
> pgscanned);
> > }
> >
> > reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[file] += nr_taken;
> > @@ -1989,7 +1993,8 @@ static void shrink_zones(int priority, struct
> zonelist *zonelist,
> >
> > static bool zone_reclaimable(struct zone *zone)
> > {
> > - return zone->pages_scanned < zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) * 6;
> > + return zone->pages_scanned < zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) *
> > + ZONE_RECLAIMABLE_RATE;
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -2651,10 +2656,20 @@ static void shrink_memcg_node(pg_data_t *pgdat,
> int order,
> > if (!scan)
> > continue;
> >
> > + if (mem_cgroup_mz_unreclaimable(mem_cont, zone) &&
> > + priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > sc->nr_scanned = 0;
> > shrink_zone(priority, zone, sc);
> > total_scanned += sc->nr_scanned;
> >
> > + if (mem_cgroup_mz_unreclaimable(mem_cont, zone))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (!mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable(mem_cont, zone))
> > + mem_cgroup_mz_set_unreclaimable(mem_cont, zone);
> > +
> > /*
> > * If we've done a decent amount of scanning and
> > * the reclaim ratio is low, start doing writepage
> > @@ -2716,10 +2731,16 @@ static unsigned long shrink_mem_cgroup(struct
> mem_cgroup *mem_cont, int order)
> > shrink_memcg_node(pgdat, order, &sc);
> > total_scanned += sc.nr_scanned;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Set the node which has at least one reclaimable
> > + * zone
> > + */
> > for (i = pgdat->nr_zones - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> > struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
> >
> > - if (populated_zone(zone))
> > + if (populated_zone(zone) &&
> > + !mem_cgroup_mz_unreclaimable(mem_cont,
> > + zone))
> > break;
>
> global reclaim call shrink_zone() when priority==DEF_PRIORITY even if
> all_unreclaimable is set. Is this intentional change?
> If so, please add some comments.
>
> Ok.
--Ying
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 13863 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-22 6:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-22 4:24 [RFC PATCH V7 0/9] memcg: per cgroup background reclaim Ying Han
2011-04-22 4:24 ` [PATCH V7 1/9] Add kswapd descriptor Ying Han
2011-04-22 4:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22 4:47 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-22 5:55 ` Ying Han
2011-04-22 4:24 ` [PATCH V7 2/9] Add per memcg reclaim watermarks Ying Han
2011-04-22 4:24 ` [PATCH V7 3/9] New APIs to adjust per-memcg wmarks Ying Han
2011-04-22 4:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22 4:24 ` [PATCH V7 4/9] Add memcg kswapd thread pool Ying Han
2011-04-22 4:36 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22 4:49 ` Ying Han
2011-04-22 5:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22 5:53 ` Ying Han
2011-04-22 5:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22 6:10 ` Ying Han
2011-04-22 7:46 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22 7:59 ` Ying Han
2011-04-22 8:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-24 23:26 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-25 2:08 ` Ying Han
2011-04-22 6:02 ` Zhu Yanhai
2011-04-22 6:14 ` Ying Han
2011-04-22 5:39 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-22 5:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22 4:24 ` [PATCH V7 5/9] Infrastructure to support per-memcg reclaim Ying Han
2011-04-22 4:38 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22 5:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-22 5:59 ` Ying Han
2011-04-22 5:27 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-22 6:00 ` Ying Han
2011-04-22 4:24 ` [PATCH V7 6/9] Implement the select_victim_node within memcg Ying Han
2011-04-22 4:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22 4:24 ` [PATCH V7 7/9] Per-memcg background reclaim Ying Han
2011-04-22 4:40 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22 6:00 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-22 7:54 ` Ying Han
2011-04-22 8:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-22 18:37 ` Ying Han
2011-04-25 2:21 ` [PATCH] vmscan,memcg: memcg aware swap token KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-25 9:47 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-25 17:13 ` Ying Han
2011-04-26 2:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-22 4:24 ` [PATCH V7 8/9] Add per-memcg zone "unreclaimable" Ying Han
2011-04-22 4:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22 6:13 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-22 6:17 ` Ying Han [this message]
2011-04-22 4:24 ` [PATCH V7 9/9] Enable per-memcg background reclaim Ying Han
2011-04-22 4:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTinV_xj5jWFUdtCvPbk7VwkMV2gEqg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yinghan@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=zhu.yanhai@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox