From: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
To: Lutz Vieweg <lvml@5t9.de>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: "make -j" with memory.(memsw.)limit_in_bytes smaller than required -> livelock, even for unlimited processes
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:28:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTik50FB_CdSqr15zoyb_Pbxc2PgeBw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E00C483.5080302@5t9.de>
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Lutz Vieweg <lvml@5t9.de> wrote:
> On 06/21/2011 06:01 PM, Ying Han wrote:
>>
>> The following patch might not be the root-cause of livelock, but
>> should reduce the [kworker/*] in your case.
>>
>> From d1372da4d3c6f8051b5b1cf7b5e8b45a8094b388 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>
>> Can you give a try?
>
> I will first need to move this test to a machine (like my Laptop)
> that I can more aggressively reboot without disturbing the
> developers on the shared hardware. Will do that asap.
>
>> I don't know which kernel you are using in case
>> you don't have this patched yet.
>
> 2.6.39.
> 5 out of 6 hunks in your patch apply to this version, 1 is rejected -
> so I guess I should upgrade to a more recent kernel, first.
> Would 2.6.39.1 be sufficient or would some non-release kernel
> (from which git repository?) be required?
Last time I tried was build on mmotm-2011-05-12-15-52 with the patch.
But I assume you can also
patch it on top of 2.6.39.
Meantime, I am trying to reproduce your livelock on my host with kernbench.
--Ying
>
> Regards,
>
> Lutz Vieweg
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-21 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-21 14:51 Lutz Vieweg
2011-06-21 16:01 ` Ying Han
2011-06-21 16:19 ` Lutz Vieweg
2011-06-21 16:28 ` Ying Han [this message]
2011-06-21 16:35 ` Lutz Vieweg
2011-06-22 0:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-22 1:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-22 10:20 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-22 14:37 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-22 9:53 ` Lutz Vieweg
2011-06-23 6:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTik50FB_CdSqr15zoyb_Pbxc2PgeBw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yinghan@google.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lvml@5t9.de \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox