linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Zhu Yanhai <zhu.yanhai@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 8/9] Add per-memcg zone "unreclaimable"
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:17:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinV_xj5jWFUdtCvPbk7VwkMV2gEqg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110422151420.FA72.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 11170 bytes --]

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:13 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro <
kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > index 98fc7ed..3370c5a 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -1526,6 +1526,7 @@ struct task_struct {
> >               struct mem_cgroup *memcg; /* target memcg of uncharge */
> >               unsigned long nr_pages; /* uncharged usage */
> >               unsigned long memsw_nr_pages; /* uncharged mem+swap usage
> */
> > +             struct zone *zone; /* a zone page is last uncharged */
>
> "zone" is bad name for task_struct. :-/
>

Hmm. then "zone_uncharged" ?

>
>
> >       } memcg_batch;
> >  #endif
> >  };
> > diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> > index a062f0b..b868e597 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> > @@ -159,6 +159,8 @@ enum {
> >       SWP_SCANNING    = (1 << 8),     /* refcount in scan_swap_map */
> >  };
> >
> > +#define ZONE_RECLAIMABLE_RATE 6
> > +
>
> Need comment?
>

ok.

>
>
> >  #define SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX 32
> >  #define COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index 41eaa62..9e535b2 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -135,7 +135,10 @@ struct mem_cgroup_per_zone {
> >       bool                    on_tree;
> >       struct mem_cgroup       *mem;           /* Back pointer, we cannot
> */
> >                                               /* use container_of
>  */
> > +     unsigned long           pages_scanned;  /* since last reclaim */
> > +     bool                    all_unreclaimable;      /* All pages pinned
> */
> >  };
> > +
> >  /* Macro for accessing counter */
> >  #define MEM_CGROUP_ZSTAT(mz, idx)    ((mz)->count[(idx)])
> >
> > @@ -1162,6 +1165,103 @@ mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_from_page(struct page
> *page)
> >       return &mz->reclaim_stat;
> >  }
> >
> > +void mem_cgroup_mz_pages_scanned(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct zone
> *zone,
> > +                                             unsigned long nr_scanned)
>
> this names sound like pages_scanned value getting helper function.
>



> > +{
> > +     struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = NULL;
> > +     int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
> > +     int zid = zone_idx(zone);
> > +
> > +     if (!mem)
> > +             return;
> > +
> > +     mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, nid, zid);
> > +     if (mz)
> > +             mz->pages_scanned += nr_scanned;
> > +}
> > +
> > +bool mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct zone
> *zone)
> > +{
> > +     struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = NULL;
> > +     int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
> > +     int zid = zone_idx(zone);
> > +
> > +     if (!mem)
> > +             return 0;
> > +
> > +     mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, nid, zid);
> > +     if (mz)
> > +             return mz->pages_scanned <
> > +                             mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable_pages(mem,
> zone) *
> > +                             ZONE_RECLAIMABLE_RATE;
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +bool mem_cgroup_mz_unreclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct zone
> *zone)
> > +{
> > +     struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = NULL;
> > +     int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
> > +     int zid = zone_idx(zone);
> > +
> > +     if (!mem)
> > +             return false;
> > +
> > +     mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, nid, zid);
> > +     if (mz)
> > +             return mz->all_unreclaimable;
> > +
> > +     return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void mem_cgroup_mz_set_unreclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct zone
> *zone)
> > +{
> > +     struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = NULL;
> > +     int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
> > +     int zid = zone_idx(zone);
> > +
> > +     if (!mem)
> > +             return;
> > +
> > +     mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, nid, zid);
> > +     if (mz)
> > +             mz->all_unreclaimable = true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void mem_cgroup_mz_clear_unreclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> > +                                    struct zone *zone)
> > +{
> > +     struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = NULL;
> > +     int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
> > +     int zid = zone_idx(zone);
> > +
> > +     if (!mem)
> > +             return;
> > +
> > +     mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, nid, zid);
> > +     if (mz) {
> > +             mz->pages_scanned = 0;
> > +             mz->all_unreclaimable = false;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void mem_cgroup_clear_unreclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct page
> *page)
> > +{
> > +     struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz = NULL;
> > +
> > +     if (!mem)
> > +             return;
> > +
> > +     mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(mem, page);
> > +     if (mz) {
> > +             mz->pages_scanned = 0;
> > +             mz->all_unreclaimable = false;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return;
> > +}
> > +
> >  unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> >                                       struct list_head *dst,
> >                                       unsigned long *scanned, int order,
> > @@ -2709,6 +2809,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_cancel_charge_swapin(struct
> mem_cgroup *mem)
> >
> >  static void mem_cgroup_do_uncharge(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> >                                  unsigned int nr_pages,
> > +                                struct page *page,
> >                                  const enum charge_type ctype)
> >  {
> >       struct memcg_batch_info *batch = NULL;
> > @@ -2726,6 +2827,10 @@ static void mem_cgroup_do_uncharge(struct
> mem_cgroup *mem,
> >        */
> >       if (!batch->memcg)
> >               batch->memcg = mem;
> > +
> > +     if (!batch->zone)
> > +             batch->zone = page_zone(page);
> > +
> >       /*
> >        * do_batch > 0 when unmapping pages or inode invalidate/truncate.
> >        * In those cases, all pages freed continously can be expected to
> be in
> > @@ -2747,12 +2852,17 @@ static void mem_cgroup_do_uncharge(struct
> mem_cgroup *mem,
> >        */
> >       if (batch->memcg != mem)
> >               goto direct_uncharge;
> > +
> > +     if (batch->zone != page_zone(page))
> > +             mem_cgroup_mz_clear_unreclaimable(mem, page_zone(page));
> > +
> >       /* remember freed charge and uncharge it later */
> >       batch->nr_pages++;
> >       if (uncharge_memsw)
> >               batch->memsw_nr_pages++;
> >       return;
> >  direct_uncharge:
> > +     mem_cgroup_mz_clear_unreclaimable(mem, page_zone(page));
> >       res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE);
> >       if (uncharge_memsw)
> >               res_counter_uncharge(&mem->memsw, nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE);
> > @@ -2834,7 +2944,7 @@ __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(struct page *page,
> enum charge_type ctype)
> >               mem_cgroup_get(mem);
> >       }
> >       if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(mem))
> > -             mem_cgroup_do_uncharge(mem, nr_pages, ctype);
> > +             mem_cgroup_do_uncharge(mem, nr_pages, page, ctype);
> >
> >       return mem;
> >
> > @@ -2902,6 +3012,10 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge_end(void)
> >       if (batch->memsw_nr_pages)
> >               res_counter_uncharge(&batch->memcg->memsw,
> >                                    batch->memsw_nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE);
> > +     if (batch->zone)
> > +             mem_cgroup_mz_clear_unreclaimable(batch->memcg,
> batch->zone);
> > +     batch->zone = NULL;
> > +
> >       memcg_oom_recover(batch->memcg);
> >       /* forget this pointer (for sanity check) */
> >       batch->memcg = NULL;
> > @@ -4667,6 +4781,8 @@ static int alloc_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(struct
> mem_cgroup *mem, int node)
> >               mz->usage_in_excess = 0;
> >               mz->on_tree = false;
> >               mz->mem = mem;
> > +             mz->pages_scanned = 0;
> > +             mz->all_unreclaimable = false;
> >       }
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index ba03a10..87653d6 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -1414,6 +1414,9 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> struct zone *zone,
> >                                       ISOLATE_BOTH : ISOLATE_INACTIVE,
> >                       zone, sc->mem_cgroup,
> >                       0, file);
> > +
> > +             mem_cgroup_mz_pages_scanned(sc->mem_cgroup, zone,
> nr_scanned);
> > +
> >               /*
> >                * mem_cgroup_isolate_pages() keeps track of
> >                * scanned pages on its own.
> > @@ -1533,6 +1536,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long
> nr_pages, struct zone *zone,
> >                * mem_cgroup_isolate_pages() keeps track of
> >                * scanned pages on its own.
> >                */
> > +             mem_cgroup_mz_pages_scanned(sc->mem_cgroup, zone,
> pgscanned);
> >       }
> >
> >       reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[file] += nr_taken;
> > @@ -1989,7 +1993,8 @@ static void shrink_zones(int priority, struct
> zonelist *zonelist,
> >
> >  static bool zone_reclaimable(struct zone *zone)
> >  {
> > -     return zone->pages_scanned < zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) * 6;
> > +     return zone->pages_scanned < zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) *
> > +                                     ZONE_RECLAIMABLE_RATE;
> >  }
> >
> >  /*
> > @@ -2651,10 +2656,20 @@ static void shrink_memcg_node(pg_data_t *pgdat,
> int order,
> >               if (!scan)
> >                       continue;
> >
> > +             if (mem_cgroup_mz_unreclaimable(mem_cont, zone) &&
> > +                     priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
> > +                     continue;
> > +
> >               sc->nr_scanned = 0;
> >               shrink_zone(priority, zone, sc);
> >               total_scanned += sc->nr_scanned;
> >
> > +             if (mem_cgroup_mz_unreclaimable(mem_cont, zone))
> > +                     continue;
> > +
> > +             if (!mem_cgroup_zone_reclaimable(mem_cont, zone))
> > +                     mem_cgroup_mz_set_unreclaimable(mem_cont, zone);
> > +
> >               /*
> >                * If we've done a decent amount of scanning and
> >                * the reclaim ratio is low, start doing writepage
> > @@ -2716,10 +2731,16 @@ static unsigned long shrink_mem_cgroup(struct
> mem_cgroup *mem_cont, int order)
> >                       shrink_memcg_node(pgdat, order, &sc);
> >                       total_scanned += sc.nr_scanned;
> >
> > +                     /*
> > +                      * Set the node which has at least one reclaimable
> > +                      * zone
> > +                      */
> >                       for (i = pgdat->nr_zones - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> >                               struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
> >
> > -                             if (populated_zone(zone))
> > +                             if (populated_zone(zone) &&
> > +                                 !mem_cgroup_mz_unreclaimable(mem_cont,
> > +                                                             zone))
> >                                       break;
>
> global reclaim call shrink_zone() when priority==DEF_PRIORITY even if
> all_unreclaimable is set. Is this intentional change?
> If so, please add some comments.
>
> Ok.

--Ying

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 13863 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-22  6:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-22  4:24 [RFC PATCH V7 0/9] memcg: per cgroup background reclaim Ying Han
2011-04-22  4:24 ` [PATCH V7 1/9] Add kswapd descriptor Ying Han
2011-04-22  4:31   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22  4:47   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-22  5:55     ` Ying Han
2011-04-22  4:24 ` [PATCH V7 2/9] Add per memcg reclaim watermarks Ying Han
2011-04-22  4:24 ` [PATCH V7 3/9] New APIs to adjust per-memcg wmarks Ying Han
2011-04-22  4:32   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22  4:24 ` [PATCH V7 4/9] Add memcg kswapd thread pool Ying Han
2011-04-22  4:36   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22  4:49     ` Ying Han
2011-04-22  5:00       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22  5:53         ` Ying Han
2011-04-22  5:59           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22  6:10             ` Ying Han
2011-04-22  7:46               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22  7:59                 ` Ying Han
2011-04-22  8:02                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-24 23:26                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-25  2:08                     ` Ying Han
2011-04-22  6:02         ` Zhu Yanhai
2011-04-22  6:14           ` Ying Han
2011-04-22  5:39   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-22  5:56     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22  4:24 ` [PATCH V7 5/9] Infrastructure to support per-memcg reclaim Ying Han
2011-04-22  4:38   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22  5:11   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-22  5:59     ` Ying Han
2011-04-22  5:27   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-22  6:00     ` Ying Han
2011-04-22  4:24 ` [PATCH V7 6/9] Implement the select_victim_node within memcg Ying Han
2011-04-22  4:39   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22  4:24 ` [PATCH V7 7/9] Per-memcg background reclaim Ying Han
2011-04-22  4:40   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22  6:00   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-22  7:54     ` Ying Han
2011-04-22  8:44       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-22 18:37         ` Ying Han
2011-04-25  2:21           ` [PATCH] vmscan,memcg: memcg aware swap token KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-25  9:47             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-25 17:13             ` Ying Han
2011-04-26  2:08               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-22  4:24 ` [PATCH V7 8/9] Add per-memcg zone "unreclaimable" Ying Han
2011-04-22  4:43   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-04-22  6:13   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-22  6:17     ` Ying Han [this message]
2011-04-22  4:24 ` [PATCH V7 9/9] Enable per-memcg background reclaim Ying Han
2011-04-22  4:44   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BANLkTinV_xj5jWFUdtCvPbk7VwkMV2gEqg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yinghan@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    --cc=zhu.yanhai@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox