From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail6.bemta12.messagelabs.com (mail6.bemta12.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.247]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C65CF6B004A for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:11:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: by vxk20 with SMTP id 20so2674139vxk.14 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 01:11:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110610004331.13672278.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1306922672-9012-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> <20110601181918.GO3660@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4DF1C9DE.4070605@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110610004331.13672278.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:11:42 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make GFP_DMA allocations w/o ZONE_DMA emit a warning instead of failing From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , tglx@linutronix.de, rientjes@google.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mel@csn.ul.ie, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, riel@redhat.com, pavel@ucw.cz On 6/10/11, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:38:06 +0900 KOSAKI Motohiro > wrote: > >> Subject: [PATCH] Revert "mm: fail GFP_DMA allocations when ZONE_DMA is not >> configured" > > Confused. We reverted this over a week ago. Should one submit a patch adding a warning to GFP_DMA allocations w/o ZONE_DMA, or the idea of the original patch is wrong? -- With best wishes Dmitry -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org