From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org, sj@kernel.org,
maskray@google.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, david@redhat.com,
21cnbao@gmail.com, mhocko@suse.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com,
zokeefe@google.com, shy828301@gmail.com, xiehuan09@gmail.com,
libang.li@antgroup.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
songmuchun@bytedance.com, peterx@redhat.com, minchan@kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into pagewalk loop
Date: Wed, 08 May 2024 10:07:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B1DA2DA4-AFEA-4541-8DFC-0D815249A064@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK1f24mRVam3w9CZkq4O0smGUTVUQfdvA48mqsU+NKxMUxdz1A@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9141 bytes --]
On 8 May 2024, at 1:43, Lance Yang wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 11:26 PM Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 1 May 2024, at 0:26, Lance Yang wrote:
>>
>>> In preparation for supporting try_to_unmap_one() to unmap PMD-mapped
>>> folios, start the pagewalk first, then call split_huge_pmd_address()
>>> to split the folio.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/huge_mm.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>> mm/huge_memory.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>>> mm/rmap.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++------
>>> 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>> index c8d3ec116e29..38c4b5537715 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>> @@ -409,6 +409,20 @@ static inline bool thp_migration_supported(void)
>>> return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>>> + pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio);
>>> +
>>> +static inline void align_huge_pmd_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> + unsigned long *start,
>>> + unsigned long *end)
>>> +{
>>> + *start = ALIGN(*start, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
>>> + *end = ALIGN_DOWN(*end, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
>>> +
>>> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(vma->vm_start > *start);
>>> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(vma->vm_end < *end);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> #else /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
>>>
>>> static inline bool folio_test_pmd_mappable(struct folio *folio)
>>> @@ -471,6 +485,12 @@ static inline void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>>> unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
>>> static inline void split_huge_pmd_address(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
>>> +static inline void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> + unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd,
>>> + bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
>>> +static inline void align_huge_pmd_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> + unsigned long *start,
>>> + unsigned long *end) {}
>>>
>>> #define split_huge_pud(__vma, __pmd, __address) \
>>> do { } while (0)
>>> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
>>> index 8261b5669397..145505a1dd05 100644
>>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>>> @@ -2584,6 +2584,27 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>>> pmd_populate(mm, pmd, pgtable);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>>> + pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio)
>>> +{
>>> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio));
>>> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(address, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE));
>>> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio));
>>> + VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio);
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * When the caller requests to set up a migration entry, we
>>> + * require a folio to check the PMD against. Otherwise, there
>>> + * is a risk of replacing the wrong folio.
>>> + */
>>> + if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
>>> + is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) {
>>> + if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))
>>> + return;
>>> + __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, address, freeze);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>>> unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio)
>>> {
>>> @@ -2595,26 +2616,7 @@ void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>>> (address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK) + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
>>> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
>>> ptl = pmd_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd);
>>> -
>>> - /*
>>> - * If caller asks to setup a migration entry, we need a folio to check
>>> - * pmd against. Otherwise we can end up replacing wrong folio.
>>> - */
>>> - VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio);
>>> - VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio));
>>> -
>>> - if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
>>> - is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) {
>>> - /*
>>> - * It's safe to call pmd_page when folio is set because it's
>>> - * guaranteed that pmd is present.
>>> - */
>>> - if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))
>>> - goto out;
>>> - __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, range.start, freeze);
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> -out:
>>> + split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, range.start, pmd, freeze, folio);
>>> spin_unlock(ptl);
>>> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
>>> index 7e2575d669a9..432601154583 100644
>>> --- a/mm/rmap.c
>>> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
>>> @@ -1636,9 +1636,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> if (flags & TTU_SYNC)
>>> pvmw.flags = PVMW_SYNC;
>>>
>>> - if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)
>>> - split_huge_pmd_address(vma, address, false, folio);
>>> -
>>> /*
>>> * For THP, we have to assume the worse case ie pmd for invalidation.
>>> * For hugetlb, it could be much worse if we need to do pud
>>> @@ -1650,6 +1647,8 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> range.end = vma_address_end(&pvmw);
>>> mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0, vma->vm_mm,
>>> address, range.end);
>>> + if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)
>>> + align_huge_pmd_range(vma, &range.start, &range.end);
>>> if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) {
>>> /*
>>> * If sharing is possible, start and end will be adjusted
>>> @@ -1664,9 +1663,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
>>>
>>> while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
>>> - /* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
>>> - VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!pvmw.pte, folio);
>>> -
>>> /*
>>> * If the folio is in an mlock()d vma, we must not swap it out.
>>> */
>>> @@ -1678,6 +1674,22 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> goto walk_done_err;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + if (!pvmw.pte && (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)) {
>>> + /*
>>> + * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and start once
>>> + * again from that now-PTE-mapped page table.
>>> + */
>>> + split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, range.start, pvmw.pmd, false,
>>> + folio);
>>
>> Just in case you might miss here, since you will no longer align
>> range.start as Baolin mentioned in another email and you have a VM_WARN_ONCE
>> in split_huge_pmd_locked(), you will need to align the input address now.
>
> Thanks for bringing that up!
>
> I do miss the alignment here when I decide to no longer align range.start
> in another email - thanks!
>
No problem.
> Zi, could I move the alignment here?
> IIUC, we will not encounter a partially mapped THP here, and range.start
> and range.end should also not beyond the VMA limits.
>
> align_huge_pmd_range(vma, &range.start, &range.end);
> split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, range.start, pvmw.pmd, false,
> folio);
I think you can just do
split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, ALIGN(range.start, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE), pvmw.pmd, false, folio);
since range will later be used by mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end() and changing
it might cause secondary TLB invalidation issues.
>
> Thanks,
> Lance
>
>>
>>> + pvmw.pmd = NULL;
>>> + spin_unlock(pvmw.ptl);
>>> + flags &= ~TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
>>> + continue;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
>>> + VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!pvmw.pte, folio);
>>> +
>>> pfn = pte_pfn(ptep_get(pvmw.pte));
>>> subpage = folio_page(folio, pfn - folio_pfn(folio));
>>> address = pvmw.address;
>>> --
>>> 2.33.1
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Yan, Zi
--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 854 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-08 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-01 4:26 [PATCH v4 0/3] Reclaim lazyfree THP without splitting Lance Yang
2024-05-01 4:26 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mm/rmap: remove duplicated exit code in pagewalk loop Lance Yang
2024-05-07 14:51 ` Zi Yan
2024-05-07 14:53 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-01 4:26 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into " Lance Yang
2024-05-07 3:40 ` Baolin Wang
2024-05-07 4:37 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-07 8:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07 8:38 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-07 17:22 ` Andrew Morton
2024-05-07 17:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07 17:38 ` Andrew Morton
2024-05-07 18:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-05-07 15:26 ` Zi Yan
2024-05-08 5:43 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-08 14:07 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2024-05-08 14:35 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-08 14:48 ` Zi Yan
2024-05-08 14:56 ` Zi Yan
2024-05-08 15:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-08 16:22 ` Zi Yan
2024-05-08 16:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-09 8:21 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-09 14:53 ` Zi Yan
2024-05-09 8:56 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-01 4:27 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mm/vmscan: avoid split lazyfree THP during shrink_folio_list() Lance Yang
2024-05-07 4:00 ` Baolin Wang
2024-05-07 6:32 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-07 8:26 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-07 9:33 ` Baolin Wang
2024-05-07 11:37 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-09 9:36 ` Baolin Wang
2024-05-09 12:17 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-07 16:20 ` Zi Yan
2024-05-08 5:14 ` Lance Yang
2024-05-01 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Reclaim lazyfree THP without splitting SeongJae Park
2024-05-02 0:30 ` Lance Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B1DA2DA4-AFEA-4541-8DFC-0D815249A064@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=libang.li@antgroup.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maskray@google.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiehuan09@gmail.com \
--cc=zokeefe@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox