On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 05/12/2011 10:53 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>
>> If the memcg reclaim code detects the target memcg below its limit it
>> exits and returns a guaranteed non-zero value so that the charge is
>> retried.
>>
>> Nowadays, the charge side checks the memcg limit itself and does not
>> rely on this non-zero return value trick.
>>
>> This patch removes it.  The reclaim code will now always return the
>> true number of pages it reclaimed on its own.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner<hannes@cmpxchg.org>
>>
>
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel<riel@redhat.com>
>

Acked-by: Ying Han<yinghan@google.com>