From: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
"bsingharora@gmail.com" <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
"hannes@cmpxchg.org" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] Fix not good check of mem_cgroup_local_usage()
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:27:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=4o-xY46OtsvNCxVKUT-qJBXRMMFZCe-m7eMV-_mesXw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110616125443.23584d78.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:54 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> From fcfc6ee9847b0b2571cd6e9847572d7c70e1e2b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:23:54 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH 5/7] Fix not good check of mem_cgroup_local_usage()
>
> Now, mem_cgroup_local_usage(memcg) is used as hint for scanning memory
> cgroup hierarchy. If it returns true, the memcg has some reclaimable memory.
>
> But this function doesn't take care of
> - unevictable pages
> - anon pages on swapless system.
>
> This patch fixes the function to use LRU information.
> For NUMA, for avoid scanning, numa scan bitmap is used. If it's
> empty, some more precise check will be done.
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> Index: mmotm-0615/mm/memcontrol.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-0615.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ mmotm-0615/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -632,15 +632,6 @@ static long mem_cgroup_read_stat(struct
> return val;
> }
>
> -static long mem_cgroup_local_usage(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
> -{
> - long ret;
> -
> - ret = mem_cgroup_read_stat(mem, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_RSS);
> - ret += mem_cgroup_read_stat(mem, MEM_CGROUP_STAT_CACHE);
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> static void mem_cgroup_swap_statistics(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> bool charge)
> {
> @@ -1713,6 +1704,23 @@ static void mem_cgroup_numascan_init(str
> mutex_init(&mem->numascan_mutex);
> }
>
> +static bool mem_cgroup_reclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem, bool noswap)
> +{
> + if (!nodes_empty(mem->scan_nodes))
> + return true;
> + /* slow path */
> + if (mem_cgroup_get_local_zonestat(mem, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE))
> + return true;
> + if (mem_cgroup_get_local_zonestat(mem, LRU_ACTIVE_FILE))
> + return true;
Wondering if we can simplify this like:
if (mem_cgroup_nr_file_lru_pages(mem))
return true;
> + if (noswap || !total_swap_pages)
> + return false;
> + if (mem_cgroup_get_local_zonestat(mem, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON))
> + return true;
> + if (mem_cgroup_get_local_zonestat(mem, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON))
> + return true;
the same:
if (mem_cgroup_nr_anon_lru_pages(mem))
return true;
> + return false;
> +}
The two functions above are part of memory.numa_stat patch which is in
mmotm i believe. Just feel the functionality a bit duplicate except
the noswap parameter and scan_nodes.
--Ying
> #else
> int mem_cgroup_select_victim_node(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
> {
> @@ -1722,6 +1730,21 @@ static void mem_cgroup_numascan_init(str
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +static bool mem_cgroup_reclaimable(struct mem_cgroup *mem, bool noswap)
> +{
> + if (mem_cgroup_get_zonestat_node(mem, 0, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE))
> + return true;
> + if (mem_cgroup_get_zonestat_node(mem, 0, LRU_ACTIVE_FILE))
> + return true;
> + if (noswap || !total_swap_pages)
> + return false;
> + if (mem_cgroup_get_zonestat_node(mem, 0, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON))
> + return true;
> + if (mem_cgroup_get_zonestat_node(mem, 0, LRU_ACTIVE_ANON))
> + return true;
> + return false;
> +}
> #endif
>
>
> @@ -1811,7 +1834,7 @@ again:
>
> while (visit--) {
> victim = mem_cgroup_select_victim(root_mem);
> - if (!mem_cgroup_local_usage(victim)) {
> + if (!mem_cgroup_reclaimable(victim, noswap)) {
> /* this cgroup's local usage == 0 */
> css_put(&victim->css);
> continue;
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-17 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-16 3:47 [PATCH 0/7] memcg numa node scan update KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-16 3:51 ` [PATCH 1/7] Fix mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim() to do stable hierarchy walk KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-22 15:15 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-22 18:33 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-23 6:21 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-16 3:52 ` [PATCH 2/7] export memory cgroup's swappines by mem_cgroup_swappiness() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-22 15:22 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-22 16:31 ` Ying Han
2011-06-16 3:53 ` [PATCH 3/7] memcg: add memory.scan_stat KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-17 22:04 ` Ying Han
2011-06-19 23:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-20 4:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-20 6:59 ` Ying Han
2011-06-21 6:49 ` Ying Han
2011-06-21 6:52 ` Ying Han
2011-06-22 0:20 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-24 21:40 ` Ying Han
2011-06-27 1:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-16 3:54 ` [PATCH 4/7] memcg: update numa information based on event counter KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-22 15:53 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-23 6:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-23 8:12 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-16 3:54 ` [PATCH 5/7] Fix not good check of mem_cgroup_local_usage() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-17 22:27 ` Ying Han [this message]
2011-06-19 23:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-22 15:58 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-16 3:56 ` [PATCH 6/7] memcg: calc NUMA node's weight for scan KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-23 13:35 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-23 14:27 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2011-06-16 3:57 ` [PATCH 7/7] memcg: proportional fair vicitm node selection KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-23 13:48 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-23 14:10 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2011-06-23 14:30 ` Michal Hocko
2011-06-23 22:20 ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTi=4o-xY46OtsvNCxVKUT-qJBXRMMFZCe-m7eMV-_mesXw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=yinghan@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox