From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980CB6B0011 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 23:55:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so727879wyf.14 for ; Tue, 03 May 2011 20:55:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110503082550.GD18927@tiehlicka.suse.cz> References: <20110425182849.ab708f12.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110429133313.GB306@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <20110501150410.75D2.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110503064945.GA18927@tiehlicka.suse.cz> <20110503082550.GD18927@tiehlicka.suse.cz> From: KOSAKI Motohiro Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 12:55:19 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] memcg: add high/low watermark to res_counter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Ying Han , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , Johannes Weiner , "minchan.kim@gmail.com" >> Ah, right. So, do you have an alternative idea? > > Why cannot we just keep the global reclaim semantic and make it free > memory (hard_limit - usage_in_bytes) based with low limit as the trigger > for reclaiming? Because it's not free memory. the cgroup doesn't reach a limit. but.... -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org