From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: RE: [RFC 2/3] LVHPT - Setup LVHPT Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 09:58:04 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Luck, Tony" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Ian Wienand , "Chen, Kenneth W" Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: > Being relatively inexperienced, all this dynamic patching (SMP, page > table, this) scares me in that what is executing diverges from what > appears to be in source code, making difficult things even more > difficult to debug. Is there consensus that a long term goal should > be that short and long formats should be dynamically selectable? I wouldn't rule anything out until I see what can be done, and how maintainable the code to do it is. Perhaps someone will come up with the ultimate in dynamic selection and use long format for some processes, and short format for others (and thus get around the objections that some workloads perform less well with long format). -Tony -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org